[1]

Diagnostic workup

Diagnostic workup of suspected DAH in ICU — the 5-question algorithm

  1. Is it DAH? — Falling Hb (>1–2 g/dL/24 h) + diffuse infiltrates + hypoxaemia, with or without haemoptysis. Haemoptysis is absent in up to one-third because bleeding is distal and the patient may be intubated. Do not wait for haemoptysis to make the diagnosis.[2] }
  2. Is it capillaritis or bland? — Send ANCA (PR3 + MPO ELISA), anti-GBM, ANA, anti-dsDNA, complement C3/C4, cryoglobulins, urinalysis. If ANCA/anti-GBM positive → immune capillaritis → treat aggressively. If coagulopathy alone → bland bleeding → correct coagulopathy.
  3. Is there a pulmonary-renal syndrome? — Urinalysis for dysmorphic RBCs/casts, urine ACR/PCR, creatinine. DAH + nephritic sediment = pulmonary-renal syndrome until proven otherwise. Always catheterise for urine in DAH.[5] }
  4. Confirm with bronchoscopy — Sequential BAL aliquots become progressively bloodier (the "haemorrhagic BAL" sign). Also rules out infection (the great mimic). Hemosiderin-laden macrophages appear after 48–72 h and date the bleed. BAL is safe even in hypoxic/intubated patients.[2] }
  5. Tissue diagnosis — biopsy is often deferred in ICU. Renal biopsy shows pauci-immune necrotising crescentic GN (AAV) or linear IgG deposition (anti-GBM). Lung biopsy is rarely needed and is high-risk in hypoxic DAH. Treat empirically before biopsy if the patient is unstable — delays for tissue kill patients.[6] }

Induction therapy — choosing the agent

Induction immunosuppression and plasma exchange pathway for DAH vasculitis
FigureMethylprednisolone pulse + cyclophosphamide or rituximab; PLEX for severe DAH, dialysis-dependent RPGN, or anti-GBM. Do not delay treatment for biopsy if unstable.
Cyclophosphamide vs rituximab for AAV induction
FeatureCyclophosphamideRituximab
MechanismDNA cross-linking alkylatorAnti-CD20 → B-cell depletion
Dose (induction)15 mg/kg IV q2–3w (pulse) OR 2 mg/kg/day PO × 3–6 months375 mg/m² weekly × 4 OR 1 g × 2 (days 1 + 15)
EvidenceStandard for 40 yearsRAVE 2010: non-inferior[3]; RITUXVAS 2010: non-inferior[7]
Best forLimited access, low costRelapsing disease, women of childbearing potential, PR3-ANCA
Avoid inYoung (infertility, malignancy), cytopenicHypogammaglobulinaemia, chronic HBV (reactivation)
Time to effectWeeksWeeks (B-cells deplete within 1–2 weeks)
Cumulative toxicityDose-dependent (leukaemia, bladder, infertility)No cumulative limit
PJP prophylaxisRequiredRequired (during steroid phase)

Plasma exchange — when and how

Plasma exchange for severe AAV / DAH — practical protocol

  1. Indications — (a) Anti-GBM positive (mandatory), (b) creatinine >5.7 mg/dL (500 µmol/L) or dialysis-dependent RPGN, (c) severe DAH with hypoxaemia, (d) double-positive ANCA + anti-GBM. MEPEX supported PLEX for renal recovery; PEXIVAS challenged the mortality benefit.[4] }[8] }
  2. Prescription — Exchange 1 plasma volume (~60 mL/kg) per session, daily or alternate days, 7–14 sessions over 2–3 weeks. Replacement: 5% albumin ± fresh-frozen plasma (FFP preferred in active bleeding / pre-procedure). Anticoagulate carefully — DAH patients bleed.
  3. Vascular access — Central venous catheter (jugular preferred). Insert early; do not delay PLEX for line placement in anti-GBM.
  4. Monitor — Anti-GBM titre (aim undetectable before stopping), renal function, respiratory status, fibrinogen, ionised calcium (citrate chelation), bleeding. Re-biopsy not required.
  5. Stop — When anti-GBM titre negative (usually 9–12 sessions) OR clinical stability achieved. Transition to maintenance rituximab/azathioprine. PLEX does not replace immunosuppression.
  6. Risks — Bleeding (especially if FFP not co-administered), line infection, hypocalcaemia, hypotension, allergy (FFP), hepatitis B reactivation, venous access complications. Co-administer PJP prophylaxis and vaccination planning for rituximab.[4] }
Anti-GBM vs AAV — different diseases, different rules
FeatureAnti-GBM (Goodpasture)AAV (GPA / MPA / EGPA)
AntibodyAnti-α3(IV) collagen (anti-GBM)ANCA (PR3 or MPO)
Biopsy IFLinear IgG along GBMPauci-immune (scant/no Ig)
DAH frequency~40–60%Variable (MPA > GPA)
Plasma exchangeSTANDARD for allSelective (severe/dialysis only)
RelapseRare (after titre clearance)Common (50% in 5 y)
MaintenanceUsually short (stop when Ab negative)18–24 months minimum
Double-positiveBehaves as AAV — needs maintenance
[1]

Landmark trials

RITUXVAS (Jones 2010, NEJM) — rituximab in renal AAV

RCT: 76 patients with newly diagnosed renal AAV. Rituximab (375 mg/m² weekly × 4) + 2 cyclophosphamide pulses vs cyclophosphamide continuation (then azathioprine). Both arms received steroids.

