Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

ICU TopicsToxicology

ICU · Toxicology

Dermatological emergencies in ICU: SJS, TEN, and DRESS

Also known as Stevens-Johnson syndrome · Toxic epidermal necrolysis · Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms · Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome · Lyell syndrome

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) requiring ICU admission. SJS/TEN: immune-mediated epidermal necrolysis triggered by drugs (80%) or infections (Mycoplasma, HSV). Mucocutaneous: target lesions, bullae, sheet-like epidermal detachment. SJS <10% BSA detachment, SJS-TEN overlap 10-30%, TEN 30%. High mortality (SJS ~10%, TEN ~30%). DRESS (DIHS): delayed hypersensitivity (2-8 weeks post-exposure), rash + fever + lymphadenopathy + eosinophilia + organ dysfunction (hepatitis, nephritis, pneumonitis). Treatment: STOP culprit drug, supportive care (fluid, nutrition, temperature control, analgesia, infection prevention), ICU for TEN (fluid loss like burn, airway involvement), IVIG controversial, debridement controversial, ophthalmology early.

high30 referencesUpdated 30 June 2026
On this page & tools

Your progress

Saved locally on this device.

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

TEN with >30% BSA detachment — mortality ~30%, fluid/nutrition/infection management like major burnsAirway involvement (oral mucosa, tracheobronchial) — may need intubation; mucosal sloughing can cause airway obstructionOphthalmology MUST be involved within 24h — ocular involvement causes blindness if untreatedDRESS can reactivate months after stopping drug — long course, re-challenge dangerousSJS/TEN is NOT a burn — skin handling differs (avoid aggressive debridement in most centres)

Your progress

Saved locally on this device.

Target exams

CICMFFICMEDIC

Red flags

TEN with >30% BSA detachment — mortality ~30%, fluid/nutrition/infection management like major burnsAirway involvement (oral mucosa, tracheobronchial) — may need intubation; mucosal sloughing can cause airway obstructionOphthalmology MUST be involved within 24h — ocular involvement causes blindness if untreatedDRESS can reactivate months after stopping drug — long course, re-challenge dangerousSJS/TEN is NOT a burn — skin handling differs (avoid aggressive debridement in most centres)

In one line

SJS/TEN: immune-mediated epidermal necrolysis from drugs (80%) or infection. Target lesions, bullae, sheet-like detachment. SJS <10% BSA, overlap 10-30%, TEN >30%. Mortality ~10-30%. DRESS: delayed (2-8 weeks) rash + fever + eosinophilia + organ dysfunction. Treatment: STOP drug, supportive care (fluid/nutrition/infection like burns for TEN), ophthalmology early, IVIG controversial.

[1]
Cinematic ICU scene of a patient with widespread target lesions and sheet-like epidermal detachment involving mucous membranes, a drug-allergy history note, fluid resuscitation and wound-care dressings, a SCORTEN score on the whiteboard, clinical-blue lighting, no faces, no text
FigureSevere cutaneous adverse reactions — SJS/TEN (drug- or infection-driven epidermal necrolysis, BSA detachment, mucosal involvement, SCORTEN-stratified) and DRESS (drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, weeks after exposure). Stop the culprit drug, supportive ICU care in a burns-style model, and specialist burn-unit transfer for TEN.

SJS vs SJS-TEN overlap vs TEN vs DRESS

FeatureSJSSJS-TEN overlapTENDRESS (DIHS)
Detached BSA<10%10-30%>30%Variable (often morbilliform, may exfoliate)
Onset1-4 weeks post-drug1-4 weeks1-4 weeks2-8 weeks
Mucosal involvementYes (≥2 sites)YesYesVariable (less severe)
Target lesionsAtypicalAtypicalRareNo
FeverYesYesYesHigh (38-40°C)
EosinophiliaNoNoNoYes (hallmark)
Organ dysfunctionRareVariableCommon (liver, kidney)Yes (liver, kidney, lung, heart)
LymphadenopathyNoNoNoYes (hallmark)
Mortality~10%~25%~30% (up to 10%)~5-10%
Fluid lossMinimalModerateMassive (like burn)Minimal
RecurrenceDrug-specificDrug-specificDrug-specificCan reactivate months later
[1]

