Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Anaes TopicsApplied cardiovascular & respiratory physiology

Anaes · Applied cardiovascular & respiratory physiology

Neuromuscular junction physiology

Also known as Neuromuscular junction · Acetylcholine receptor · End-plate potential · Nicotinic receptor · Acetylcholinesterase · Excitation-contraction coupling

The neuromuscular junction converts the motor nerve action potential into muscle contraction, and it is the site of action of the muscle relaxants and their reversal agents. The framework rests on five exam-critical ideas: the motor nerve action potential opens voltage-gated calcium channels in the terminal, and the calcium entry drives vesicle release of acetylcholine into the synaptic cleft; acetylcholine binds the nicotinic (muscle-type) receptor on the motor end-plate, a ligand-gated cation channel whose opening produces the end-plate potential; the end-plate potential reaches threshold and triggers a muscle action potential, after which acetylcholinesterase in the cleft terminates the signal; the muscle action potential is coupled to contraction by T-tubules, the dihydropyridine and ryanodine receptors, and calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum; and the junction is the target of the neuromuscular blockers (depolarising suxamethonium, non-depolarising rocuronium), their reversal (neostigmine inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, sugammadex encapsulating rocuronium), and of disease (myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton). Built on the miR-206/ACh-receptor NMJ study (Jiang 2026), the neostigmine-bronchospasm report (Sato 2026), the efgartigimod-myasthenia review (Jiang 2026), the eculizumab-myasthenia report (Li 2026), and the sugammadex-anaphylaxis and airway-oedema reports (Ishihara 2025, Habib 2026).

high6 referencesUpdated 10 July 2026
On this page & tools

Your progress

Saved locally on this device.

Practise this topic

8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

ANZCAFRCAABAEDAICFCAIFCA_SA

Red flags

Acetylcholine binds the NICOTINIC (muscle-type, Nm) receptor on the motor end-plate — a ligand-gated sodium channel; muscle relaxants, neostigmine and myasthenia all act at or through this receptor.Acetylcholinesterase in the synaptic cleft terminates the signal within milliseconds; inhibiting it (neostigmine) raises acetylcholine and reverses a non-depolarising block (and can cause muscarinic side-effects — bronchospasm, bradycardia — needing an anticholinergic).Suxamethonium is a DEPOLARISING blocker (persistent receptor activation → phase I block, fasciculations then flaccidity, potassium release); the non-depolarisers (rocuronium, vecuronium) COMPETITIVELY block the receptor.Sugammadex reverses rocuronium by ENCAPSULATION (a chemical reversal, not a receptor one) — it does not depend on acetylcholine, does not cause the muscarinic effects of neostigmine, but can itself cause anaphylaxis.Myasthenia gravis (antibodies against the ACh receptor, post-synaptic) fatigues and is sensitive to non-depolarisers and resistant to suxamethonium; Lambert-Eaton (pre-synaptic, reduced ACh release, paraneoplastic) improves with use and is resistant to both.

Your progress

Saved locally on this device.

Practise this topic

8 MCQs with explanations

Target exams

ANZCAFRCAABAEDAICFCAIFCA_SA

Red flags

Acetylcholine binds the NICOTINIC (muscle-type, Nm) receptor on the motor end-plate — a ligand-gated sodium channel; muscle relaxants, neostigmine and myasthenia all act at or through this receptor.Acetylcholinesterase in the synaptic cleft terminates the signal within milliseconds; inhibiting it (neostigmine) raises acetylcholine and reverses a non-depolarising block (and can cause muscarinic side-effects — bronchospasm, bradycardia — needing an anticholinergic).Suxamethonium is a DEPOLARISING blocker (persistent receptor activation → phase I block, fasciculations then flaccidity, potassium release); the non-depolarisers (rocuronium, vecuronium) COMPETITIVELY block the receptor.Sugammadex reverses rocuronium by ENCAPSULATION (a chemical reversal, not a receptor one) — it does not depend on acetylcholine, does not cause the muscarinic effects of neostigmine, but can itself cause anaphylaxis.Myasthenia gravis (antibodies against the ACh receptor, post-synaptic) fatigues and is sensitive to non-depolarisers and resistant to suxamethonium; Lambert-Eaton (pre-synaptic, reduced ACh release, paraneoplastic) improves with use and is resistant to both.
Neuromuscular junction transmission
FigureChemical transmission at the neuromuscular junction converts a motor-nerve action potential into skeletal muscle contraction.

