Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

EM TopicsGeriatric trauma

EM · Geriatric trauma

Geriatric trauma

The geriatric trauma: the physiological changes of aging, the comorbidity and the polypharmacy (the anticoagulants, the beta-blockers that mask the tachycardia), the low-energy fall that produces the significant injury, the increased TBI risk, the frailty assessment, and the higher mortality for the same injury.

medium7 referencesUpdated 2 July 2026
On this page & tools

Your progress

Saved locally on this device.

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEMFRCPCCCFPEMEBEEM

Red flags

The elderly patient on a beta-blocker may not mount the tachycardic response to the shock — the heart rate is an unreliable signThe atrophic brain has more space for the subdural to accumulate — the head CT is obtained liberally after the fallThe anticoagulated patient with the head injury has the elevated ICH risk — the early reversal and the CTA ground-level fall in the elderly can produce the significant injury — the mechanism alone does not determine the severityThe frailty, not the chronological age, predicts the outcome — the Clinical Frailty Scale guides the decisionA 'normal' blood pressure in the elderly trauma patient may be the shock — the hypertensive's baseline rises with the age, so the SBP of 110 is the relative hypotensionThe elderly rib-fracture patient has the 10 to 20 per cent mortality — the rib fracture in the elderly is the significant injury, not the minor oneThe serial GCS and the repeat CT — the delayed subdural expansion in the anticoagulated elderly presents at 24 to 48 h after the seemingly minor fallThe lactate and the base deficit, not the vital signs, reveal the occult hypoperfusion of the elderly trauma patientThe trauma team activation for the age over 65, even with the seemingly minor mechanism — the over-triage is the deliberate strategy in the geriatric trauma

Your progress

Saved locally on this device.

Target exams

ACEMFRCEMABEMFRCPCCCFPEMEBEEM

Red flags

The elderly patient on a beta-blocker may not mount the tachycardic response to the shock — the heart rate is an unreliable signThe atrophic brain has more space for the subdural to accumulate — the head CT is obtained liberally after the fallThe anticoagulated patient with the head injury has the elevated ICH risk — the early reversal and the CTA ground-level fall in the elderly can produce the significant injury — the mechanism alone does not determine the severityThe frailty, not the chronological age, predicts the outcome — the Clinical Frailty Scale guides the decisionA 'normal' blood pressure in the elderly trauma patient may be the shock — the hypertensive's baseline rises with the age, so the SBP of 110 is the relative hypotensionThe elderly rib-fracture patient has the 10 to 20 per cent mortality — the rib fracture in the elderly is the significant injury, not the minor oneThe serial GCS and the repeat CT — the delayed subdural expansion in the anticoagulated elderly presents at 24 to 48 h after the seemingly minor fallThe lactate and the base deficit, not the vital signs, reveal the occult hypoperfusion of the elderly trauma patientThe trauma team activation for the age over 65, even with the seemingly minor mechanism — the over-triage is the deliberate strategy in the geriatric trauma

The geriatric trauma is the injury of the patient over 65, and it is one of the fastest-growing presentations in the emergency department, as the population ages and the activity is maintained. The elderly patient is injured by the lower-energy mechanism (the ground-level fall) but suffers the higher-severity injury and the higher mortality than the younger patient with the same mechanism, because the physiological changes of aging and the comorbidity reduce the reserve. The Fellowship candidate must know the physiological changes, the polypharmacy effects, the atypical presentation, the frailty concept, and the principles that govern the management and the disposition of the injured elderly.[1][1]

An elderly patient being assessed after a fall
FigureThe geriatric trauma: the lower-energy mechanism, the higher-severity injury, the comorbidity and the frailty.

The physiological changes of aging

The aging alters every system in ways that affect the trauma management. The brain atrophies (the cortical volume shrinks, the subdural space enlarges), so the bridging veins are stretched and the minor head injury produces the subdural haematoma with more room to expand before the signs appear. The cardiovascular system stiffens (the less-compliant aorta, the fixed cardiac output), so the tachycardic response to the hypovolaemia is limited (and the beta-blocker or the pacemaker abolishes it entirely). The respiratory reserve falls (the reduced vital capacity, the reduced cough, the chest-wall stiffening), so the rib fracture that is minor in the young produces the pneumonia in the elderly. The renal function declines (the reduced GFR, the reduced concentrating ability), so the nephrotoxic contrast and the medications accumulate. The bone density falls (the osteoporosis), so the ground-level fall fractures the hip, the pelvis and the ribs.[1]

The SBP of 110 is the shock in the elderly hypertensive — the 'normal' blood pressure is the relative hypotension