Acute management of suspected SJS/TEN

  1. STOP all suspected drugs — antibiotics (sulphonamides), anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, carbamazepine, phenytoin), allopurinol, NSAIDs (oxicam). Withdraw ALL non-essential drugs
  2. Assess severity — %BSA detached, mucosal sites, organ function. Calculate SCORTEN (within 24h and 72h)
  3. ICU admission if: TEN (fluid loss like burn), airway involvement, organ failure, extensive mucosal disease
  4. Fluid resuscitation — TEN: crystalloid 2-4 mL/kg/%BSA (LESS than burn — Parkland overestimates). Monitor urine output 0.5-1 mL/kg/h
  5. Nutrition — EARLY enteral feeding within 24-48h. Nasogastric tube (oral mucosa too painful). Caloric needs ~1.5x basal
  6. Analgesia — multimodal: paracetamol, opioids (fentanyl PCA). Mucosal pain severe
  7. Infection prevention — reverse isolation, aseptic technique, SURVEILLANCE cultures (skin, urine, blood). Avoid prophylactic antibiotics. Treat confirmed infection promptly
  8. Ophthalmology review WITHIN 24h — ocular involvement causes blindness. Topical steroids, lubricants, amniotic membrane
  9. Skin care — leave intact blisters, non-adherent dressings (Mepitel, Jelonet), silicone dressings. Avoid aggressive debridement (controversial)
  10. Airway — if tracheobronchial involvement: may need intubation. Approach carefully (mucosal sloughing → difficult airway, bleeding)
[1] [1]

Pathophysiology

Educational schematic of SJS/TEN pathogenesis: drug antigen presentation on MHC class I, CD8 T-cell and NK-cell cytotoxicity, granulysin-mediated keratinocyte apoptosis, and sheet-like epidermal detachment with mucosal involvement
FigureSJS/TEN pathophysiology — delayed type-IV cytotoxicity. Granulysin is the key soluble mediator of keratinocyte death; BSA detachment and mucosal involvement define severity (SJS under 10%, overlap 10–30%, TEN over 30%).

Mechanism of SJS/TEN

SJS/TEN is a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction. Drug metabolites presented by MHC-I to CD8+ T cells and NK cells → release of granulysin (key mediator, 15-fold higher than controls), perforin/granzyme, FasL → keratinocyte apoptosis → epidermal necrosis and detachment. Genetic predisposition: HLA-B15:02 (carbamazepine, Han Chinese/Southeast Asian), HLA-B57:01 (abacavir), HLA-B*58:01 (allopurinol). Onset: 1-4 weeks after drug exposure. Rapid progression over 1-14 days.

[1]

Mechanism of DRESS

DRESS is a T-cell mediated hypersensitivity with viral reactivation (HHV-6, HHV-7, CMV, EBV). Drug → T-cell activation → cytokine storm (IL-5, IFN-γ) → eosinophilia + organ inflammation. Two-step model: (1) drug sensitisation, (2) viral reactivation (HHV-6) triggers flare. Explains delayed onset (2-8 weeks), biphasic course, and reactivation after drug withdrawal.

[1]

Clinical features

Classification panel comparing SJS, SJS-TEN overlap, TEN, and DRESS by BSA detachment, mucosal sites, latency, eosinophilia, and visceral involvement
FigureSpectrum classification — SJS/TEN is an epidermal necrolysis continuum stratified by BSA; DRESS is a delayed hypersensitivity with eosinophilia and multi-organ involvement, weeks after high-risk drugs.

Epidemiology

[1]

High-risk drugs for SJS/TEN (mnemonic: 'A NAVIGATOR')

  • Allopurinol (highest risk in Asia)
  • NSAIDs (oxicams — piroxicam, meloxicam)
  • Anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, carbamazepine, phenytoin)
  • Vancomycin (linear IgA, overlaps)
  • Isoniazid
  • Ganciclovir
  • Antibiotics (sulphonamides — cotrimoxazole)
  • Thiazides/chlorthalidone
  • Oxicam NSAIDs
  • Ritonavir/nevirapine [1]

High-risk populations: HLA-B15:02+ (carbamazepine — screen Han Chinese/SE Asian/Thai), HLA-B58:01+ (allopurinol — screen Han Chinese/Korean/Thai), HLA-B*57:01+ (abacavir — screen all).