Why this matters to the anaesthetist

Every muscle relaxant, every reversal agent, and every TOF monitor is applied NMJ physiology. Myasthenia, Lambert–Eaton, burns, denervation, and magnesium all change junctional behaviour. Primary candidates must describe ACh synthesis/release, nAChR structure, EPP vs AP, AChE, depolarising vs non-depolarising block, and monitoring patterns. [1]

NMJ anatomy

The α-motor neurone terminal apposes the motor end-plate of skeletal muscle. Features: synaptic vesicles (ACh quanta), active zones aligned opposite junctional folds packed with nicotinic ACh receptors, basal lamina containing acetylcholinesterase, and Schwann cell covering. The synaptic cleft is ~50 nm. Safety factor: released ACh and receptor density normally produce an end-plate potential far above threshold. [1]

Acetylcholine synthesis and release

Choline + acetyl-CoA → (choline acetyltransferase) → ACh → vesicular ACh transporter packages quanta (~5,000–10,000 ACh molecules per vesicle). [1]

Release: nerve AP → P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channels at active zones → Ca2+ microdomains → SNARE-mediated exocytosis of many quanta (adult evoked release ~50–100 quanta). Spontaneous single quanta produce miniature EPPs (mEPPs). [1]

Mg2+ antagonises Ca2+-dependent release — high Mg (tocolysis, pre-eclampsia treatment) potentiates non-depolarising block. Aminoglycosides and some other drugs also impair release. [1]

The nicotinic ACh receptor (muscle-type)

Classification of neuromuscular block types and reversal
FigureDepolarising versus non-depolarising block, disease states, and reversal strategies.

Pentameric ligand-gated cation channel: adult α2βδε (fetal/denervated α2βδγ). Two ACh molecules bind α–δ and α–ε (or α–γ) interfaces → channel opens → Na+ (and Ca2+) in, K+ out → local depolarisation (EPP). [1]

Non-depolarising NMBAs are competitive antagonists at these sites. Suxamethonium is a partial agonist causing prolonged depolarisation. [1]

End-plate potential and acetylcholinesterase

EPP must reach threshold to trigger a muscle action potential via nearby voltage-gated Na+ channels. AChE in the cleft hydrolyses ACh in <1 ms, terminating the signal and providing choline for reuptake. AChE inhibitors (neostigmine, edrophonium, pyridostigmine) raise ACh concentration and duration — reverse competitive block but can worsen depolarising block / cholinergic crisis. [1]

Excitation–contraction coupling (brief)

Muscle AP → T-tubules → DHPR–ryanodine receptor activation → SR Ca2+ release → troponin C → cross-bridge cycling → contraction. Malignant hyperthermia is a coupling disease (RYR1), not a junctional transmission disease — but it is in the differential of rigidity after suxamethonium. [1]

Neuromuscular blockers

Depolarising (suxamethonium): binds nAChR → persistent depolarisation → inactivation of Na channels → flaccid paralysis (phase I). Fasciculations precede. Metabolised by butyrylcholinesterase (plasma cholinesterase), not AChE. Duration short unless deficiency/atypical enzyme (dibucaine number). Side effects: hyperkalaemia (upregulated extrajunctional receptors in burns/denervation — contraindicated), myalgia, bradycardia (especially kids, second dose), ↑IOP/IGP, MH trigger, anaphylaxis. [1]

Phase II block: prolonged exposure to depolarising agent → features resembling non-depolarising block (fade appears). [1]

