Acute kidney injury: prevention, biomarkers, and RRT timing
Also known as AKI prevention · AKI biomarkers · NGAL · Cystatin C · RRT timing · ELAIN trial · AKIKI trial · STARRT-AKI trial · KDIGO definition · AEIOU indications · NephroCheck · TIMP-2 IGFBP7
AKI prevention and management in ICU. PREVENTION: avoid nephrotoxins (NSAIDs, aminoglycosides, contrast), maintain perfusion (adequate BP, goal-directed fluids), monitor drugs. BIOMARKERS: NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) and cystatin C rise EARLIER than creatinine (within hours vs 24-48h) — may allow EARLIER detection and intervention. KDIGO DEFINITION: creatinine rise (≥26.5 μmol/L in 48h or ≥1.5× baseline) or urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥6h. RRT TIMING: ELAIN trial (early RRT within 8h of AKI stage 2) vs AKIKI trial (RRT only for urgent indications) vs STARRT-AKI (accelerated strategy) — current consensus favours waiting for URGENT indications (AEIOU: Acidosis, Electrolytes, Ingestion/toxin, Overload, Uraemia) rather than routine early RRT. AKIKI (2016) and STARRT-AKI (2020): no benefit of early RRT.
high13 referencesUpdated 3 July 2026
On this page & tools
Your progress
Saved locally on this device.
Target exams
CICMFFICMEDIC
Red flags
AKIKI and STARRT-AKI: EARLY RRT does NOT improve outcomes (start for URGENT indications, not routine early)Avoid nephrotoxins (NSAIDs, aminoglycosides, ACEi in shock) — most preventable AKI causeNGAL/cystatin C rise earlier than creatinine — may allow early detectionAEIOU mnemonic for urgent RRT: Acidosis, Electrolytes, Ingestion (toxin), Overload (fluid), UraemiaEven KDIGO stage 1 AKI doubles mortality — prevention is the single best strategyAKIKI 50% of 'delayed' arm never needed RRT — early initiation exposes patients unnecessarily
FigureAKI prevention is the only intervention with proven mortality benefit — avoid nephrotoxins, maintain perfusion, use balanced crystalloids. Damage biomarkers (NGAL, TIMP-2·IGFBP7) rise hours before creatinine. RRT timing: AKIKI and STARRT-AKI showed NO benefit (and possible harm) from early RRT — start only for URGENT indications, captured by AEIOU (Acidosis, Electrolytes, Ingestion, Overload, Uraemia).[1]
KDIGO definition and staging
KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) defines AKI by either a functional criterion (creatinine) or a flow criterion (urine output). Either is sufficient — they do NOT have to coexist. The diagnosis is made when any ONE of the following holds: [1]
Creatinine rise of ≥26.5 μmol/L (≥0.3 mg/dL) within 48 h, OR
Creatinine rise to ≥1.5× the baseline value (known or presumed to have occurred within the prior 7 days), OR
Urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥6 consecutive hours. [1]
Once AKI is diagnosed it is staged 1→3 by severity. Stage 3 includes anyone who has been started on RRT, regardless of preceding creatinine or urine output.[5]
KDIGO AKI staging — creatinine and urine output criteria
| 1 | ≥1.5–1.9× baseline OR ≥26.5 μmol/L (0.3 mg/dL) rise in 48 h | <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6–12 h |
| 2 | ≥2.0–2.9× baseline | <0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥12 h |
| 3 | ≥3× baseline OR rise to ≥353.6 μmol/L (4.0 mg/dL) OR initiated on RRT OR (in <18 yr) eGFR drop to <35 mL/min/1.73 m² | <0.3 mL/kg/h for ≥24 h OR anuria for ≥12 h |
KDIGO-aligned AKI work-up on the ICU round (ABCDE)
A — Assess risk and recognise. Pull the KDIGO risk profile: sepsis, CKD (eGFR <60), diabetes, age >75, heart failure, cirrhosis, hypovolaemia, recent contrast/NSAID/aminoglycoside/vancomycin exposure. If at risk → daily creatinine + hourly urine output chart.
B — Baseline. Determine the baseline creatinine (the most recent normal value in the prior 3 months). If unavailable, back-calculate from a MDRD-derived estimate assuming an eGFR of 75 mL/min/1.73 m². Without a baseline you cannot stage AKI.