[1]

SAQ — Toxic epidermal necrolysis on allopurinol

10 minutes · 10 marks

A 68-year-old Han Chinese man started allopurinol 3 weeks ago for gout. He now has fever (39.2°C), painful oral/ocular/urethral mucositis, atypical target lesions and sheet-like epidermal detachment of 35% BSA, with a positive Nikolsky sign. SCORTEN at 24 h = 4 (age >40, HR 124, %BSA detached >10, urea 14 mmol/L, bicarbonate 18 mmol/L; no malignancy, glucose normal). LFTs ALT 220, creatinine 145.

[1]

SAQ — DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms)

10 minutes · 10 marks

A 44-year-old woman is admitted 5 weeks after starting carbamazepine for trigeminal neuralgia with a diffuse morbilliform rash, fever 39.5°C, cervical lymphadenopathy, facial oedema, eosinophils 2.8 ×10⁹/L, atypical lymphocytes on the blood film, ALT 480 U/L, creatinine 200 μmol/L and a normal INR. The team plans to discharge her on antihistamines once the rash fades.

[1]

Clinical pearls

High-yield SJS/TEN/DRESS points for CICM/FFICM exam

  1. SJS/TEN is a MEDICAL EMERGENCY. Stop ALL suspected drugs IMMEDIATELY. Every day of continued exposure increases BSA detachment and mortality. The single most important intervention is WITHDRAWAL of the culprit drug.[1] }
  2. TEN behaves like a BURN but is NOT a burn. Similarities: fluid loss, thermoregulatory failure, infection risk, hypermetabolism. Differences: (1) LESS fluid needed than burn (Parkland formula overestimates — use 2/3 of burn estimate). (2) DO NOT aggressively debride (controversial — most centres leave intact skin). (3) Mucosal involvement (oral, ocular, genital, tracheobronchial) is HALLMARK — burns don't have this. (4) Different healing pattern (re-epithelialisation from hair follicles).[2] }
  3. SCORTEN at 24h and 72h. The mortality score (7 variables). IMPORTANT: calculate TWICE (admission and day 3) — SCORTEN at 72h is MORE accurate. Score ≥3 = high mortality (>35%) → aggressive supportive care, consider transfer to specialist burn/dermatology unit. ABCD-10 is newer and may be more accurate.[7] }
  4. Fluid management in TEN: crystalloid 2-4 mL/kg/%BSA in first 24h (LESS than burn). Parkland (4 mL/kg/%BSA) overestimates. Use urine output (0.5-1 mL/kg/h) and lactate to guide. Monitor for hypovolaemia AND fluid overload (skin cannot regulate temperature, so fluid overload → oedema → compartment syndrome). Electrolytes: hypernatraemia (free water loss), hypoalbuminaemia, hypokalaemia.[1] }
  5. Nutrition EARLY and AGGRESSIVE. Nasogastric tube within 24-48h. Oral mucosa too painful for eating. Caloric needs: ~1.5x basal metabolic rate (hypermetabolic like burn). Protein: 1.5-2 g/kg/day. Rationale: wound healing requires protein and calories. EARLY enteral feeding reduces bacterial translocation and infection. Parenteral nutrition if enteral fails (rare).[2] }
  6. Infection is the leading cause of death in TEN. Skin barrier lost → Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas, Candida. Management: (1) REVERSE ISOLATION (single room, gloves, gown). (2) ASEPTIC technique for all skin contact. (3) SURVEILLANCE cultures (skin, urine, blood, sputum) every 2-3 days. (4) AVOID prophylactic antibiotics (resistance, Clostridioides difficile). (5) TREAT confirmed infection promptly (broad-spectrum if septic, de-escalate to sensitivities). (6) Remove invasive lines ASAP.[4] }
  7. Ophthalmology MUST review within 24h. Ocular involvement in 50-80% of SJS/TEN → symblepharon, corneal ulceration, blindness in 3-10% (long-term). Management: (1) Topical steroids (prednisolone acetate 1%). (2) Lubricants (preservative-free). (3) Antibiotic prophylaxis (chloramphenicol). (4) Amniotic membrane transplantation (within 5 days — reduces symblepharon and corneal damage). (5) Daily review by ophthalmology. DELAYED ophthalmology review = permanent blindness.[3] }