The systolic blood pressure rises with the age (the stiffened, non-compliant aorta), so the elderly patient's baseline is commonly 150 to 170 mmHg. The systolic of 110 mmHg — well within the 'normal' adult range — is therefore the relative hypotension that signals the 20 to 30 per cent blood-volume loss in the elderly trauma patient, equivalent to the systolic of 80 mmHg in the young. The ATLS and the EAST geriatric guideline define the geriatric shock as the SBP below 110 mmHg, OR the SBP that is more than 30 mmHg below the patient's known baseline. The heart rate does not rise in compensation (the stiffened myocardium, the beta-blocker, the pacemaker), so the practitioner who waits for the tachycardia and the absolute hypotension misses the shock. The lactate and the base deficit — the markers of the anaerobic metabolism — are the reliable indicators of the occult hypoperfusion in the elderly trauma patient, and they are obtained on the arrival of every geriatric trauma patient, regardless of the vital signs.[1][1]
SystemThe change of agingThe trauma consequence
BrainThe cortical atrophy, the stretched bridging veins, the enlarged subdural spaceThe subdural haematoma from the minor head injury, the delayed presentation
CardiovascularThe stiffened aorta, the fixed cardiac output, the conduction diseaseThe absent tachycardia, the relative hypotension at the 'normal' SBP, the shock at the lower heart rate
RespiratoryThe reduced vital capacity, the weakened cough, the stiffened chest wallThe pneumonia, the atelectasis, the respiratory failure after the rib fracture
RenalThe reduced GFR, the reduced concentrating abilityThe accumulation of the contrast and the nephrotoxic drugs, the acute kidney injury
MusculoskeletalThe osteoporosis, the sarcopenia, the slow gaitThe hip, the pelvic and the rib fractures from the ground-level fall
IntegumentThe thin skin, the fragile subcutaneous vesselsThe extensive bruising, the torn bridging veins, the large scalp haematoma
ImmuneThe blunted febrile response, the reduced T-cell functionThe atypical presentation of the sepsis (the confusion, the fall), the delayed diagnosis

The comorbidity and the polypharmacy

The elderly patient carries the comorbidity (the hypertension, the diabetes, the ischaemic heart disease, the COPD, the chronic kidney disease) and the medications that interact with the trauma. The anticoagulants (the warfarin, the DOACs) increase the risk and the severity of the intracranial and the intra-abdominal bleeding and require the early reversal.[2] The beta-blockers prevent the tachycardic response to the shock, so the heart rate is an unreliable sign (the normal heart rate in the elderly patient on the beta-blocker does not exclude the 30 per cent blood-volume loss). The ACE inhibitors and the diuretics cause the postural hypotension and the electrolyte disturbance (and may be the cause of the fall). The polypharmacy interacts with the anaesthesia, the analgesia and the resuscitation drugs.

The beta-blocker is the confounder of the shock — the heart rate of 80 in the bleeding elderly is the tachycardia

The beta-blocker (and the non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker, and the permanent pacemaker) abolishes the compensatory tachycardia that the hypovolaemic patient mounts. The elderly patient on the metoprolol who is bleeding from the pelvic fracture may present with the heart rate of 75 — the 'normal' rate that is, in fact, the inappropriately normal rate for the shock. The shock index (the heart rate divided by the systolic blood pressure) loses its utility, and the age-adjusted shock index and the delta heart rate (the change from the baseline) are the inferior but necessary substitutes. The lesson: the haemodynamic assessment of the elderly trauma patient is built on the blood pressure, the lactate, the base deficit and the mentation — never on the heart rate alone. The venous lactate over 2 mmol/L, the base deficit worse than minus 5, and the altered mentation are the markers that override the reassuring vital signs.[1][1]

The medication list is the cause and the confounder — ask 'why did this patient fall?'

The polypharmacy is both the cause of the fall and the confounder of the assessment. The antihypertensive polypharmacy (the ACE inhibitor, the diuretic, the alpha-blocker for the prostate) produces the orthostatic hypotension; the anticoagulant turns the minor subdural into the fatal one; the sedative (the benzodiazepine, the antipsychotic, the opioid) impairs the balance and the protective reflexes; the antihyperglycaemic produces the hypoglycaemia; the anti-Parkinsonian withdrawal precipitates the rigidity and the fall. The medication reconciliation on the arrival — the brown-bag review, the electronic medication list, the family interview — identifies both the reversible cause of the fall and the drugs that will complicate the resuscitation (the anticoagulant, the beta-blocker, the diuretic) and the disposition (the sedatives that prolong the delirium).[1]
Drug classThe trauma interactionThe action on the arrival
WarfarinThe elevated risk of the intracranial and the intra-abdominal bleed; the slow reversalThe INR, the early PCC + vitamin K, the haematology consult
DOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran)The elevated bleed risk; the uncertain reversal; the unreliable routine coagulation testsThe specific reversal (idarucizumab, andexanet), the anti-Xa or the thrombin time, the timing of the last dose
Antiplatelet (aspirin, clopidogrel)The modestly elevated ICH risk; the platelet dysfunctionThe platelet transfusion is not routine (it does not help and may harm in the spontaneous ICH); consider in the TBI
Beta-blockerThe absent tachycardia; the masked shock; the negative inotropyThe lactate, the base deficit; the cautious fluid; do not stop abruptly (the rebound ischaemia)
ACE inhibitor / diureticThe volume depletion, the orthostasis, the AKI with the contrastThe fluid assessment, the electrolytes, the renal dosing of the drugs
Sedative / opioidThe fall, the delirium, the respiratory depressionThe reversible-cause workup; the delirium screen; the cautious dosing
Abstract illustration of multiple pill bottles representing polypharmacy
FigureThe polypharmacy: the anticoagulants bleed, the beta-blockers mask the tachycardia, the diuretics deplete the volume.