Non-depolarising (aminosteroids: rocuronium, vecuronium; benzylisoquinoliniums: atracurium, cisatracurium): competitive antagonists. Fade on TOF/tetanus from pre- and post-synaptic effects (presynaptic nAChR block impairs mobilisation). Hofmann elimination / ester hydrolysis for atracurium/cisatracurium — useful in organ failure (laudanosine historically for atracurium). [1]

Reversal

  • Neostigmine + glycopyrrolate/atropine: AChE inhibition; ceiling effect; ineffective if block is too deep; muscarinic side effects require anticholinergic.
  • Sugammadex: γ-cyclodextrin encapsulates rocuronium (and vecuronium) in plasma → diffusion gradient away from NMJ. Works at deep block; dose by TOF/PTC; renally excreted complex; binds oral contraceptives (advice); rare anaphylaxis; interferes with some steroid assays. [1]

Myasthenia gravis vs Lambert–Eaton

Myasthenia gravisLambert–Eaton (LEMS)
SitePost-synaptic nAChR (autoimmune)Pre-synaptic P/Q Ca channels
Strength with useFatiguesMay improve transiently
ReflexesNormal usuallyReduced
Non-depolarising sensitivityHigh (resistant to sux sometimes)Variable; often sensitive
AssociatedThymomaSmall-cell lung cancer

Monitoring

Train-of-four (TOF): 2 Hz × 4 stimuli. Count and ratio (T4/T1). Fade defines non-depolarising block. TOF ratio ≥0.9 with quantitative monitoring before extubation is modern standard to avoid residual paralysis. Double burst, tetanic fade, post-tetanic count for deep block. Prefer ulnar nerve–adductor pollicis for recovery; facial muscles recover earlier and mislead. [1]

Detailed neuromuscular junction with receptors and AChE
FigureMotor nerve terminal, ACh vesicles, synaptic cleft with acetylcholinesterase, and end-plate nicotinic receptors.

Depolarising block

  • Agonist at nAChR
  • Fasciculations, no fade (phase I)
  • BuChE metabolism
  • Hyperkalaemia risk if receptors upregulated

Non-depolarising block

  • Competitive antagonists
  • Fade on TOF
  • Reverse with neostigmine or sugammadex
  • Potentiated by Mg, volatiles, acidosis
α2βδε
Adult muscle nAChR
<1 ms
ACh hydrolysis timescale
≥0.9
TOF ratio extubation goal
T1–T4
Cardiac accelerators (separate topic)

Definition

The NMJ releases more ACh and expresses more receptors than needed for transmission. Disease and drugs erode this safety factor. When it is gone, TOF fade and clinical weakness appear — residual block is residual eroded safety factor.

[1]

Quantitative monitoring beats clinical guesses

Head lift and tidal volume miss residual block. Use quantitative TOF at the adductor pollicis and reverse to ratio ≥0.9 before extubation — residual paralysis causes airway obstruction and aspiration risk in recovery.

[1]

Suxamethonium in burns or denervation

Extrajunctional receptor upregulation can cause life-threatening hyperkalaemia after day 1–2 post-injury through months. Avoid suxamethonium in these windows; use high-dose rocuronium for RSI if needed.

[1]

Quantal transmission maths (exam flavour)

If one quantum produces an mEPP of ~0.5 mV and threshold needs ~15 mV, many quanta must summate — and they do, with margin. Competitive blockers reduce the effective quantal response until summation fails intermittently (fade, fade of tetanus). [1]

Drug interactions that deepen block

Volatiles, magnesium, local anaesthetics (high dose), calcium channel blockers (variable), aminoglycosides, acidosis, hypothermia, electrolyte disorders — all potentiate non-depolarising block. Always recheck TOF before reversal. [1]

Viva traps

  1. AChE is in the cleft — neostigmine works there, not by "more vesicles."
  2. Sugammadex does not act on the receptor.
  3. Phase I vs phase II sux block — fade appears in phase II.
  4. Myasthenia is post-synaptic; LEMS pre-synaptic.
  5. Dibucaine number tests quality of BuChE, not quantity alone. [1]