  8. Airway involvement in SJS/TEN. Tracheobronchial mucosal sloughing → airway obstruction, bronchorrhoea, pneumothorax, ARDS. Indications for intubation: stridor, respiratory distress, hypoxia, extensive oral/nasal involvement. AIRWAY ALERT: mucosal bleeding and sloughing → difficult intubation. Use: smaller ETT, video laryngoscopy, avoid nasal intubation (nasal mucosa sloughing), have surgical airway backup.[1] }
  9. IVIG: CONTROVERSIAL. Theoretical: blocks FasL-mediated keratinocyte apoptosis. Evidence: MIXED. Some studies show benefit, others show harm (renal failure, thrombosis, TRALI). Current consensus: NOT routine. May be considered for high-SCORTEN TEN in specialist centres. Dose: 1 g/kg/day for 3 days (if used). COCHRANE review: insufficient evidence for routine use.[2] }
  10. Corticosteroids: NOT recommended for SJS/TEN. Evidence: do NOT improve mortality, may INCREASE infection and mortality (especially TEN). EXCEPTION: may be considered SHORT course for EARLY SJS (before extensive necrosis) in some centres — controversial. AVOID in established TEN (high infection risk). DRESS: corticosteroids ARE used (prednisolone 1 mg/kg, taper over 6-8 weeks) — DRESS is steroid-responsive.[2] }
  11. DRESS management: (1) STOP culprit drug. (2) Corticosteroids: prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day (response usually within 24-48h). (3) Topical steroids for skin. (4) Monitor organ function (liver, kidney, cardiac — myocarditis is fatal). (5) Watch for HHV-6 reactivation (flare after initial improvement). (6) SLOW steroid taper over 6-8 weeks (premature taper → relapse). (7) Consider ciclosporin or other immunosuppressants if steroid-resistant. (8) AVOID re-challenge (can be fatal).[5] }
  12. DRESS has a LONG course. Unlike SJS/TEN (acute, resolves in weeks), DRESS can: (1) Last MONTHS (viral reactivation, immune dysregulation). (2) FLARE after initial improvement (HHV-6 reactivation at 2-3 weeks). (3) Reactivate MONTHS after stopping drug (autoimmune-like phase — thyroiditis, diabetes, SLE). (4) Cause autoimmune disease long-term. Patients need LONG-TERM follow-up (endocrine, rheumatology).[5] }
  13. RegiSCAR score for DRESS (diagnostic — not mortality). 7 criteria: (1) Hospitalisation. (2) Reaction suspected drug-related. (3) Acute rash. (4) Fever >38°C. (5) Enlarged lymph nodes. (6) At least 1 internal organ involved. (7) Blood count abnormalities (eosinophils >400, platelets <120, atypical lymphocytes). Score: ≥4 = definite DRESS. Sensitivity ~90%, specificity ~90%.[5] }
  14. Transfer to specialist centre for TEN. Best outcomes in specialist burn or dermatology units (expertise in skin care, infection control, nutritional support). Indications for transfer: TEN (any BSA), SCORTEN ≥3, extensive mucosal involvement, no local expertise. Transfer EARLY (before extensive skin loss) — outcome better with early specialist care.[2] }

Red flags

Critical SJS/TEN/DRESS red flags

  • Airway involvement (stridor, oral mucosa, tracheobronchial) → anticipate difficult intubation, mucosal bleeding.[1] }
  • SCORTEN ≥3 → mortality >35%, transfer to specialist burn/dermatology unit.[7] }
  • Ocular involvement → ophthalmology within 24h, risk of blindness.[3] }
  • Hepatic dysfunction → poor prognostic sign, common in DRESS.[5] }
  • Neutropenia/agranulocytosis in DRESS → high mortality, infection risk.[5] }
  • Myocarditis in DRESS → fatal, suspect if: chest pain, troponin rise, ECG changes, echo dysfunction.[5] }
  • Hypovolaemic shock in TEN → fluid resuscitation (2-4 mL/kg/%BSA, less than burn).[1] }
  • Sepsis → leading cause of death, surveillance cultures, treat promptly.[4] }