The mechanism and the injury pattern

The ground-level fall is the major mechanism in the elderly — do not under-triage

The ground-level fall (the fall from the standing height) is the mechanism in over 80 per cent of the geriatric trauma, and it produces the mortality that rivals the motor-vehicle collision in the young. The 75-year-old who trips on the curb and strikes the head may have the subdural haematoma, the cervical-spine fracture, and the three rib fractures — the same injuries that the 25-year-old sustains in the high-speed crash. The under-triage (the failure to activate the trauma team, the discharge from the triage, the missed injury) is the single most preventable cause of the geriatric trauma death. The EAST geriatric guideline and the ACS field-triage criteria therefore mandate the lower threshold for the full trauma-team activation in the patient over 65: the anticoagulant, the ground-level fall with the head strike, the systolic below 110, the altered mentation, and the rib fractures all trigger the activation, regardless of the apparent mechanism severity. The over-triage (the activation for the patient who turns out to be uninjured) is the acceptable cost; the under-triage is the harm.[1]

The ground-level fall from the standing height is the most common mechanism of the geriatric trauma (the trip, the slip, the syncopal episode), and it produces the hip fracture, the head injury and the rib fracture. The practitioner who dismisses the mechanism as minor misses the significant injury — the mechanism alone does not determine the severity in the elderly. The motor-vehicle collision and the pedestrian struck produce the multi-system injury. The injury pattern reflects the fragile skeleton and the reduced reserve: the TBI (the atrophic brain, the anticoagulant), the rib fractures with the respiratory failure (the osteoporosis, the reduced reserve), the hip and the pelvic fractures (the osteoporosis), the cervical-spine injury (the degenerative spine, the stenosis), and the occult injury (the delayed presentation, the atypical symptom — the confusion instead of the pain).[1][1]

The TBI, the anticoagulation and the reversal therapy

The TBI in the elderly is more frequent, more severe and more likely to require the surgical intervention. The atrophic brain provides the subdural space for the venous bleed to accumulate, and the signs may be delayed or subtle (the confusion, the gradual decline, rather than the rapid deterioration). The anticoagulated patient with the head injury has the significantly elevated risk of the intracranial haemorrhage, so the head CT is obtained liberally after the fall and the reversal of the anticoagulant is started early if the ICH is confirmed: the 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate at 25 to 50 units/kg with the vitamin K 5 to 10 mg intravenously for the warfarin; the idarucizumab 5 g (two 2.5 g vials) for the dabigatran; and the andexanet alfa — the low dose 400 mg or the high dose 800 mg bolus — for the apixaban and the rivaroxaban, with the PCC as the alternative where the andexanet is unavailable.[2][1]

The subdural is the venous bleed of the stretched bridging vein — the slow, the delayed, the insidious

The subdural haematoma of the elderly arises from the torn bridging vein (the vein that traverses the subdural space from the cortical surface to the dural venous sinus). The atrophic brain shrinks away from the skull, lengthening and stretching these bridging veins, so the trivial head movement (the fall, the head-check in the car) tears them. The venous bleed is slower than the arterial (epidural) bleed, and the atrophic brain has the extra subdural space to accommodate the first 50 to 100 millilitres without the mass effect — hence the lucid interval and the delayed presentation. The elderly subdural presents days to weeks after the forgotten fall, with the confusion, the gradual decline, the hemiparesis or the seizure — not with the rapid coma of the epidural. The CT is obtained for any head strike in the elderly, and again at 24 hours for the anticoagulated patient with the initial negative scan, because the delayed expansion is the well-described event.[1]

The anticoagulated elderly with the head strike has the ICH until the CT proves otherwise — scan liberally, reverse early

The patient on the warfarin or the DOAC who falls and strikes the head has the risk of the intracranial haemorrhage that is several-fold higher than the non-anticoagulated patient, and the bleed is larger, the progression is faster, and the mortality is higher. The Canadian CT head rule and the New Orleans criteria do not apply to the anticoagulated patient — the anticoagulant is the independent indication for the CT, regardless of the loss of consciousness, the GCS, or the symptom. The reversal is started on the suspicion of the ICH (before the radiology confirmation) in the unstable patient, and immediately on the CT confirmation of the bleed: the principle is that the reversal agent is faster to give than the neurosurgical catastrophe is to recover from. The last dose and the time of the anticoagulant are documented (the pharmacokinetic tail of the apixaban is 12 hours, the warfarin is days), and the consultation with the haematology and the neurosurgery is simultaneous.[2]

The reversal of the anticoagulant in the geriatric trauma — the agent, the dose, and the speed

The reversal strategy is dictated by the specific anticoagulant. The warfarin is reversed by the 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) at 25 to 50 units per kilogram intravenously (the dose is based on the INR and the weight), together with the vitamin K 5 to 10 milligrams intravenously (slowly, over 20 minutes, to avoid the anaphylactoid reaction) — the 4F-PCC reverses the INR within minutes, and the vitamin K sustains the reversal over the 6 to 12 hours (the PCC is consumed; the vitamin K restores the hepatic synthesis). The dabigatran is reversed by the idarucizumab 5 grams (two 2.5-gram vials) intravenously — the monoclonal antibody fragment that binds the dabigatran with the 350-fold higher affinity than the thrombin. The apixaban and the rivaroxaban are reversed by the andexanet alfa (the low dose 400 milligrams bolus then 4 milligrams per minute for 120 minutes, or the high dose 800 milligrams bolus then 8 milligrams per minute for 120 minutes, based on the dose and the timing of the last factor-Xa inhibitor), with the 4F-PCC as the alternative where the andexanet is unavailable. The heparin is reversed by the protamine sulfate (1 milligram per 100 units of the heparin, up to 50 milligrams).[2][3][4]