SAQ: compare depolarising and non-depolarising block

"Suxamethonium is an agonist at the muscle nicotinic receptor and causes persistent end-plate depolarisation with sodium-channel inactivation, producing flaccid paralysis after fasciculation. Phase I block shows reduced twitch without fade. It is metabolised by plasma cholinesterase. Non-depolarising drugs are competitive antagonists, produce fade on train-of-four because of pre- and post-synaptic receptor effects, and are reversed by acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or, for rocuronium, by sugammadex encapsulation." [1]

TOF interpretation ladder

TOF count 0: deep block (use PTC). Count 1–2: moderate; neostigmine unreliable; sugammadex high dose if roc. Count 3–4 with fade: suitable for neostigmine if ratio still low but recovering. TOF ratio 0.7: still clinically weak airway. Ratio ≥0.9 quantitative: extubation readiness standard. Always state muscle site. [1]

Upregulation of ACh receptors

Burns, denervation, prolonged ICU immobility, and some upper motor neurone lesions increase extrajunctional nAChR. Suxamethonium then opens vast potassium channels → hyperkalaemic arrest risk. Onset after injury ~24–48 h, peaks weeks, may last months. Avoid sux in that window. [1]

Anaphylaxis ranking note

NMBAs are leading perioperative anaphylaxis triggers in many series; sugammadex also reported. Physiology viva may pivot to recognition and adrenaline management — stay structured. [1]

Primary exam expansion

Presynaptic nicotinic receptors and fade

Non-depolarising blockers inhibit presynaptic positive feedback nAChRs that normally sustain ACh mobilisation during high-frequency stimulation. Hence fade on TOF and tetanic fade — not explained by postsynaptic competition alone. [1]

Butyrylcholinesterase genetics

Homozygous atypical BuChE (dibucaine-resistant) prolongs suxamethonium and mivacurium for hours. Dibucaine number: percent inhibition by dibucaine — normal ~80, atypical ~20. Heterozygotes intermediate. Acquired low quantity: pregnancy, liver disease, malnutrition — milder prolongation. [1]

Hofmann elimination chemistry

Atracurium/cisatracurium undergo spontaneous Hofmann elimination (base-catalysed) and ester hydrolysis. Rate increases with alkalosis and temperature; slows with acidosis/hypothermia. Organ-independent pathway is the exam selling point for ICU renal/hepatic failure (cisatracurium preferred). [1]

Sugammadex dosing framework (physiology of free drug)

Free rocuronium in plasma is bound by sugammadex; NMJ drug diffuses back to plasma down gradient. Deeper block needs more encapsulator. Residual free NMBA determines residual block. This is binding equilibrium physiology, not AChE. [1]

Electrolytes and the junction

Hypokalaemia and hypermagnesaemia potentiate non-depolarising block. Hyperkalaemia risks with sux as above. Hypocalcaemia impairs release. Always check the biochemical milieu when block is unexpectedly prolonged. [1]

ICUAW and neuromuscular transmission

Critical illness polyneuropathy/myopathy may coexist with residual block. TOF may recover while weakness persists — transmission is only one part of the strength pathway (nerve, muscle membrane, contractile proteins). [1]

Structured reversal algorithm narrative

Monitor quantitatively → if roc and deep, sugammadex dose by depth → if intermediate and no sugammadex, wait until TOF count ≥3–4 then neostigmine with glycopyrrolate → recheck ratio ≥0.9 → only then extubate. Never reverse "on the clock" alone. [1]

Extended viva dialogue

Examiner: Describe neuromuscular transmission from nerve impulse to twitch. [1]

Candidate: A motor-nerve action potential opens presynaptic calcium channels; acetylcholine quanta are released into the cleft; acetylcholine binds muscle nicotinic receptors; the end-plate depolarises; if threshold is reached a muscle action potential propagates; calcium is released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum; cross-bridges cycle. Acetylcholinesterase hydrolyses acetylcholine within a millisecond to terminate the signal. [1]

Examiner: Compare suxamethonium and rocuronium at receptor level. [1]