Prognosis

Long-term sequelae of SJS/TEN (Zhang 2021)

Cohort study. Long-term complications affect up to 70% of survivors:

  • Ocular: dry eye, symblepharon, corneal scarring, blindness (3-10%)
  • Skin: dyspigmentation (post-inflammatory), nail dystrophy, chronic pruritus, new melanocytic naevi
  • Mucosal: oral synechiae, vaginal stenosis, urethral stricture, phimosis
  • Respiratory: bronchiolitis obliterans, chronic bronchitis, tracheal stenosis
  • Psychological: PTSD, depression, anxiety (survivors of severe acute illness)
  • Reproductive: sexual dysfunction (genital scarring) [1]

Mortality best predicted by SCORTEN (72h) and ABCD-10.

[1]

AGEP — Acute Generalised Exanthematous Pustulosis

AGEP is the fourth member of the SCAR family and a high-yield discriminator in any exam stem describing hundreds of non-follicular, sterile, subcorneal pustules erupting on erythematous skin within hours-to-days of a drug. It is self-limiting once the trigger is withdrawn (resolves in <15 days with superficial desquamation) and mortality is low (<5%), but it can mimic pustular psoriasis and is the prototype drug-induced neutrophilic pustulosis.[21] }

Mechanism of AGEP

AGEP is a T-cell mediated neutrophilic pustulosis, not a true infection. Drug-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells infiltrate the epidermis and release CXCL8/IL-8, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IFN-γ. IL-8 recruits neutrophils, GM-CSF delays their apoptosis — the result is massive subcorneal neutrophil aggregation → sterile pustules. The blister fluid is sterile on culture (a key diagnostic point: pus without a pathogen). Onset is fast: <4 days after drug exposure (much shorter than SJS/TEN or DRESS). Resolution follows superficial desquamation once the drug is stopped.[21] }

AGEP vs SJS/TEN vs DRESS vs generalised pustular psoriasis

FeatureAGEPSJS/TENDRESSGeneralised pustular psoriasis
LesionHundreds of small non-follicular sterile pustules on erythemaTarget lesions, bullae, sheet-like detachmentMorbilliform maculopapular, facial oedema, later desquamationSheets of pustules on plaques of psoriasis
Onset after drug<4 days (fast)1-4 weeks2-8 weeksNot drug-related (IL-36RN/CARD14 mutation)
MucosaUsually spared (atypical: only 1 site)Always, ≥2 sitesVariable, mildOften
FeverYes (≥38°C, often ≥39°C)YesYes (38-40°C)Yes
Eosinophilia / atypical lymphsMild eosinophilia possibleNoHallmark eosinophilia + atypical lymphsNo
Blister fluidSterile pus (neutrophils)Sterile (necrotic epidermis)Not a blistering disorderSterile pus
HistologySubcorneal pustule, eosinophils, no full-thickness necrosisFull-thickness keratinocyte necrosis, sparse infiltrateLymphocytic interface dermatitis, eosinophils, necrotic keratinocytesSpongiform pustule of Kogoj
NikolskyNegativePositiveNegativeNegative
BSA detachmentNone (pustules only)SJS <10% / overlap 10-30% / TEN >30%None (exfoliation late)None
Mortality<5%~10-30%~5-10%Up to 20%
TreatmentStop drug + supportive. Topical steroids. Steroids if severeStop drug + burn-unit supportive careStop drug + systemic steroids (1 mg/kg)Anti-IL-36 (spesolimab), anti-TNF, retinoids
[1]

Management of AGEP in ICU

  1. STOP the culprit drug. Classic triggers: aminopenicillins (amoxicillin/ampicillin, >50% of cases), pristinamycin (France), macrolides (pristinamycin, spiramycin), quinolones, hydroxychloroquine, terbinafine, diltiazem, sulphonamides. Withdraw ALL non-essential drugs
  2. Confirm sterility — unroof a pustule, send Gram stain and culture (bacterial AND viral — rule out disseminated herpes/varicella). Pustules are sterile in true AGEP
  3. Skin biopsy — subcorneal pustule with neutrophils ± eosinophils, spongiosis, no full-thickness necrosis
  4. Supportive care — antipyretics, fluid balance (skin barrier disrupted by extensive pustules), emollients. Reverse isolation not usually required (much less disruptive than TEN)
  5. Topical corticosteroid (e.g. clobetasol 0.05% to active areas) for symptomatic control
  6. Systemic corticosteroid only if severe / extensive / systemic toxicity — prednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day, short taper (5-10 days). Most cases resolve without steroids
  7. Watch for superimposed sepsis — the ruptured pustules leave a denuded skin barrier; staphylococcal and gram-negative bacteraemia described. Treat confirmed infection promptly, never prophylactic
  8. Expect resolution in 1-2 weeks with superficial brawny desquamation — reassure the patient. Explain the diagnosis and warn against future re-exposure to the culprit drug (carry an alert card)
[1]