AnticoagulantThe reversal agentThe doseThe speed of onset
Warfarin (INR elevated)4F-PCC + vitamin K4F-PCC 25–50 units/kg IV; vitamin K 5–10 mg IV over 20 minMinutes (PCC); the vitamin K sustains
DabigatranIdarucizumab5 g IV (two 2.5 g vials), as two bolusesMinutes (the 100% reversal of the dilute thrombin time)
Apixaban / rivaroxabanAndexanet alfa (or 4F-PCC)Low dose 400 mg bolus + 4 mg/min × 120 min; high dose 800 mg bolus + 8 mg/min × 120 minMinutes (the 89–93% reduction of the anti-Xa)
Unfractionated heparinProtamine sulfate1 mg per 100 units heparin (max 50 mg), slow IVMinutes
Enoxaparin (LMWH)Protamine sulfate (partial)1 mg per 1 mg enoxaparin (within 8 h); ~60% neutralisationPartial
Antiplatelet (aspirin, clopidogrel)Desmopressin / platelet transfusion (selective)Not routine; considered in the TBI with the ongoing bleedVariable; the evidence is weak

The anticoagulated elderly with the head injury — the reversal in steps

1

Recognise and resuscitate

The ABCDE; the cervical spine; the GCS and the pupils. The fall with the head strike in the patient on any anticoagulant is the indication for the immediate head CT. The two large-bore cannulae, the blood group and the crossmatch, the venous lactate and the coagulation profile (the INR, the anti-Xa, the thrombin time, the platelets), and the haematology and the neurosurgery consult are activated in parallel with the imaging.

2

CT head — the decision point

The non-contrast CT head is the decisive test. The intracranial haemorrhage (the subdural, the epidural, the intraparenchymal, the subarachnoid, the intraventricular) on the anticoagulated patient is the indication for the immediate reversal. The negative CT in the anticoagulated patient with the persistent symptom (the confusion, the headache, the focal deficit) mandates the repeat CT at 6 to 24 hours, because the delayed expansion is the well-described event.

3

Reverse the specific agent

The warfarin: the 4F-PCC 25–50 units/kg plus the vitamin K 5–10 mg IV. The dabigatran: the idarucizumab 5 g IV. The apixaban or rivaroxaban: the andexanet alfa (the low or the high dose by the timing) or the 4F-PCC where the andexanet is unavailable. The reversal is given within minutes of the CT confirmation — the delay is the preventable harm. The tranexamic acid 1 gram is given if the massive transfusion protocol is activated.<Cite id="2" />

4

Neurosurgical referral and the disposition

The neurosurgical referral is made immediately for the surgical evacuation (the subdural over 10 mm or the midline shift over 5 mm, the declining GCS, the pupillary asymmetry). The ICU admission for the serial GCS (hourly), the repeat CT at 6 and 24 hours, the blood-pressure control (the systolic below 160 to limit the haematoma expansion), and the seizure prophylaxis in the selected case. The anticoagulation is held; the decision to restart (and when) is the multidisciplinary one, balancing the thrombotic and the bleeding risk.

5

Find and treat the cause of the fall

The geriatric fall is the symptom, not the diagnosis. The syncope workup (the ECG, the orthostatic vitals, the cardiac monitoring), the metabolic workup (the glucose, the sodium, the calcium), the infection workup (the urine, the chest X-ray), and the medication review identify the reversible cause. The recurrence prevention (the pacemaker for the heart block, the dose adjustment of the antihypertensives, the physiotherapy and the home-safety assessment) begins in the hospital, not after the discharge.

RE-VERSE AD (Pollack, NEJM 2015) — idarucizumab for the dabigatran reversal

Design

Prospective cohort — 90 patients on dabigatran with the serious bleeding (group A) or the urgent procedure (group B)

Intervention

Idarucizumab 5 g IV (two 2.5 g vials)

Primary result

The maximum reversal of the dabigatran anticoagulant effect was 100% (the dilute thrombin time and the ecarin clotting time), within minutes of the administration

Key secondary

The haemostasis restored at the median of 11.4 hours; the unbound dabigatran remained below 20 ng/mL at 24 h in 79%

Bottom line

The idarucizumab completely and rapidly reverses the dabigatran — it is the specific antidote for the dabigatran-associated bleed. The thrombotic risk is real but small; the anticoagulation is restarted once the bleeding is controlled.

