ICU · Respiratory / gas exchange
Mechanisms of Hypoxaemia — V/Q Mismatch, Shunt, Diffusion, Hypoventilation
Also known as Hypoxaemia · Mechanisms of hypoxaemia · V/Q mismatch · Shunt · Diffusion impairment · Hypoventilation · Type 1 respiratory failure · Type 2 respiratory failure · A-a gradient · Alveolar gas equation · Oxygen cascade
There are five mechanisms of hypoxaemia: low inspired oxygen, hypoventilation (type 2 failure, with a NORMAL alveolar-arterial gradient), ventilation-perfusion mismatch (the commonest cause, correctable by 100 per cent oxygen), shunt (does NOT correct with 100 per cent oxygen), and diffusion impairment (worsens with exercise). The alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient distinguishes hypoventilation (normal gradient) from a lung problem (high gradient), and the response to 100 per cent oxygen distinguishes V/Q mismatch (corrects) from true shunt (does not).
On this page & tools
Your progress
Saved locally on this device.
Target exams
Overview & definition
Hypoxaemia is a low arterial oxygen tension (PaO2); hypoxia is low oxygen delivery to the tissues. There are five mechanisms of hypoxaemia: low inspired oxygen, hypoventilation, ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch, shunt, and diffusion impairment. Two bedside tools — the alveolar-arterial (A-a) oxygen gradient and the response to 100 per cent oxygen — distinguish them and direct treatment.[1][1]

The oxygen cascade and the alveolar gas equation
Oxygen partial pressure falls in steps from the dry inspired gas to the mitochondrion:[1][1]
- Dry inspired PO2 = FiO2 x 713 = 0.21 x 713 = about 150 mmHg (sea level, room air).
- Humidified tracheal PO2 = 150 - 47 (water vapour) = about 150 mmHg (water vapour is subtracted in the equation).
- Alveolar PO2 (PAO2) — given by the alveolar gas equation: PAO2 = FiO2(Patm - PH2O) - PaCO2/R, where R is the respiratory quotient (about 0.8). On room air: PAO2 = 150 - 40/0.8 = 150 - 50 = 100 mmHg.[1]
- Arterial PO2 (PaO2) = about 95 mmHg (the small A-a difference).
The A-a gradient (PAO2 - PaO2) is normally under about 15 mmHg in a young adult, rising with age (roughly age divided by 4, plus 4). A normal A-a gradient means gas exchange is intact and the hypoxaemia is from low inspired oxygen or hypoventilation; a high A-a gradient means the lung itself is the problem.[1][1]
The five mechanisms


1. Low inspired oxygen
Altitude, a low-delivered FiO2, or a hypoxic gas mixture. The A-a gradient is normal; the problem is what is being breathed. Corrected by increasing the inspired oxygen.[1]
2. Hypoventilation (type 2 respiratory failure)
Alveolar ventilation is inadequate, so CO2 accumulates and PAO2 falls (the alveolar gas equation: as PaCO2 rises, PAO2 falls).[1][1]
- The A-a gradient is normal — gas exchange is intact, the problem is ventilation.
- For every 1 mmHg the PaCO2 rises, the PaO2 falls by about 1.25 mmHg.
- Causes: reduced central drive (opioids, brainstem injury, obesity-hypoventilation), neuromuscular weakness (Guillain-Barre, myasthenia, myopathy), chest-wall disease (kyphoscoliosis, obesity), and airway obstruction (COPD).
- Treatment: ventilation (non-invasive or invasive) and reversal of the cause — oxygen alone improves PaO2 temporarily but does not stop the CO2 from rising.[1]
3. Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatch — the commonest cause
Mismatch between ventilation and perfusion across the lung. Low-V/Q units (perfused but under-ventilated, as in consolidation, oedema, atelectasis, bronchospasm) act as a partial shunt; high-V/Q units (ventilated but under-perfused, as in embolism or emphysema) act as dead space. The net effect in disease is dominated by the low-V/Q units that drag down the PaO2.[1][1]
- It is the commonest mechanism of hypoxaemia in lung disease (pneumonia, asthma, COPD, pulmonary oedema, pulmonary embolism).