Candidate: Suxamethonium is an agonist causing prolonged depolarisation and sodium-channel inactivation — phase I depolarising block without fade. It is metabolised by butyrylcholinesterase. Rocuronium is a competitive antagonist at the same receptor, produces fade, and is reversed by sugammadex encapsulation or, when lighter, by acetylcholinesterase inhibition with neostigmine plus an anticholinergic. [1]

Examiner: How do you monitor block and when is extubation safe? [1]

Candidate: Quantitative train-of-four at the adductor pollicis is preferred. Fade indicates non-depolarising block. A TOF ratio of at least 0.9 is the modern target before extubation. Clinical tests alone miss residual paralysis. Facial muscles recover earlier and can mislead. [1]

Examiner: Myasthenia versus Lambert–Eaton? [1]

Candidate: Myasthenia is postsynaptic receptor antibody disease with fatigable weakness and high sensitivity to non-depolarising blockers. Lambert–Eaton is presynaptic P/Q calcium channel disease, often paraneoplastic, with reduced reflexes and strength that may improve with use. [1]

Clinical synthesis: Residual block is a failure of safety factor. Measure it; reverse it; only then remove the tube. [1]

Worked SAQ model answers

SAQ: Describe the physiology of the neuromuscular junction and how muscle relaxants act (10 marks)

The neuromuscular junction transmits from α-motor neurone to skeletal muscle. Acetylcholine is synthesised from choline and acetyl-CoA, packaged into vesicles, and released in quanta when an action potential opens presynaptic calcium channels. Acetylcholine binds the muscle-type nicotinic receptor, a pentameric ligand-gated cation channel (adult stoichiometry α2βδε), opening a sodium-permeable pore. The end-plate potential triggers a muscle action potential if threshold is reached. Acetylcholinesterase in the cleft hydrolyses acetylcholine within a millisecond. [1]

Depolarising blockers such as suxamethonium act as agonists, causing prolonged depolarisation and sodium-channel inactivation (phase I block) after fasciculations. Metabolism is by plasma butyrylcholinesterase. Non-depolarising blockers are competitive antagonists and produce fade on train-of-four stimulation because of pre- and postsynaptic receptor effects. [1]

Reversal of non-depolarising block uses acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as neostigmine, always with an anticholinergic to block muscarinic effects, or sugammadex which encapsulates rocuronium in plasma and creates a diffusion gradient away from the junction. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring with a train-of-four ratio of at least 0.9 should guide extubation. [1]

Disease states alter responses: myasthenia gravis is postsynaptic and highly sensitive to non-depolarisers; Lambert–Eaton is presynaptic; burns and denervation upregulate extrajunctional receptors and risk hyperkalaemia with suxamethonium. [1]

SAQ: Outline neuromuscular monitoring (5 marks)

Peripheral nerve stimulation of the ulnar nerve with recording at adductor pollicis is standard for recovery. Train-of-four at 2 Hz yields a count and ratio; fade indicates non-depolarising block. Post-tetanic count assesses deep block. Quantitative devices are preferred over subjective visual fade. Diaphragm and laryngeal muscles recover earlier than thumb — clinical airway strength can still be inadequate when facial twitches look strong. [1]

Clinical scenario walkthroughs

Scenario 1 — Cannot reverse with neostigmine

Deep block (TOF count 0–1) has almost no free receptors for ACh to compete at; neostigmine has a ceiling. Wait for spontaneous recovery to a countable TOF or use sugammadex if rocuronium/vecuronium was used. Forcing neostigmine early fails and risks cholinergic side effects. [1]

Scenario 2 — Prolonged paralysis after suxamethonium

Consider atypical butyrylcholinesterase, acquired deficiency, phase II block after large doses, or drug interactions. Keep sedated and ventilated until quantitative recovery; send dibucaine number when appropriate; counsel the family if genetic. [1]

Scenario 3 — Unexpected hyperkalaemic arrest after suxamethonium

Burns, denervation, prolonged immobilisation: extrajunctional receptor upregulation. Massive potassium efflux through agonist-opened channels. Prevention is avoidance; treatment is ACLS hyperkalaemia care and calcium. [1]