ANNEXA-4 (Connolly, NEJM 2016) — andexanet alfa for the factor-Xa inhibitor bleed

Design

Prospective, single-group — 67 patients with the acute major bleeding within 18 h of a factor-Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, enoxaparin); mean age 77 years

Intervention

Andexanet bolus followed by the 2-hour infusion (the low or the high dose)

Primary result

The anti-Xa activity reduced by 89% (rivaroxaban) and 93% (apixaban) after the bolus; the clinical haemostasis excellent or good in 79% at 12 h

Safety

The thrombotic events in 18% at 30 days — the rebound thrombosis is the real concern, and the anticoagulation is restarted early

Bottom line

The andexanet reverses the factor-Xa inhibitor and achieves the effective haemostasis, but the thrombotic rate is significant — the 4F-PCC remains the alternative, and the anticoagulation is restarted as soon as the bleeding permits.

The frailty and the disposition

The frailty (the reduced physiological reserve across the multiple systems, measured by the Clinical Frailty Scale or the trauma-specific frailty index) is a better predictor of the outcome than the chronological age or the Injury Severity Score. The frail patient has the higher mortality, the longer hospital stay, the higher complication rate and the higher discharge-to-the-facility rate for the same injury. [1]

The Clinical Frailty Scale (1 to 9) — the 30-second bedside score that predicts the outcome better than the age

The Clinical Frailty Scale (Rockwood) scores the pre-morbid functional state on the 1-to-9 scale: 1 very fit, 2 well, 3 managing well, 4 vulnerable, 5 mildly frail, 6 moderately frail, 7 severely frail, 8 very severely frail, 9 terminally ill. It takes 30 seconds to score at the bedside (the patient or the family report the pre-injury function: the independence, the mobility, the cognition, the activities of the daily living), and each one-point increment predicts the higher mortality, the longer stay, and the lower likelihood of the discharge home — the information that the chronological age and the Injury Severity Score do not provide. The frailty score guides the goals-of-care discussion (the fit 80-year-old at CFS 3 is resuscitated as the young adult; the frail 80-year-old at CFS 7 has the different conversation), and it is recorded on the arrival of every geriatric trauma patient.[6]
Abstract illustration of a frailty scale
FigureThe frailty, not the age, predicts the outcome — the Clinical Frailty Scale guides the management and the disposition.

The disposition: the elderly trauma patient is admitted more readily (the observation for the occult injury, the rib-fracture analgesia and the respiratory support, the anticoagulation reversal, the physiotherapy, the social support). The goals of care discussion is held early and honestly — the resuscitation that is appropriate for the fit 70-year-old may not be appropriate for the frail 90-year-old with the advanced dementia, and the family is involved in the shared decision-making.[1][1]

The rib fractures in the elderly — the significant injury, not the minor one

The rib fracture is the injury that the junior doctor dismisses and the experienced trauma surgeon fears, when the patient is over 65. The Bulger cohort (the elderly over 65 with the rib fractures at the level-1 trauma centre) demonstrated the mortality of 22 per cent in the elderly versus the 10 per cent in the young, and the pneumonia rate of 31 per cent versus the 17 per cent, for the same number of the rib fractures and the same Injury Severity Score. Each additional rib fracture increased the odds of the death by 19 per cent and the odds of the pneumonia by 16 per cent. The rib fracture in the elderly is therefore the high-stakes injury that demands the admission, the aggressive analgesia, and the respiratory support — the under-treatment of the pain is the direct path to the splinting, the atelectasis, the pneumonia, the respiratory failure, and the death.[5]

The 75-year-old with the three rib fractures is the high-mortality patient — admit, block, and the pulmonary toilet

The single rib fracture in the over-65 carries the mortality of 5 to 10 per cent; the three rib fractures raise the mortality to 20 per cent and the pneumonia rate to over 30 per cent. The admission is the default for the elderly with the rib fractures (the emergency-department observation unit is insufficient for the three or more fractures, the anticoagulated, or the chronic-lung-disease patient). The management is the trinity of the aggressive analgesia (the regional block — the serratus anterior plane, the erector spinae plane, or the thoracic epidural for the three or more fractures — to avoid the sedation and the respiratory depression of the opioid), the pulmonary toilet (the incentive spirometry, the coughing, the early mobilisation), and the the respiratory support (the high-flow oxygen, the non-invasive ventilation for the splinting and the hypoxia). The pain is reassessed hourly; the patient who cannot cough or take the deep breath is the patient heading for the pneumonia.[5]

The elderly rib-fracture management — the analgesia, the toilet, the escalation

1

The assessment and the admission

The mechanism, the rib count on the CT (the chest X-ray misses up to half of the the rib fractures, so the CT is the imaging of choice in the elderly chest trauma), the oxygenation, the chronic-lung-disease history, the anticoagulant status. The admission for the analgesia and the observation is the default in the patient over 65 with the rib fracture, especially the three or more, the anticoagulated, or the chronic-lung-disease.

2

The aggressive regional analgesia

The regional block (the serratus anterior plane block or the erector spinae plane block) is the transformative intervention — it blocks the somatic pain of the rib fractures without the sedation or the respiratory depression of the opioid, allowing the patient to breathe deeply and cough. The thoracic epidural is the gold standard for the severe flail chest or the bilateral fractures. The multimodal regimen (the paracetamol, the NSAID if no contraindication, the regional block, the cautious opioid via the PCA) is the baseline.