- The A-a gradient is high.
- It is largely correctable by 100 per cent oxygen — even poorly ventilated units can be recruited to oxygenate their blood when the inspired oxygen is high.[1]
4. Shunt — does NOT correct with 100 per cent oxygen
Blood bypasses ventilated alveoli entirely, so it never equilibrates with alveolar gas. Because the shunted blood contributes deoxygenated blood to the arterial circulation, raising the inspired oxygen barely helps — the defining feature of true shunt.[1][1]
- Causes: an anatomical right-to-left shunt (patent foramen ovale, pulmonary arteriovenous malformation, hepatopulmonary syndrome) and a physiological shunt from completely unventilated but perfused lung (severe ARDS, dense consolidation, complete atelectasis).
- The A-a gradient is high.
- Treatment: PEEP and alveolar recruitment (to re-open collapsed alveoli and convert shunt back to low-V/Q units), and treatment of the anatomical shunt. Oxygen alone is insufficient.[1]
5. Diffusion impairment
A thickened alveolar-capillary membrane slows oxygen transfer so that venous blood does not fully equilibrate with alveolar gas before leaving the capillary.[1]
- Causes: interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, and the early exudative phase of pulmonary oedema.
- It worsens with exercise — the capillary transit time shortens as cardiac output rises, so there is less time for equilibration, and the PaO2 falls.
- The A-a gradient is high, and it is correctable by 100 per cent oxygen (a higher alveolar PO2 drives faster diffusion).[1]
Two bedside discriminators
The mechanisms collapse into a practical approach:[1][1]
| Discriminator | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| A-a gradient | Normal gradient = hypoventilation or low inspired oxygen; high gradient = V/Q mismatch, shunt, or diffusion |
| Response to 100 per cent O2 | PaO2 rises markedly = V/Q mismatch or diffusion; PaO2 rises little = true shunt |
So: a hypoxaemic patient with a normal A-a gradient and a high CO2 has hypoventilation (ventilate them); a hypoxaemic patient with a high A-a gradient that corrects with oxygen has V/Q mismatch (give oxygen and treat the cause); a patient who does not correct with oxygen has shunt (PEEP, recruitment, and treat the shunt).[1]
Clinical application
- The commonest cause of hypoxaemia in the ICU is V/Q mismatch, which responds to oxygen.
- The patient who is hypoxaemic despite a high FiO2 has shunt — the ARDS picture — and needs PEEP and recruitment, not more oxygen.
- The patient with a high CO2 and a normal A-a gradient has hypoventilation and needs ventilatory support, not just oxygen.
- Hypercapnia is not one of the five mechanisms of hypoxaemia — it is type 2 respiratory failure, a separate entity, although it causes hypoxaemia through the alveolar gas equation (a high PaCO2 lowers the PAO2).[1][1]
A-a gradient — calculation and worked examples
The alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-a gradient, PAO2 − PaO2) is the single most useful calculation for working out the cause of hypoxaemia. It compares the PAO2 the lung should generate (from the alveolar gas equation) with the PaO2 it actually achieves (from the ABG).[1][1]
Interpreting the A-a gradient — the key fork in the road
| A-a gradient | Meaning | Mechanism | Bedside clue | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NORMAL (less than 15 young adult; less than 25 elderly; rises about 3 mmHg per decade; bedside formula age/4 + 4) | Gas exchange is intact — the alveoli are fine | Hypoventilation or low inspired PO2 | PaCO2 is elevated (hypoventilation) or the patient is at altitude | Ventilate (hypoventilation); raise FiO2 / descend (altitude) |
| ELEVATED (above 15-25 for age) | The lung (or heart) itself is the problem | V/Q mismatch, shunt, or diffusion impairment | PaCO2 is normal or low (hyperventilation offsetting the hypoxaemia) | Oxygen + treat the cause; PEEP/recruitment if shunt |
The normal A-a gradient rises with age because of progressive closure of dependent airways and a small increase in baseline venous admixture — about 3 mmHg per decade, captured by the bedside formula age/4 + 4 (so a 20-year-old has a gradient of about 9; an 80-year-old about 24). A gradient of 25 mmHg is reassuring in an 80-year-old but pathological in a 20-year-old — always interpret the number for age.[1]