AGEP red flags / traps

  • Pustules without a drug history → reconsider pustular psoriasis (generalised pustular psoriasis von Zumbusch, IL-36RN mutation), subcorneal pustular dermatosis (Sneddon-Wilkinson), IgA pemphigus. Biopsy and immunofluorescence mandatory
  • Sterile fluid but febrile and septic-looking → still cultures the pustule; AGEP itself causes fever/leukocytosis that mimics sepsis. Stop antibiotics only AFTER cultures confirm sterility AND drug history fits
  • Mucosal involvement >1 site or sheet-like detachment → NOT AGEP; reconsider SJS/TEN. The two can co-exist (SJS/AGEP overlap reported with lamotrigine, sulphonamides)
  • Calcium-channel-blocker- or hydroxychloroquine-induced pustulosis → look for underlying autoimmune disease (these drugs treat SLE/RA, which themselves predispose to neutrophilic dermatoses)
  • Persistent/worsening after drug withdrawal >7 days → not AGEP. Re-biopsy for psoriasis, pemphigus (subcorneal pustular dermatosis type), Sneddon-Wilkinson
[1]

Pharmacogenomics — HLA screening (high-yield exam topic)

HLA associations in SCAR

SJS/TEN and DRESS are strongly HLA-associated. Pharmacogenetic screening of high-risk populations BEFORE prescribing prevents disease — this is one of the great success stories of precision medicine. Key associations to memorise:[24] } [19] } [20] }

  • HLA-B*15:02 ↔ carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin (Han Chinese, Thai, Southeast Asian, South Asian). Mandatory pre-prescription screen in many national formularies (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Thailand, FDA black-box for carbamazepine)
  • HLA-B*58:01 ↔ allopurinol (Han Chinese, Korean, Thai, Vietnamese). Highest single-gene risk ratio in dermatology. Pre-screen before starting allopurinol in these populations
  • HLA-B*57:01 ↔ abacavir (universal screen — all patients, all populations)
  • HLA-A*31:01 ↔ carbamazepine (Northern European, Japanese)
  • HLA-B*73:01 ↔ allopurinol (European)
  • HLA-A*02:01 ↔ lamotrigine (European)
  • HLA-Cw*04:01 / HLA-B*15:13 ↔ anti-tuberculosis drugs (Vietnamese) — particularly for the INTERMAC/maculopapular phenotype and TEN overlap
  • HLA-DQB1*06:01 / HLA-DRB1*16:02 ↔ DRESS (co-trimoxazole in HIV, carbamazepine) — weaker associations
  • HLA-B*59:01 ↔ allopurinol-DRESS

Remember the drug-gene-population triad: the same gene → different drug risk in different populations (founder effect).

[1]

HLA-allele × drug × population × screen-recommendation

HLA alleleCulprit drugRisk populationScreening recommendation
HLA-B*57:01AbacavirAllUniversal screen (any population) before starting abacavir
HLA-B*15:02Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoinHan Chinese, Thai, SE Asian, South AsianScreen before starting carbamazepine; avoid if positive
HLA-B*58:01AllopurinolHan Chinese, Korean, Thai, VietnameseScreen before starting allopurinol (esp. CKD/low starting dose does not eliminate risk)
HLA-A*31:01CarbamazepineNorthern European, JapaneseConsider screen (Japanese guideline)
HLA-B*73:01AllopurinolEuropeanConsider
HLA-A*02:01LamotrigineEuropeanResearch / not routine
HLA-B*15:13, HLA-Cw*04:01Anti-TB drugs (rifampicin, isoniazid)Vietnamese / SE AsianConsider in SE Asian starting anti-TB
HLA-B*59:01Allopurinol (DRESS phenotype)JapaneseConsider
[1]

