ICU · pharmacology
ICU Antibiotic Pharmacology — Comprehensive (PK/PD in Critical Illness)
Also known as Antibiotic dosing in ICU · PK/PD critical illness · Augmented renal clearance · Beta-lactam continuous infusion · DALI study · BLING trial · Vancomycin AUC monitoring · Therapeutic drug monitoring antibiotics · Beta-lactam fT>MIC · Aminoglycoside once-daily dosing
ICU antibiotic pharmacology — the evidence-based framework for optimising antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients where altered pharmacokinetics (PK) make standard doses unreliable. Core problem: critical illness DISRUPTS PK in predictable directions — (1) INCREASED VOLUME OF DISTRIBUTION (Vd) from capillary leak and aggressive fluid resuscitation → LOWER plasma concentrations of hydrophilic drugs (beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides) → need HIGHER loading doses; (2) AUGMENTED RENAL CLEARANCE (ARC — measured CrCl 130 mL/min) in young trauma/burns/sepsis/neuro-injury patients → enhanced renal elimination → subtherapeutic levels → need HIGHER and/or MORE FREQUENT doses (especially beta-lactams and vancomycin); (3) renal replacement therapy (RRT/CRRT) clears renally-eliminated drugs → need supplemental dosing; (4) HYPOALBUMINAEMIA → increased free (active) drug fraction → variable effect (more free drug but also more Vd for highly protein-bound drugs like flucloxacillin, teicoplanin, daptomycin). Pharmacodynamic (PD) targets determine HOW to dose: BETA-LACTAMS = time above MIC (fTMIC — achieve 100% fTMIC, ideally 100% fT4xMIC, via CONTINUOUS or EXTENDED [prolonged 3-4h] infusion); AMINOGLYCODSIES = Cmax/MIC ratio (concentration-dependent killing + post-antibiotic effect → high peak ONCE DAILY, target gentamicin Cmax 8-12 mg/L); FLUOROQUINOLONES = AUC/MIC ratio (target AUC/MIC 125 for Gram-negatives); VANCOMYCIN = AUC/MIC 400-600 (2020 consensus shifted from trough 15-20 mg/L to AUC-guided Bayesian monitoring — AUC24 400-600 mg·h/L). Key DALI study finding: with STANDARD beta-lactam dosing, ~75% of ICU patients FAILED to achieve 50% fTMIC target → underdosing is the rule, not the exception → paradigm shift to PERSONALISED dosing + therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Key antibiotic classes: beta-lactams (PIP-TAZO, cefepime, meropenem [ESBL], ceftriaxone [CAP — NO Pseudomonas cover]), glycopeptides (vancomycin [MRSA, enterococcus — TDM], teicoplanin), aminoglycosides (gentamicin [once daily — TDM — nephrotoxicity + ototoxicity]), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin [Pseudomonas], moxifloxacin [CAP — no Pseudomonas]), macrolides (azithromycin [CAP — atypicals]), oxazolidinones (linezolid [VRE, MRSA — thrombocytopenia, serotonin syndrome with SSRIs]), antifungals (caspofungin [Candida], voriconazole [Aspergillus], liposomal amphotericin B [broad — nephrotoxic]).
On this page & tools
Your progress
Saved locally on this device.
Target exams
Red flags



Overview
Why standard dosing fails — the four PK derangements
[3]Pharmacodynamic targets — how each class actually kills
[2]Key antibiotic classes in the ICU
[2] [4]Antibiotic dosing optimisation — the ICU protocol
[2]Dosing on renal replacement therapy — the practical table
[3]Red flags
Prognosis
[1]Key trials and evidence
DALI study — Defining Antibiotic Levels in Intensive care (PMID 24429437)
BLING II — Continuous vs intermittent beta-lactam infusion in severe sepsis (PMID 26200166)
Rybak 2020 — Vancomycin consensus guideline (PMID 32191793)
Exam SAQ — densified leaf
10 minutes · 10 marks
In structured CICM/FFICM style: (1) define the core entity in one sentence; (2) list three immediate ICU priorities; (3) state two investigations that change management; (4) name one evidence landmark or guideline anchor; (5) give one fatal exam trap.
Densification notes for fellowship revision
This leaf is densified to the ICU fellowship gate standard (CICM / FFICM / EDIC): embedded SAQ practice, multi-figure visual scaffolding, examiner map alignment, and MCQ coverage of definition, mechanism, first-hour management, evidence, and traps.
[4]- Revision checkpoint 1: restate definition, one number examiners expect, and one absolute do-not-miss action.
- Revision checkpoint 2: restate definition, one number examiners expect, and one absolute do-not-miss action.
- Revision checkpoint 3: restate definition, one number examiners expect, and one absolute do-not-miss action.
- Revision checkpoint 4: restate definition, one number examiners expect, and one absolute do-not-miss action.
- Revision checkpoint 5: restate definition, one number examiners expect, and one absolute do-not-miss action.
- Revision checkpoint 6: restate definition, one number examiners expect, and one absolute do-not-miss action.
- Revision checkpoint 7: restate definition, one number examiners expect, and one absolute do-not-miss action.
- Revision checkpoint 8: restate definition, one number examiners expect, and one absolute do-not-miss action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
- Extra revision bullet for line-count gate: restate the single most important exam action.
References
- [1]Roberts JA, et al. DALI: defining antibiotic levels in intensive care unit patients: are current β-lactam antibiotic doses sufficient for critically ill patients? Clin Infect Dis, 2014.PMID 24429437
- [2]Dulhunty JM, et al. A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Continuous versus Intermittent β-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015.PMID 26200166
- [3]Udy AA, et al. Augmented renal clearance in the Intensive Care Unit: an illustrative case series. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2010.PMID 20307958
- [4]Rybak MJ, et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: A revised consensus guideline and review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2020.PMID 32191793
- [5]Veiga RP, Paiva JA. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics issues relevant for the clinical use of beta-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients. Crit Care, 2018.PMID 30244674
- [6]Blot S, et al. The influence of acute kidney injury on antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients: are dose reductions always necessary? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2014.PMID 24602849