Worked example 1 — hypoventilation (opioid toxicity). A post-operative patient on an opioid PCA: PaO2 55, PaCO2 70, on room air. PAO2 = 0.21 × (760 − 47) − 70/0.8 = 150 − 87.5 = 62.5 mmHg. A-a gradient = 62.5 − 55 = 7.5 mmHg (normal). The low PaO2 is entirely explained by the high CO2 — this is hypoventilation. Treatment is ventilation (NIV or reversal with naloxone), not chasing a lung problem.[1][1]
Worked example 2 — V/Q mismatch (pneumonia). PaO2 55, PaCO2 32, on room air. PAO2 = 0.21 × 713 − 32/0.8 = 150 − 40 = 110 mmHg. A-a gradient = 110 − 55 = 55 mmHg (markedly elevated). The lung is the problem — V/Q mismatch from consolidation. Oxygen will help substantially; treat the pneumonia.[1]
Worked example 3 — severe shunt (ARDS). A ventilated patient on FiO2 0.8: PaO2 60, PaCO2 40. PAO2 = 0.8 × 713 − 40/0.8 = 570 − 50 = 520 mmHg. A-a gradient = 520 − 60 = 460 mmHg (massive). The gradient is enormous and the patient is refractory to a high FiO2 — this is shunt, needing PEEP, recruitment, proning, and possibly VV-ECMO. Pushing FiO2 higher will not fix it.[2][3]
Worked example 4 — altitude (low inspired PO2). A climber at 2500 m (Patm about 560 mmHg): PaO2 50, PaCO2 34, breathing room air. PAO2 = 0.21 × (560 − 47) − 34/0.8 = 0.21 × 513 − 42.5 = 108 − 42.5 = 65 mmHg. A-a gradient = 65 − 50 = 15 mmHg (normal). The whole cascade is shifted down by the low atmospheric pressure, but the lung transfers gas normally — this is low inspired PO2. Corrected by oxygen (or descent).[1]
The 100 per cent oxygen test — V/Q mismatch versus shunt
The definitive bedside discriminator between V/Q mismatch and true shunt is the response to 100 per cent oxygen. Give FiO2 1.0 for about 15 minutes (long enough to wash out nitrogen from even poorly ventilated units), then re-measure the PaO2.[1][1]
The 100 per cent oxygen test — distinguishing V/Q mismatch from shunt
| After 15 minutes on FiO2 1.0 | Interpretation | Why |
|---|---|---|
| PaO2 rises above about 350 mmHg | V/Q mismatch — correctable | Even poorly ventilated units are still open to the alveolus; 100 per cent O2 raises their PAO2 and oxygenates their blood |
| PaO2 stays below about 350 mmHg | Significant SHUNT — not correctable by FiO2 | The shunted blood never contacts alveolar gas, so FiO2 cannot reach it; the ceiling is set by how much blood is being shunted |
The ~350 mmHg threshold is pragmatic: on pure oxygen, a lung with only V/Q mismatch (no shunt) should achieve a PaO2 well above 350 mmHg, because every perfused alveolus — even a poorly ventilated one — is now filled with 100 per cent oxygen. A PaO2 stuck below 350 mmHg means a meaningful fraction of the cardiac output is bypassing ventilated alveoli altogether. This single test redirects the whole management: a correctable patient gets oxygen and treatment of the cause; an uncorrectable patient gets PEEP, recruitment, proning, and consideration of ECMO. Do not keep escalating FiO2 in a patient who fails the 100 per cent test — that is the definition of refractory shunt.[1][3]
The P/F ratio and the Berlin ARDS definition
The P/F ratio (PaO2 divided by FiO2) is the simplest oxygenation index and the backbone of the Berlin ARDS definition. It is measured on a minimum of 5 cmH2O PEEP (or CPAP). A normal P/F is above 400 mmHg; a P/F below 300 (with a qualifying clinical insult and bilateral imaging not fully explained by cardiac failure) defines ARDS.[2]
Berlin ARDS severity — the P/F ratio (on PEEP/CPAP at least 5 cmH2O)
| Berlin category | P/F ratio (mmHg) | Clinical implication |
|---|---|---|
| Mild | 200 to 300 | Close monitoring; HFNC or NIV often sufficient; lung-protective ventilation if intubated |
| Moderate | 100 to 200 | Usually intubated; lung-protective ventilation + PEEP titration; consider proning if worsening |
| Severe | below 100 | Full ARDS bundle: low Vt, higher-PEEP strategy, proning more than 16 h/day, consider cisatracurium and VV-ECMO referral |