[1]

PEXIVAS (Walsh 2020, NEJM) — plasma exchange in severe AAV

RCT: 704 patients with severe AAV (eGFR <50 or DAH). Plasma exchange + standard immunosuppression vs standard immunosuppression alone. Largest AAV trial ever.

Practice implication: PLEX is still indicated for (1) anti-GBM disease (PEXIVAS excluded anti-GBM), (2) dialysis-dependent AAV at presentation with crescentic biopsy, (3) double-positive ANCA + anti-GBM. No longer routine for moderate AAV or isolated DAH without severe renal failure.

[1]

ADVOCATE (Jayne 2021, NEJM) — avacopan, a C5a-receptor blocker

RCT: 331 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing AAV. Avacopan 30 mg PO bd (glucocorticoid-sparing) vs prednisone taper, both on rituximab or cyclophosphamide induction.

MIRACLE (Wechsler 2017, NEJM) — mepolizumab for EGPA

RCT: 136 patients with relapsing/refractory EGPA. Mepolizumab 300 mg SC monthly (anti-IL-5) vs placebo.

EGPA-specific considerations

GPA upper-airway disease

ICU supportive care and pitfalls

Differential diagnosis in the ICU

Prognosis and outcomes

MEPEX (Jayne 2007, JASN) — plasma exchange in renal AAV

RCT: 137 patients with severe renal AAV (creatinine >5.7 mg/dL / 500 µmol/L). Plasma exchange vs methylprednisolone pulses, both with oral cyclophosphamide.

Overall AAV prognosis: 1-year mortality 5–15% (higher with DAH, age >65, ESRD at presentation, FFS ≥2, cardiac involvement in EGPA). 5-year survival 70–80% with modern therapy. DAH alone is not an independent mortality predictor but signals severe disease. EGPA cardiac involvement is the single biggest excess-mortality driver across AAV.[1] }

Maintenance and relapse

One-page ICU decision aid — suspected pulmonary vasculitis + DAH
StepActionTime-critical?
1. RecogniseFalling Hb + diffuse infiltrates ± haemoptysis ± AKIYes
2. ResuscitateO₂ (intubate if hypoxaemic), transfuse, lung-protective ventilationYes
3. BloodsANCA (PR3+MPO ELISA), anti-GBM, ANA, complements, cryoglobulins, U&E, urine MC&SYes (within 1 h)
4. BronchoscopySequential BAL — progressively bloodier = DAH; send for infectionWithin 6 h
5. CT chestGround-glass ± consolidation, central/perihilar; CTPA if PE possibleWithin 6 h
6. Biopsy (renal)Pauci-immune crescentic GN (AAV) or linear IgG (anti-GBM); defer if unstableWithin 24–48 h
7. Treat empiricallyMethylprednisolone 1 g IV × 3 → if unstable, treat before biopsyYes
8. Add induction agentCyclophosphamide 15 mg/kg IV OR rituximab 375 mg/m² weekly × 4Within 24 h
9. Plasma exchangeIf anti-GBM positive, dialysis-dependent, or severe DAHIf anti-GBM: yes
10. SupportiveRRT, transfusion, PJP prophylaxis, infection surveillanceOngoing
11. Plan maintenanceRituximab q6 months OR azathioprine for 18–24 monthsAfter remission
[1]

References

  1. [1]Lyons PA, Peters JE, Alberici F, et al. Genetically distinct subsets within ANCA-associated vasculitis N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22808956
  2. [2]Lauque D, Cadranel J, Lazor R, et al. Microscopic polyangiitis with alveolar hemorrhage. A study of 29 cases and review of the literature. Groupe d'Etudes et de Recherche sur les Maladies Orphelines Pulmonaires (GERMOP) Medicine (Baltimore), 2000.PMID 10941351
  3. [3]Stone JH, Merkel PA, Spiera R, et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20647199
  4. [4]Jayne DR, Gaskin G, Rasmussen N, et al. Randomized trial of plasma exchange or high-dosage methylprednisolone as adjunctive therapy for severe renal vasculitis J Am Soc Nephrol, 2007.PMID 17582159
  5. [5]Greco A, Rizzo MI, De Virgilio A, et al. Goodpasture's syndrome: a clinical update Autoimmun Rev, 2015.PMID 25462583
  6. [6]Audemard-Verrier A, De Boysson H, Cottin V, et al. Alveolar hemorrhage in anti-basement membrane antibody disease: a series of 28 cases Medicine (Baltimore), 2007.PMID 17505257
  7. [7]Jones RB, Tervaert JW, Hauser T, et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20647198
  8. [8]Walsh M, Merkel PA, Peh CA, et al. Plasma Exchange and Glucocorticoids in Severe ANCA-Associated Vasculitis N Engl J Med, 2020.PMID 32053298
  9. [9]Jayne DRW, Merkel PA, Schall TJ, et al. Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis N Engl J Med, 2021.PMID 33596356
  10. [10]Wechsler ME, Akuthota P, Jayne D, et al. Mepolizumab or Placebo for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28514601
  11. [11]Wechsler ME, Pesci A, Pelaia G, et al. Benralizumab versus Mepolizumab for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis N Engl J Med, 2024.PMID 38393328