C — Cause. Pre-/intrinsic/post-renal screen: history (drugs, hypotension, rash, pigment), exam (volume status, bladder, prostate), urinalysis (dipstick + microscopy for casts), bedside POCUS (hydronephrosis, B-lines, IVC, bladder). Send FENa and, if available, urine microscopy.
D — Drugs and diagnostics. Renally dose-adjust every renally-cleared drug; stop and review every nephrotoxin (the 'nephrotoxin time-out'). Check K⁺, Mg²⁺, phosphate, bicarbonate/venous lactate, FBC, CK (if pigmenturia), troponin, and — if diagnosis uncertain — ANA, ANCA, complements, myoglobin, free light chains.
E — Escalate and exit. Decide whether RRT is needed NOW (apply AEIOU) or whether the patient can be managed conservatively (fluids if responsive, vasopressors, K⁺ binders, bicarbonate if pH 7.1–7.2 with shock). Document a recovery plan and a re-check interval.
FigurePathophysiology — creatinine lags; damage biomarkers and the prevention bundle target the reversible drivers of ICU-AKI.
Prevention is the only intervention with proven mortality benefit in AKI. Once AKI is established, no pharmacological agent (including dopamine, fenoldopam, nesiritide, ANP, furosemide) has been shown to alter its course. The KDIGO bundle is therefore a small set of high-yield, low-cost manoeuvres.[5][6]
KDIGO AKI prevention bundle — what to do and what NOT to do
| Haemodynamics | Achieve and maintain adequate MAP (≥65 mmHg, individualise in chronic HTN); use vasopressors after volume resuscitation; monitor lactate clearance | Permissive hypotension beyond the first 6 h of shock; flooding with crystalloid once patient no longer fluid-responsive |
| Fluids | Use balanced crystalloids in shock; reassess responsiveness every 4–6 h; de-resuscitate once shock resolves | Sustained 0.9% saline (hyperchloraemic acidosis, AKI risk — SMART trial); hydroxyethyl starch (RENAL and CHEST trials — harm); albumin except in cirrhosis with bacterial peritonitis |
| Drugs | Once-daily extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing with TDM; dose-adjust vancomycin to AUC/MIC; lipid formulations of amphotericin B | Concurrent ≥2 nephrotoxins; NSAIDs in shock/CKD/decompensated HF; ACEi/ARB initiation during shock; empiric high-dose loop diuretics to 'force urine' |
| Contrast | Pre- and post-procedure isotonic saline; use lowest possible contrast volume; hold metformin/diuretics peri-procedure | Routine N-acetylcysteine (PRESERVE trial — no benefit); prophylactic RRT after contrast; intra-arterial gadolinium |
| Glycaemic control | Insulin to keep glucose 6–10 mmol/L; avoid hypoglycaemia | Severe hyperglycaemia (osmotic diuresis, volume depletion) |
| Source control | Drainage / debridement / removal of infected hardware within 6–12 h of septic shock recognition | Delayed source control — each hour of delay in septic shock adds ~7.6% to mortality |
A central KDIGO concept is the distinction between functional markers (creatinine, cystatin C, urine output — they fall only AFTER the GFR has dropped) and damage markers (NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, L-FABP, and the cell-cycle arrest pair TIMP-2·IGFBP7 — they rise within hours of tubular injury, BEFORE GFR falls). Damage markers therefore create a 'pre-AKI' window — patients at risk of, but not yet meeting criteria for, AKI — during which prevention is most effective.[4]
AKI biomarkers — what they tell you and when
[{"header":"Biomarker"},{"header":"Type"},{"header":"Source"},{"header":"What it detects"},{"header":"Time-to-rise"}]
| Creatinine | Functional (GFR) | Serum | Loss of filtration (any cause) | 24–48 h after injury |
| Cystatin C | Functional (GFR) | Serum | Loss of filtration — freely filtered, not muscle-mass dependent | 12–24 h (earlier than creatinine) |
| Urea / BUN | Functional + volume | Serum | Filtration loss AND volume depletion (BUN:Cr >20 suggests pre-renal) | Variable |
| NGAL (lipocalin-2) | Damage (tubular) | Urine or plasma | Tubular epithelial stress — ischaemia, sepsis, nephrotoxin | 2–6 h |
| KIM-1 | Damage (proximal tubule) | Urine | Proximal tubule injury, especially ischaemic / toxic | 12–24 h |
| IL-18 | Damage (inflammatory) | Urine | Inflammatory / ischaemic ATN (distinguishes from pre-renal) | 4–12 h |
| L-FABP | Damage (oxidative) | Urine | Oxidative tubular stress | 4–12 h |
| TIMP-2·IGFBP7 (NephroCheck) | Damage (cell-cycle arrest) | Urine | Cell-cycle arrest — risk of AKI stage 2–3 within 12 h | 4–12 h |
The mnemonic AEIOU captures the only reasons to start RRT on a patient who does not have a relative indication already met. They are absolute, not negotiable — each represents a situation where conservative therapy has failed or cannot work.[6]
FigureRRT timing — start for AEIOU urgencies; early RRT without absolute indication did not improve survival in large RCTs.