3

The pulmonary toilet and the monitoring

The incentive spirometry (the target tidal volume), the coughing and the deep breathing every hour, the early mobilisation (the chair on the day of the admission), the humidified oxygen. The pain score and the respiratory rate and the oxygen saturation are monitored hourly. The deterioration (the rising respiratory rate, the falling saturation, the fever, the rising inflammatory markers) triggers the chest X-ray and the blood cultures for the pneumonia.

4

The respiratory escalation

The non-invasive ventilation (the CPAP or the BiPAP) reduces the intubation rate in the elderly rib-fracture patient with the respiratory distress and the preserved mental state — it splints the chest, reduces the work of breathing, and improves the oxygenation. The intubation and the lung-protective ventilation (the low tidal volume) is reserved for the refractory hypoxaemia, the exhaustion, or the falling GCS. The high-flow nasal cannula is the intermediate option.

The pulmonary contusion worsens over 24 to 48 hours — the worsening is the expected, the restrictive fluid is the rule

The underlying pulmonary contusion (the alveolar haemorrhage and the capillary leak) accompanies the rib fracture in the elderly, and it worsens over the first 24 to 48 hours as the inflammatory cascade unfolds — the shunt, the hypoxaemia, and the falling compliance develop after the patient is admitted, not in the emergency department. The classical error is the over-resuscitation with the crystalloid, which turns the contused lung into the alveolar oedema (the capillary leak converts the extra fluid into the worsened gas exchange). The restrictive fluid strategy (the minimum to maintain the perfusion, the early blood products, the vasopressor for the mean arterial pressure) is the rule; the fluid balance and the lactate are monitored. The patient who looks well at the presentation may be the patient on the ventilator at 48 hours — the admission and the observation are not optional.[1]

The trauma team activation and the triage of the elderly — the over-triage is the strategy

The elderly trauma patient is the most under-triaged group in the trauma system, because the mechanism is judged 'minor' (the ground-level fall) and the vital signs are judged 'normal' (the SBP of 115, the heart rate of 78), and the patient is therefore routed to the low-acuity area, seen late, and the occult injury is missed. The EAST geriatric guideline and the ACS field-triage criteria mandate the lower threshold for the full trauma-team activation in the patient over 55 to 65: the systolic below 110 mmHg, the GCS below 15, the anticoagulant with any head strike, the rib fractures, the long-bone fracture, and the pedestrian struck — each is the standalone indication for the trauma-team activation, regardless of the apparent mechanism severity. The deliberate over-triage (the activation for the patient who turns out to be uninjured) is the acceptable cost; the under-triage (the missed activation) is the preventable death.[1]

The geriatric triage criteria — the systolic of 110 and the GCS of 14 are the activations, not the reassurances

The geriatric-specific trauma-activation criteria (the EAST and the ACS) are deliberately more sensitive than the adult criteria. The full trauma-team activation is triggered by: the age over 65 with the systolic below 110 (not the adult's 90), the GCS below 15 (not the adult's below 13), the anticoagulant with any head strike, the ground-level fall with the head strike, the rib fractures, the evidence of the shock (the lactate over 5, the base deficit worse than minus 6), or the pedestrian struck. The principle: the vital signs that reassure in the young adult are the activation criteria in the elderly, because the physiological reserve is lower and the deterioration is faster. The triage nurse who applies the adult criteria to the elderly patient misses the activation.[1][7]

The EMS medication history is unreliable for the DOAC — verify at the bedside, do not trust the 'no anticoagulant'

The pre-hospital and the triage assessment of the anticoagulant status in the elderly head-injury patient is notoriously unreliable: the warfarin is reasonably captured (the kappa of 0.76), but the DOAC, the aspirin, and the other antiplatelet are poorly ascertained (the kappa of 0.45, 0.33, and 0.51 respectively). The EMS report of 'no anticoagulant' in the elderly head-injury patient is therefore not the reassurance — the medication list is verified at the bedside (the pharmacy records, the electronic medication list, the family, the brown-bag review), and the CT head is obtained on the head strike regardless. The DOAC has no reliable rapid reversal-monitoring test (the INR is normal), so the threshold for the CT and the reversal is the history and the agent-specific assay (the anti-Xa, the thrombin time), not the routine coagulation screen.[7]

The occult hypoperfusion — the lactate, the base deficit, and the silent shock

The elderly trauma patient may be in the shock with the reassuring vital signs — the SBP of 120, the heart rate of 80 (on the beta-blocker), the warm peripheries. The occult hypoperfusion is revealed only by the venous lactate (over 2 mmol/L) and the base deficit (worse than minus 5 mmol/L) — the markers of the anaerobic metabolism that the compensating elderly patient hides. The serial lactate and the base deficit are the standard on the arrival of the geriatric trauma patient, and the failure to clear the lactate over the first 24 hours is the predictor of the mortality, the multi-organ failure, and the complication — independent of the vital signs. The practitioner who is reassured by the blood pressure and the heart rate, and does not measure the lactate, misses the shock until the decompensation (the sudden, the irreversible collapse of the fixed-output heart).[1][1]

The lactate that does not clear is the shock that is not treated — the serial measurement, not the single value