The P/F ratio is not perfect — it depends on FiO2 (the ratio improves then paradoxically worsens as FiO2 rises, because of the shunt effect), on PEEP, and on chest-wall compliance — but it is universally available and is the entry criterion for virtually every ARDS trial. It frames the mechanism: a low P/F on a high FiO2 is shunt-dominant disease, which is exactly why ARDS management is built around PEEP and recruitment rather than FiO2.[2]
Oxygenation indices — P/F, A-a gradient, and the Oxygenation Index
Three indices rank the severity of oxygenation failure. Each captures something slightly different.[2]
Oxygenation indices — what each measures and when to use it
| Index | Formula | Normal / threshold | Strengths and weaknesses |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/F ratio | PaO2 / FiO2 | Normal above 400; ARDS below 300 | Simplest, universal, trial entry criterion. Conflates FiO2 and PEEP effects; not valid when comparing across different PEEP levels |
| A-a gradient | PAO2 − PaO2 (PAO2 from the alveolar gas equation) | below 15 young, below 25 elderly | The best diagnostic index — separates hypoventilation (normal) from a lung problem (high). Requires the full alveolar gas equation |
| Oxygenation Index (OI) | (FiO2 × MAP × 100) / PaO2 | Normal below 5; above 5 abnormal; above 40 severe | Incorporates mean airway pressure (MAP), so it rewards lung-protective low-pressure strategies and is the best severity tracker on the ventilator. Higher = worse; classically an ECMO trigger in paediatric ARDS |
The Oxygenation Index (OI) is underused in adult practice but is the gold-standard severity marker in paediatric ARDS and is part of many ECMO referral criteria: OI above 40 for more than 4 hours is a classic VV-ECMO trigger in children. The principle is the same at any age — the more pressure and oxygen you must apply to achieve a given PaO2, the sicker the lung.[2]
The shunt equation and venous admixture
The shunt equation (Qs/Qt) formally quantifies the fraction of cardiac output that perfuses non-ventilated alveoli — the strict definition of "how much shunt is there?" [1]
Qs/Qt = (CcO2 − CaO2) / (CcO2 − CvO2) [1]
Where CcO2 is the end-capillary oxygen content (the theoretical maximum, calculated from the PAO2), CaO2 is the measured arterial oxygen content, and CvO2 is the mixed venous oxygen content (from a pulmonary artery catheter). Normal Qs/Qt is below 5 per cent; above 10 per cent is significant; in severe ARDS it can exceed 30 to 50 per cent. Because it requires a mixed venous sample from a PA catheter, it is rarely calculated at the bedside — but the concept is examined, and the bedside 100 per cent oxygen test is its practical surrogate.[1]
Venous admixture is the unifying concept: the total amount of mixed venous blood that effectively mixes with oxygenated end-capillary blood and drags down the arterial content. It has two components — true shunt (V/Q = 0, blood perfusing completely unventilated alveoli) and low-V/Q units (blood perfusing poorly ventilated alveoli that are not fully equilibrated). The crucial practical point: venous admixture worsens as mixed venous oxygen (CvO2) falls. A falling CvO2 — from low cardiac output, fever, shivering, or high extraction — magnifies the effect of any existing shunt, because the venous blood dumped into the arterial tree is more desaturated. This is why improving cardiac output, haemoglobin, and reducing oxygen demand (analgesia, sedation, paralysis, fever control) can improve PaO2 in a shunt patient without touching the lung — you raise the CvO2 and dilute the shunted blood. Conversely, the same shunt looks far worse in a shocked, extracting patient.[1][3]
Mixed venous and central venous oxygen saturation — SvO2 and ScvO2
Oxygen saturation in venous blood reflects the balance between oxygen delivery (DO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2) — captured by the Fick principle, VO2 = CO × (CaO2 − CvO2). Rearranged, the venous oxygen content (and hence SvO2) is what is left over after the tissues have taken what they need, so it is a sensitive, real-time index of whether delivery is keeping up with demand.[1]
- SvO2 — mixed venous oxygen saturation, sampled from a pulmonary artery catheter (the true mixed venous, blending SVC, IVC and coronary sinus blood). Normal 65 to 75 per cent (mean about 73).