Four multicentre randomised trials now define the evidence base for RRT initiation timing in ICU-AKI. They are unified by one conclusion: routine, accelerated initiation does not improve survival, and in STARRT-AKI may harm.[1][2][3][7]
| AKIKI (Gaudry 2016) | 620 (KDIGO stage 2) | RRT within 6 h of stage 2 (mostly within 18 h) | RRT only on urgent indication or anuria for >72 h; 49% never started RRT | 60-day mortality 48% vs 50% — no difference |
| ELAIN (Zarbock 2016) | 231 (KDIGO stage 2 + NGAL >150 or stage 3) | RRT within 8 h of stage 2 | RRT within 12 h of stage 3; 91% started RRT | 90-day mortality 39% vs 55% — early better (absolute risk reduction 16%) |
| IDEAL-ICU (Barbar 2018) | 488 (septic shock, RIFLE 'Failure') | RRT within 12 h of stage 3 (Failure) | RRT after 48 h delay if no recovery | 90-day mortality 58% vs 54% — no difference; stopped early for futility |
| STARRT-AKI (Bagshaw 2020) | 3,019 (KDIGO stage 2/3 + shock or organ failure) | Accelerated RRT within 12 h | Standard strategy — wait for urgent indication or AKI persists >72 h; 62% started RRT | 90-day mortality 43.9% vs 43.7% — no difference; MORE adverse events (RRT dependence 10.0% vs 6.0%) |
Population: 620 French ICU patients with KDIGO stage 2 AKI (≥2× baseline creatinine OR <0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥12 h) and at least one organ failure.
Design: Multicentre, open-label, parallel-group RCT.
Intervention: Early RRT started immediately (median 2 h after randomisation, mostly within 6 h) vs delayed strategy in which RRT was started ONLY if one of the urgent indications developed or if anuria persisted >72 h.
Result: 60-day mortality 48% (early) vs 50% (delayed) — no difference (P=0.79). Critically, 49% of the delayed group NEVER needed RRT — meaning that routine early initiation exposes half of patients to an invasive therapy they did not need. Catheter-related infections and bleeding were more common in the early arm.
Take-home: In severe ICU-AKI without an urgent indication, waiting is safe. The delayed strategy is the default.
STARRT-AKI — Bagshaw 2020 (NEJM) — accelerated vs standard RRT
Population: 3,019 critically ill patients across 168 ICUs in 15 countries, with KDIGO stage 2/3 AKI AND at least one non-renal organ failure or shock.
Design: International, multicentre, parallel-group RCT.
Intervention: Accelerated strategy — RRT within 12 h of stage 2/3 diagnosis. Standard strategy — wait for urgent indication OR AKI persisting beyond 72 h.
Result: 90-day mortality 43.9% (accelerated) vs 43.7% (standard) — no difference. Adverse events (a composite of RRT dependence at 90 days, major bleeding, catheter-related infection) were significantly MORE common with accelerated RRT — 34.6% vs 30.5%. RRT dependence at 90 days occurred in 10.0% of the accelerated group vs 6.0% of the standard group.
Take-home: The largest, most generalisable RRT-timing trial to date shows that accelerating initiation confers no benefit and exposes patients to harm. The standard (delayed) strategy should be the default in the absence of an urgent indication.
ELAIN — Zarbock 2016 (JAMA) — early vs delayed RRT in KDIGO stage 2
Population: 231 German ICU patients with KDIGO stage 2 AKI plus a damage biomarker (urinary NGAL >150 ng/mL) or progression to KDIGO stage 3.
Design: Single-centre, randomised, open-label.
Intervention: Early RRT within 8 h of stage 2 vs delayed RRT within 12 h of progression to stage 3.
Result: 90-day mortality 39% (early) vs 55% (delayed) — absolute risk reduction 16%, number-needed-to-treat 6.2. Reduced duration of RRT and shorter hospital length of stay in the early group.