The single lactate on the arrival is useful, but the clearance is the prognostic marker. The lactate that normalises within 24 hours predicts the survival; the lactate that remains elevated (or rises) at 6 and 24 hours predicts the mortality, the multi-organ failure, and the complication — even when the vital signs remain 'normal'. The elderly trauma patient with the persistent lactate of 3 to 4 mmol/L at 24 hours, the normal blood pressure, and the reassuring heart rate is the patient with the ongoing occult hypoperfusion (the missed bleed, the under-resuscitation, the cardiogenic contribution), and the focused reassessment (the FAST, the CT, the repeat haemoglobin, the ECG, the echocardiogram) is performed until the source is found.[1]

Common pitfalls

The recurring errors are: accepting the normal heart rate as excluding the shock (the beta-blocker); dismissing the ground-level fall as minor; not obtaining the head CT in the elderly with the fall and the anticoagulant; not reversing the anticoagulant early; under-treating the pain of the rib fracture (leading to the splinting, the atelectasis, the pneumonia); missing the occult injury (the delayed or the atypical presentation); and not assessing the frailty or discussing the goals of care. [1]

Differential diagnosis

  • The mechanical fall vs the medical fall — the trip over the rug or the curb is the mechanical fall, but the syncope (the arrhythmia, the orthostatic hypotension, the vasovagal episode), the stroke or the hypoglycaemia is the medical cause of the fall, and the underlying medical cause is sought in every geriatric fall, because the recurrence is prevented only by treating the cause.
  • The traumatic head injury on the anticoagulant vs the spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage — the subdural or the intraparenchymal bleed discovered after the fall may be the traumatic consequence of the impact or the spontaneous haemorrhage that caused the fall, and the CT appearance (the location, the contrecoup pattern) and the history are weighed to distinguish them, as both drive the reversal and the neurosurgical referral.
  • The occult rib fractures vs the pneumothorax or the pulmonary contusion — the pleuritic chest pain and the splinting after the low-energy fall may be the rib fractures alone, but the dyspnoea and the falling saturation raise the pneumothorax or the pulmonary contusion, and the chest X-ray (often supplemented by the CT, as the initial film misses up to half of the rib fractures) resolves the question and the chest tube or the escalation is considered.
  • The cervical-spine injury vs the cervical spondylosis with the canal stenosis — the neck pain and the neurological deficit after the fall may be the fracture or the cord injury, but the chronic cervical stenosis with the central cord syndrome from the hyperextension (the fall, the face-first) produces the same presentation, and the MRI distinguishes the acute cord lesion from the chronic myelopathy.
  • The shock from the occult bleeding vs the shock from the medical cause — the hypotension after the fall may be the hypovolaemia from the occult pelvic or the intra-abdominal bleed, but the cardiogenic shock (the myocardial infarction, the arrhythmia) or the septic shock (the pneumonia, the urinary infection) is equally plausible in the elderly, and the lactate, the focused assessment and the ECG are obtained to separate the traumatic from the medical shock. [1]

The central cord syndrome — the face-first fall in the elderly with the cervical stenosis, the arms weaker than the legs

The central cord syndrome is the most common incomplete spinal cord injury in the elderly, and it is the trap. The elderly patient with the degenerative cervical spondylosis (the canal stenosis) who falls face-first (the hyperextension) suffers the ligamentum flavum infolding and the cord contusion without the fracture or the dislocation — the MRI shows the cord oedema, the plain films and the CT are normal or show only the degenerative change. The classic pattern is the upper-extremity greater than lower-extremity weakness (the cervical cord tracts are somatotopically arranged with the arms central and the legs peripheral), the variable sensory loss, and the bladder dysfunction. The mistake is to attribute the arm weakness to the 'fall on the outstretched hand' or the brachial plexus injury — the neurological exam, the MRI cervical spine, and the spinal-cord-injury referral are the response.[1]

The exam-focused pearls — the Fellowship viva and the high-yield facts

The three pillars of the geriatric trauma — the occult injury, the anticoagulant, and the frailty

The Fellowship candidate frames the geriatric trauma around the three pillars: the occult injury (the delayed and the atypical presentation, the normal vital signs that hide the shock, the CT that is obtained liberally), the anticoagulant (the elevated ICH risk, the early and the specific reversal, the unreliable routine coagulation tests for the DOAC), and the frailty (the Clinical Frailty Scale that predicts the outcome, the goals-of-care discussion that is honest and early). The candidate who addresses all three — not the chronological age and the Injury Severity Score — demonstrates the senior understanding.
[1]

The FAST is less sensitive in the elderly — the CT abdomen is the default, the negative FAST does not exclude the bleed

The focused assessment with sonography for trauma (the FAST) is less sensitive in the elderly than in the young: the retroperitoneal bleeds (the pelvic, the renal), the mesenteric bleeds, and the solid-organ injuries without the haemoperitoneum are missed by the FAST. The elderly patient with the persistent hypotension, the elevated lactate, or the mechanism of the significant force undergoes the CT abdomen-pelvis with the intravenous contrast (after the head CT), even if the FAST is negative. The FAST is the adjunct for the unstable patient who cannot go to the CT, and for the pericardial fluid (the pericardiocentesis and the thoracotomy decision) — it is not the exclusion test in the elderly.[1]

The contrast nephropathy is the fear but the missed bleed is the death — give the contrast, then the fluids