- ScvO2 — central venous oxygen saturation, sampled from the superior vena cava / right atrium via a central line (no PA catheter needed). Normal about 70 per cent (65 to 75). [1]
SvO2 versus ScvO2 — what each measures and when they diverge
| Feature | SvO2 (mixed venous) | ScvO2 (central venous) |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling site | Pulmonary artery (true mix of SVC + IVC + coronary sinus) | Superior vena cava / right atrium |
| Normal value | 65 to 75 per cent (mean ~73) | ~70 per cent (65 to 75) |
| Relationship in health | Reference standard | Closely tracks SvO2 (within a few per cent) |
| Relationship in shock | Falls earliest (captures desaturated splanchnic and coronary sinus blood) | Lags / overestimates SvO2 — ScvO2 sits above SvO2 because the desaturated splanchnic and coronary blood is absent from the central sample |
| Practical role | Gold standard but needs a PA catheter | Surrogate for resuscitation targets; easier to obtain (central line only); used in early goal-directed therapy |
The ScvO2 − SvO2 gradient. In a healthy, well-perfused patient the two values are close (within 2 to 3 per cent). In shock the gradient widens and reverses: ScvO2 reads higher than SvO2, by up to 8 to 10 per cent, because the splanchnic and renal beds (drained by the IVC) and the myocardium (drained by the coronary sinus) extract oxygen aggressively and their desaturated blood enters the mixed venous sample but not the central venous sample. The practical message: ScvO2 is a reasonable trend surrogate, but in established shock it will systematically overstate how well the patient is really perfused — a normal ScvO2 does not exclude ongoing tissue hypoxia.[1]
Interpreting a low SvO2 / ScvO2
A low SvO2 (below 65 per cent) or ScvO2 (below 70 per cent) means delivery is not keeping up with consumption. By the Fick equation there are only four variables to interrogate — the same four you optimise in any shocked or hypoxaemic patient:[1]
The four determinants of venous oxygen saturation — and how to correct each
| Determinant (falling this lowers SvO2) | Why it lowers SvO2 | Bedside correction |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac output (CO) | Less flow delivers less O2, so tissues extract more per litre — venous blood leaves more desaturated | Fluid challenge if preload-responsive; inotrope (dobutamine, milrinone) if pump failure; restore rhythm |
| Arterial oxygen content (CaO2) — SaO2 and Hb | Less O2 per litre delivered means higher extraction for the same VO2 | Raise SaO2 (oxygen, PEEP, recruitment); transfuse if Hb low and ischaemic/hypoxic |
| Oxygen consumption (VO2) | Higher demand forces higher extraction | Fever control, analgesia and sedation, treat shivering, paralysis if necessary, reduce work of breathing (ventilate) |
| Oxygen extraction capability | Sepsis/cyanide poison oxidative phosphorylation — extraction fails and SvO2 paradoxically rises | Treat the cause; in sepsis a high SvO2 with rising lactate signals cytopathic dysoxia |
So when the SvO2 or ScvO2 is low, work through the four columns in order: is the pump failing? is the haemoglobin or saturation low? is demand too high? Most low-SvO2 states in the ICU correct with fluid, inotrope, transfusion, oxygen, and fever/agitation control. [1]
Interpreting a high SvO2 / ScvO2 (above 80 per cent)
A high venous saturation is not reassuring — it usually means the tissues cannot extract or use the oxygen being delivered:[1]
- Sepsis and septic shock — cytopathic (mitochondrial) dysfunction impairs oxidative phosphorylation; SvO2 is high while lactate rises and the patient remains shocked. This is the classic "high SvO2, high lactate" paradox of impaired oxygen utilisation.