Caution: This is the lone positive trial. It was small, single-centre, used NGAL selection (enriching for patients with active tubular injury), and over 90% of the delayed arm eventually received RRT. AKIKI and STARRT-AKI — larger and multicentre — failed to reproduce the signal. ELAIN remains an interesting outlier but has not changed international consensus.
Take-home: ELAIN is the trial that makes the 'early RRT in stage 2' question live. For exam purposes, know it AND know that AKIKI/STARRT-AKI superseded it.
IDEAL-ICU — Barbar 2018 (NEJM) — early vs delayed RRT in septic shock AKI
Population: 488 French ICU patients with septic shock and RIFLE 'Failure'-class AKI (urine output <0.3 mL/kg/h for ≥6 h OR creatinine ≥3× baseline).
Design: Multicentre, randomised, open-label; stopped early for futility after second interim analysis.
Intervention: Early RRT within 12 h of 'Failure' class vs delayed RRT after a 48-h waiting period (if no renal recovery).
Result: 90-day mortality 58% (early) vs 54% (delayed) — no difference. The trial was underpowered due to early stopping; 38% of the delayed group never received RRT.
Take-home: Even in the high-risk subgroup of septic shock with severe AKI, an early strategy does not improve survival. Strengthens the AKIKI/STARRT-AKI consensus.
Applying RRT timing at the bedside — a decision algorithm
Confirm the patient meets KDIGO stage 2 or 3 criteria. Staging requires a baseline creatinine — find one (or back-calculate). Document stage on the chart.
Run through AEIOU. Acidosis (pH <7.1–7.15)? Electrolytes (K⁺ >6.5 with ECG change)? Ingestion (lithium, metformin, salicylate, methanol, ethylene glycol)? Overload (pulmonary oedema unresponsive to diuretics)? Uraemia (pericarditis, encephalopathy, bleeding)? If ANY is present → start RRT now.
If no urgent indication, reassess every 12–24 h. Re-check creatinine, urine output, K⁺, bicarbonate, fluid balance, and overall trajectory. The question is not 'does the patient have AKI?' but 'is the patient improving, static, or worsening?'.
Declare anuria plateau. If a patient has had anuria for >72 h despite reversible causes being addressed, RRT should be initiated (the AKIKI delayed criterion) — the kidney has shown it will not recover on its own in the immediate term.
Pick the modality to match the patient. Continuous (CVVHDF) for the haemodynamically unstable, fluid-overloaded, or brain-injured. Intermittent HD for stable, mobile patients needing solute clearance. Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) as a hybrid. Peritoneal for the paediatric or vascular-access-poor adult.
Set the dose and reassess. KDIGO dose target: 20–25 mL/kg/h of effluent for CRRT (delivered is usually 80% of prescribed due to interruptions). Monitor daily — effluent dose, filter life, anticoagulation (citrate preferred unless citrate toxicity/accumulation in severe liver failure).
Plan the wean. Watch for spontaneous rise in urine output (especially during CRRT 'stop-test' — pause for 4–6 h to assess native urine output). Stop when creatinine stable and urine output adequate without RRT for 24–48 h.
RRT timing trials — AKIKI vs ELAIN vs STARRT-AKI — synthesis
AKIKI (Gaudry 2016, NEJM): 620 patients with KDIGO stage 2/3 AKI. Early RRT (within 6h) vs delayed (urgent indication only). Result: NO mortality difference (48% vs 50%). More RRT use in early group; 49% of delayed arm never received RRT. Conclusion: Don't start early RRT routinely.
ELAIN (Zarbock 2016, JAMA): 231 patients with KDIGO stage 2 + NGAL >150 or stage 3. Early RRT (within 8h) vs delayed (within 12h of stage 3). Result: REDUCED 90-day mortality (39% vs 55%). BUT: small, single-centre, NGAL-selected, >90% of delayed arm received RRT. Not confirmed by larger trials.
IDEAL-ICU (Barbar 2018, NEJM): 488 patients with septic shock and RIFLE-Failure-class AKI. Early RRT within 12h vs delayed (after 48h if no recovery). Result: NO mortality difference (58% vs 54%); 38% of delayed arm never received RRT.