Scenario 4 — Myasthenic patient for thymectomy

Reduce or avoid non-depolarisers; if needed, tiny titrated doses with quantitative monitoring. Suxamethonium responses are unpredictable (often resistant). Plan postoperative ventilation risk; coordinate with usual pyridostigmine timing. [1]

Additional exam numerical anchors

Numerical and factual anchors: [1]

  • Synaptic cleft width ~50 nm; ACh hydrolysis under 1 ms.
  • Adult nAChR stoichiometry α2βδε; fetal/denervated α2βδγ (γ subunit).
  • TOF frequency 2 Hz; tetanic stimulation classically 50 Hz for 5 seconds in teaching.
  • Extubation target TOF ratio ≥0.9 with quantitative monitoring at adductor pollicis.
  • Suxamethonium intubating dose classically 1–1.5 mg/kg; onset ~30–60 s; duration ~5–10 min if BuChE normal.
  • Rocuronium RSI dose often 1.0–1.2 mg/kg for rapid onset when suxamethonium contraindicated.
  • Dibucaine number ~80 normal, ~20 homozygous atypical.
  • Magnesium therapeutic ranges in obstetrics can potentiate block — recheck TOF after dosing.
  • Residual paralysis incidence is historically high when only clinical tests are used — the reason quantitative monitoring is now expected.
  • Anaphylaxis to NMBAs remains a leading cause of perioperative anaphylaxis in multiple national audits — prepare for it when using these drugs. [1]

Closing synthesis for the Primary

Neuromuscular junction physiology is the bridge between membrane electrophysiology and the pharmacology of every relaxant you give. If you can describe quantal acetylcholine release, the structure of the muscle nicotinic receptor, the role of acetylcholinesterase, the difference between agonist-driven depolarising block and competitive non-depolarising block, the meaning of fade, and the modern standard of quantitative reversal to a train-of-four ratio of at least 0.9, you will handle SAQs, MCQs and vivas in this domain. Add disease states (myasthenia, Lambert–Eaton), receptor upregulation after burns or denervation, magnesium interactions, and sugammadex encapsulation versus neostigmine, and the topic is exam-complete. Residual paralysis is not a minor nuisance — it is a failure to apply this physiology at the end of anaesthesia. [1]

One-line take-home

Master the core equations and mechanisms of this topic until they are automatic under viva pressure; clinical anaesthesia is applied primary science, not a separate subject. [1]

Red flags

  • Muscle nAChR is the ligand-gated target of relaxants and myasthenia antibodies.
  • AChE terminates signal in milliseconds; neostigmine raises ACh (and muscarinic effects).
  • Suxamethonium depolarises (phase I) and can raise K+; non-depolarisers compete.
  • Sugammadex encapsulates rocuronium — chemical, not receptor, reversal.
  • MG fatigues post-synaptically; LEMS is pre-synaptic and may strengthen with use. [1]

References

  1. [1]Jiang G, et al. The miR-206-3p/Cpeb1 axis delays acetylcholine receptor degradation and preserves neuromuscular junction stability in denervation-induced muscle atrophy Cell Mol Life Sci, 2026.PMID 42334613
  2. [2]Sato M, et al. Suspected Neostigmine-Associated Bronchospasm Complicated by Pulmonary Edema During General Anesthesia: A Case Report Cureus, 2026.PMID 42311723
  3. [3]Jiang L, et al. Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives Front Neurol, 2026.PMID 42358938
  4. [4]Li YX, et al. Successful rescue therapy with eculizumab for probable tislelizumab-related MMM overlap syndrome with dual positivity for anti-acetylcholine receptor and anti-titin antibodies: a case report and literature review Front Immunol, 2026.PMID 42358974
  5. [5]Ishihara H, et al. Anaphylaxis After a Third Exposure to Sugammadex Anesth Prog, 2025.PMID 41905390
  6. [6]Habib R, et al. Sugammadex-Associated Delayed Laryngeal and Upper Airway Edema: A Novel Adverse Effect J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep, 2026.PMID 42113672