The fear of the contrast-induced nephropathy (the elderly, the chronic kidney disease, the diabetes) sometimes leads to the withholding of the intravenous contrast for the CT — and the missed intra-abdominal bleed is the consequence. The principle in the trauma is that the contrast is given, and the kidney is protected by the hydration (the isotonic crystalloid before and after the scan), the avoidance of the nephrotoxic drugs (the NSAID, the aminoglycoside), and the monitoring of the creatinine. The death from the missed splenic laceration outweighs the reversible creatinine rise. The pre-renal physiology of the trauma (the hypovolaemia) is itself the cause of the AKI, and the contrast is one factor among several — the resuscitation, not the contrast avoidance, is the priority.[1]

The goals of care and the ceiling of treatment — the early, the honest, the shared decision

The goals-of-care discussion in the elderly trauma is not the afterthought of the discharge summary; it is the early conversation that frames the resuscitation. The frail 90-year-old with the advanced dementia, the rib fractures, and the respiratory failure may not benefit from the intubation and the ICU, and the family is involved in the shared decision-making early — the prognosis (the frailty score, the injury severity, the comorbidity), the options (the full resuscitation, the ward-based care, the palliation), and the patient's prior wishes (the advance directive, the lasting power of attorney, the family's knowledge of the patient's values). The conversation is documented; the decision is revisited as the clinical course evolves. The fit 70-year-old and the frail 90-year-old are not the same patient, and the resuscitation is tailored accordingly.[1]

Exam practice

SAQ — The anticoagulated elderly patient with a head injury after a ground-level fall

10 minutes · 10 marks

A 78-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department 2 hours after a ground-level fall at her nursing home, in which she slipped on a wet floor and struck the left side of her head. She is on apixaban 5 mg twice daily for atrial fibrillation, metoprolol 50 mg daily, and perindopril. On arrival she is GCS 14 (confused), BP 142/88, HR 78 in sinus rhythm, SpO2 97 per cent on room air. There is a 5-cm haematoma over the left temporoparietal region. The CT head shows a thin acute subdural haematoma with a 6-mm midline shift. The apixaban was last taken 4 hours ago.

[1]

SAQ — The occult hypoperfusion and the rib fractures in the elderly trauma patient

10 minutes · 10 marks

An 82-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a fall down five stairs. He is alert and conversational, BP 118/72 (his baseline is 165/90), HR 88 in sinus rhythm, RR 24, SpO2 92 per cent on room air. He has left-sided chest-wall tenderness and the chest radiograph shows three left lateral rib fractures (the 6th, 7th and 8th). The lactate is 3.2 mmol per litre, the base deficit is minus 5, and he is in sinus rhythm with no past beta-blocker use. The FAST is negative.

[1]

Red flags

Red flag

The beta-blocker may mask the tachycardia — the heart rate is unreliable in the elderly patient on the beta-blocker.

Red flag

The atrophic brain has more space for the subdural — the head CT is obtained liberally after the fall.

Red flag

The anticoagulated patient with the head injury has the elevated ICH risk — the early reversal and the CT.

Red flag

A ground-level fall in the elderly can produce the significant injury — the mechanism alone does not determine the severity.

Red flag

The frailty, not the chronological age, predicts the outcome — the Clinical Frailty Scale guides the decision.

Red flag

The systolic of 110 mmHg in the elderly hypertensive is the relative hypotension — the shock until the lactate and the base deficit prove otherwise.

Red flag

The rib fracture in the over-65 carries the 10 to 20 per cent mortality — admit, block (the regional analgesia), and the pulmonary toilet, do not under-treat.

Red flag

The DOAC has no reliable rapid monitoring test and the EMS history is unreliable — verify the medication list and the CT head on any anticoagulated head strike.

Red flag

The central cord syndrome (the arms weaker than the legs) follows the face-first fall in the cervical-stenosis elderly — the MRI cervical spine, even when the CT is normal.

Red flag

The persistent lactate (the non-clearance at 24 hours) is the ongoing occult hypoperfusion — the reassessment until the source is found, regardless of the vital signs.

Red flag

The trauma team activation for the age over 65 — the over-triage is the deliberate strategy; the under-triage is the preventable death.

Red flag

The delayed subdural expansion — the serial GCS and the repeat CT at 6 to 24 hours for the anticoagulated elderly, even after the initial negative scan.
[1]

References

  1. [1]Jacobs DG, Plaisier BR, Barie PS, et al. Practice management guidelines for geriatric trauma: the EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group J Trauma, 2003.PMID 12579072
  2. [2]Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition Crit Care, 2023.PMID 36859355
  3. [3]Pollack CV Jr, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J, et al. Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal N Engl J Med, 2015.PMID 26095746
  4. [4]Connolly SJ, Milling TJ Jr, Eikelboom JW, et al. Andexanet Alfa for Acute Major Bleeding Associated with Factor Xa Inhibitors N Engl J Med, 2016.PMID 27573206
  5. [5]Bulger EM, Arneson MA, Mock CN, Jurkovich GJ. Rib fractures in the elderly J Trauma, 2000.PMID 10866248
  6. [6]Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people CMAJ, 2005.PMID 16129869
  7. [7]Nishijima DK, Gaona S, Waechter T, et al. Do EMS Providers Accurately Ascertain Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Use in Older Adults with Head Trauma? Prehosp Emerg Care, 2017.PMID 27636529