STARRT-AKI (Bagshaw 2020, NEJM): 3,019 patients with KDIGO stage 2/3 + organ failure. Accelerated RRT (within 12h) vs standard (urgent indication or AKI >72h). Result: NO benefit (43.9% vs 43.7%). MORE adverse events with accelerated (RRT dependence 10.0% vs 6.0%). Conclusion: EARLY RRT HARMFUL (don't start routinely). [1]
OVERALL CONSENSUS: Start RRT for URGENT indications (AEIOU). Do NOT start 'early' preventatively. The single exception that some units still consider is the high-risk patient with progressive KDIGO stage 2 plus a positive damage biomarker and rising lactate — but this remains a judgement call, not standard of care.
Discharge planning for the AKI survivor — the post-AKI pathway
Document the peak stage. Record the worst KDIGO stage reached and the duration of AKI. This stratifies long-term risk.
Confirm recovery. Ensure SCr has plateaued (two consecutive stable values ≥48 h apart) before discharge. If SCr is still rising, do not discharge.
Drug reconciliation. Re-dose every drug to the recovery (not the AKI) GFR. Restart ACEi/ARB only if SCr is within 25% of baseline. Hold NSAIDs indefinitely if possible.
Arrange follow-up. SCr + BP at 3 months. If eGFR <60 or new proteinuria, refer to nephrology. Re-counsel on the 'sick day rule' — hold ACEi/ARB, NSAIDs, diuretics (SADMANS drugs) during any acute illness.
Address the underlying cause. Sepsis source, obstructive uropathy, cardiac decompensation, nephrotoxin exposure — all need a management plan to prevent recurrence. Recurrent AKI dramatically accelerates the trajectory to CKD.
Lifestyle. Smoking cessation, BP <130/80, glucose control, weight reduction. AKI is now recognised as a cardiovascular risk equivalent.
SAQ — Timing of RRT in severe AKI without an urgent indication (AKIKI vs STARRT-AKI)
10 minutes · 10 marks
A 68-year-old man is admitted to ICU with septic shock from a perforated viscus. He is on noradrenaline 0.35 mcg/kg/min (MAP 66), lactate 3.8 mmol/L, and has had surgical source control. Day 3: creatinine has risen from 95 to 340 micromol/L and urine output is 120 mL over the last 12 hours (KDIGO stage 3). K+ 5.6 mmol/L (no ECG change), pH 7.28, bicarbonate 17, cumulative fluid balance +6.5 L. He does NOT have an urgent indication for RRT. The registrar asks whether to start RRT now to stay ahead of the kidney.
SAQ — CRRT versus intermittent haemodialysis: modality choice and dosing
10 minutes · 10 marks
A 72-year-old woman (weight 70 kg) is in ICU on day 4 of severe septic shock from pyelonephritis. She requires noradrenaline 0.4 mcg/kg/min (MAP 64) and has oligo-anuric KDIGO stage 3 AKI: creatinine 410 micromol/L, K+ 6.9 mmol/L with peaked T-waves on ECG, pH 7.12, bicarbonate 14, and a cumulative fluid balance of +8 L with pulmonary oedema on chest X-ray. RRT is to be commenced. The team debates continuous (CVVHDF) versus intermittent haemodialysis, and the prescribed dose.
[1]Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, et al. Initiation Strategies for Renal-Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit N Engl J Med, 2016.PMID 27181456
[2]STARRT-AKI Investigators; Bagshaw SM, Wald R, Adhikari NKJ, et al. Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury N Engl J Med, 2020.PMID 32668114
[3]Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, et al. Effect of Early vs Delayed Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: The ELAIN Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2016.PMID 27209269
[5]Kellum JA, Lameire N; KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1) Crit Care, 2013.PMID 23394211
[6]Lameire N, Kellum JA; KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and renal support for acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 2) Crit Care, 2013.PMID 23394215
[7]Barbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A, et al. Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 30304656
[8]Weisbord SD, Gallagher M, Jneid H, et al. Outcomes after Angiography with Sodium Bicarbonate and Acetylcysteine N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29130810
[9]Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al.; SMART Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 29768150
[10]Kashani K, Al-Khafaji A, Ardiles T, et al. Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury Crit Care, 2013.PMID 23388612
[11]Susantitaphong P, Cruz DN, Cerda J, et al.; Acute Kidney Injury Advisory Group of the American Society of Nephrology. World incidence of AKI: a meta-analysis Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2013.PMID 23744003
[12]Bouchard J, Soroko SB, Chertow GM, et al.; Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease (PICARD) Study Group. Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury Kidney Int, 2009.PMID 19436332
[13]Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study Intensive Care Med, 2015.PMID 26162677