- Cyanide toxicity — blocks cytochrome c oxidase; extraction collapses and SvO2 climbs, often with a rising lactate and a normal-appearing SaO2.
- Left-to-right intracardiac shunt — oxygenated blood recirculates into the venous side and artefactually raises the mixed venous saturation.
- Over-resuscitation / very high DO2 with low VO2 — deep sedation, hypothermia, high-flow oxygen in a paralysed patient can push SvO2 above 80 per cent simply because delivery far exceeds demand. [1]
The teaching point: a normal or high SvO2 does not equal adequate tissue oxygenation. Always read it alongside the lactate, the capillary refill, the mottling score, and the clinical picture — a high SvO2 with a rising lactate is a red flag for impaired utilisation, not a sign of success. [1]
The clinical approach to the hypoxaemic patient
The three-step approach to hypoxaemia — A-a gradient, image, treat
Step 1 — Calculate the A-a gradient from an ABG
Take an arterial blood gas on a known FiO2. Compute PAO2 = FiO2 x (760 - 47) - PaCO2/0.8, then the A-a gradient (PAO2 - PaO2). A NORMAL gradient (below 15 young, below 25 elderly, age/4 + 4) points to hypoventilation (high PaCO2) or low inspired PO2 (altitude) — the alveoli are fine; VENTILATE or raise FiO2. An ELEVATED gradient points to a lung (or heart) problem — go to Step 2.
Step 2 — If the gradient is elevated, localise with imaging
The chest X-ray (and bedside lung ultrasound) separates diffuse disease (pulmonary oedema, ARDS, pneumonia) from focal disease (consolidation, atelectasis, effusion, pneumothorax). The echocardiogram separates a cardiac cause (acute pulmonary oedema from LV failure, a right-to-left shunt through a PFO, pulmonary hypertension) from a primary lung problem. If the CXR is clear and the echo is normal, think pulmonary embolism (CTPA), early interstitial disease, pulmonary vasculitis, or a hidden shunt (hepatopulmonary syndrome, pulmonary AVM).
Step 3 — Treat the mechanism, not the number
V/Q mismatch and diffusion impairment: OXYGEN plus treat the cause (antibiotics, bronchodilators, diurese the oedema). HYPOVENTILATION: VENTILATION (NIV or intubation) and reverse the cause — oxygen buys time but will not stop CO2 rising. SHUNT (fails the 100 per cent oxygen test, low P/F on a high FiO2): PEEP and alveolar recruitment, lung-protective ventilation, prone positioning, inhaled vasodilators, and VV-ECMO for refractory disease. In parallel, optimise the non-pulmonary determinants of arterial oxygenation — haemoglobin, cardiac output, and oxygen demand — because raising the mixed venous oxygen (SvO2/ScvO2) dilutes any shunt.
The three steps collapse the five mechanisms into a single pathway: the gradient tells you whether to ventilate or image; the image tells you where the problem is; the mechanism (and the 100 per cent oxygen test) tells you whether the patient needs oxygen or PEEP. The whole framework is designed to stop the two commonest errors in hypoxaemia — escalating FiO2 in a shunt patient who needs PEEP, and chasing a lung problem in a hypoventilating patient who needs ventilation.[1][1]
SAQ — The five mechanisms and the A–a gradient
10 minutes · 10 marks
A 64-year-old woman on the ward is hypoxaemic (SpO2 88% on 4 L/min via nasal cannula). ABG: pH 7.38, PaCO2 36, PaO2 56 on FiO2 0.36. She has no chest pain. The examiners ask you to list the five mechanisms of hypoxaemia, calculate her A–a gradient, and explain how the gradient and the response to 100% oxygen localise the cause.
SAQ — Refractory hypoxaemia and the shunt lung
10 minutes · 10 marks
A 49-year-old man with severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 75 on FiO2 0.9, PEEP 14) is being ventilated with a low tidal volume. He fails the 100% oxygen test (PaO2 130 on FiO2 1.0). The examiners ask you to explain why oxygen alone is failing and to outline a stepwise approach to the refractory shunt lung.
Red flags
Prognosis
Outcomes by mechanism and oxygenation index — the evidence
| Scenario | Prognostic marker | Outcome implication |
|---|---|---|
| ARDS severity (Berlin) | P/F below 100 (severe) | Hospital mortality about 45 per cent; drives the full bundle (proning, ECMO). P/F 200 to 300 (mild) mortality about 27 per cent[2] |
| Paediatric / refractory ARDS | Oxygenation Index (OI) above 40, sustained | Classic VV-ECMO trigger; high mortality without advanced support |
| Refractory shunt on 100 per cent O2 | PaO2 below 350 on FiO2 1.0 | Indicates significant shunt; FiO2 escalation is futile — needs PEEP, proning, ECMO |
| Hypoventilation | Normal A-a gradient | Excellent once ventilation is restored — the lung is structurally intact |
| Altitude / low inspired PO2 | Normal A-a gradient, corrects with O2 | Excellent with oxygen or descent; watch for high-altitude pulmonary oedema |
| Persistently low SvO2 (below 65 per cent) | Indicates DO2 below VO2 | portends impending circulatory collapse and rising lactate if not corrected |
| High SvO2 (above 80 per cent) with rising lactate | Impaired oxygen utilisation (sepsis, cyanide) | Masked hypoxia — high mortality unless the underlying cause is treated |
Clinical pearls
Key trials and evidence
ARDS Definition Task Force — the Berlin Definition (PMID 22797452)
Study design
Consensus panel plus meta-analysis of 4188 patients across 4 multicentre datasets
Population
Acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure within 1 week of a known insult, bilateral imaging not fully explained by cardiac failure
Key output
P/F ratio on PEEP/CPAP at least 5 cmH2O grades severity: mild 200 to 300, moderate 100 to 200, severe below 100
Mortality by grade
Mild 27 per cent, moderate 32 per cent, severe 45 per cent — severity predicted mortality and ventilator-free days
Clinical bottom line
The P/F ratio is the universal ARDS entry and severity criterion — and a low P/F on a high FiO2 signals a shunt-dominant lung needing PEEP and recruitment, not more oxygen
Mancini, Rodriguez-Roisin et al. — why PEEP works in ARDS (PMID 11704594)
Study design
Prospective physiological study — 8 patients with early ARDS, using the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET)
Intervention
Protective ventilatory strategy (low Vt, PEEP set 2 cmH2O above the lower inflection point) versus baseline conventional ventilation, at the same FiO2
Key finding
PaO2 rose from 93 to 166 mmHg, and intrapulmonary shunt fell from 39 per cent to 31 per cent — the oxygenation improvement tracked the fall in shunt, driven by alveolar recruitment
Clinical bottom line
The mechanism by which PEEP improves oxygenation in ARDS is REDUCTION OF SHUNT (recruiting collapsed alveoli), not addition of oxygen — the physiological proof that shunt is treated by recruitment, not by FiO2
Petersson and Glenny — Gas Exchange in the Lung (PMID 37816345)
Article type
Comprehensive review — Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2023
Scope
The principles of lung gas exchange and the mechanisms of hypoxaemia and hypercapnia: V/Q mismatch, shunt, diffusion limitation, and the metrics (A-a gradient, shunt equation, dead space) that quantify the deviation from ideal gas exchange
Clinical bottom line
The modern authoritative reference for the five-mechanism framework and the oxygenation metrics used at the bedside — the basis for the A-a gradient, shunt equation, and 100 per cent oxygen test discussed throughout this topic
References
- [1]Petersson J, Glenny RW. Gas Exchange in the Lung Semin Respir Crit Care Med, 2023.PMID 37816345
- [2]ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition JAMA, 2012.PMID 22797452
- [3]Mancini M, Zavala E, Mancini J, et al. Mechanisms of pulmonary gas exchange improvement during a protective ventilatory strategy in acute respiratory distress syndrome Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001.PMID 11704594