Test performance of pre-prescription HLA screening

[1]

Chung 2004 — HLA-B*1502 marks carbamazepine-induced SJS

Landmark case-control study in Han Chinese (Taiwan): 100% of 44 patients with carbamazepine-induced SJS carried HLA-B*1502 vs ~8% of carbamazepine-tolerant controls (OR >2500). The strongest gene-drug association in dermatology. Triggered the FDA black-box warning and a national pre-prescription screening programme in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Thailand that has demonstrably reduced carbamazepine-SJS incidence — proof that pharmacogenomic prevention of SCAR is feasible at population scale.[24] }

Chang/Chung 2020 — Pharmacogenetic testing for prevention of SCAR

Narrative review. Synthesises the case for pre-prescription HLA screening for abacavir (HLA-B*57:01, universal), carbamazepine (HLA-B*15:02, Asian), allopurinol (HLA-B*58:01, Asian). Conclusion: screening is cost-effective when the allele frequency in the target population is >1% and the gene-drug association is strong (OR >10). Remaining gap: implementing screening in low-resource settings and extending panels to additional high-risk genes (HLA-A*31:01, HLA-B*73:01).[19] }

Evidence on specific therapies in SJS/TEN

ICU management pathway for TEN: stop culprit drug, SCORTEN, burns-style fluid and wound care, airway and ocular protection, infection surveillance, consider immunomodulation with specialist input, burn-unit transfer
FigureTEN ICU management — stop the culprit first, score SCORTEN, support like a major burn (fluids, nutrition, sterile wound care, ocular/urogenital protection), and transfer early to a burns or specialised centre.

Corticosteroid / IVIG / ciclosporin / etanercept / thalidomide / plasma exchange across SCAR

TherapySJS/TEN — efficacySJS/TEN — safetyDRESSAGEP
Withdraw culprit drug✓✓✓ single most importantn/a✓✓✓ mandatory✓✓✓ mandatory
Systemic corticosteroid✗ Not recommended in established TEN (↑infection, ↑mortality); debated short course in early SJS↑infection risk✓✓ Prednisolone 1 mg/kg, taper 6-8 wkReserve for severe/extensive
IVIG⚠ Controversial; mixed trials; not routine. May use 1 g/kg × 3d in specialist centreRenal failure, thrombosis, TRALILimited evidence; case series onlyNot used
CiclosporinPromising: Lee 2017 retrospective showed ↓mortality vs IVIGImmunosuppression, nephrotoxicity, hypertensionLimited evidenceNot used
Etanercept (anti-TNF)Phase-II/observational signals (Paradisi 2014); faster re-epithelialisation. Not standardInfection, TB reactivationNot usedNot used
Thalidomide✗✗ HARMFUL (Wolkenstein 1998: ↑mortality, terminated early)Teratogenic, neuropathyNot usedNot used
Plasma exchangeAnecdotal; some centres add in refractory high-SCORTENLine/sepsis/bleeding riskNot usedNot used
Anti-IL-36 / ciclosporin / NFKB-targetedResearch——Research
[1]

Wolkenstein 1998 — Thalidomide INCREASED mortality in TEN (Lancet)

Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial, n=22. Thalidomide was hypothesised to block TNF-α-mediated keratinocyte apoptosis. Result: mortality 10/12 (83%) with thalidomide vs 3/10 (30%) placebo — trial terminated early for harm. Thalidomide paradoxically INCREASED TNF-α in TEN patients. Take-home: never give thalidomide in TEN, and never assume a biologically plausible therapy is safe without controlled evidence. A canonical example of harm from a logical-sounding treatment.[25] }

Lee 2017 — Ciclosporin reduced mortality vs IVIG (Singapore nationwide cohort)

Retrospective nationwide cohort of 105 SJS/TEN/overlap patients. Ciclosporin (n=29) vs IVIG (n=76). Standardised mortality ratio vs SCORTEN-predicted: ciclosporin 0.42 (i.e. observed mortality LOWER than predicted) vs IVIG 1.18 (observed mortality HIGHER than predicted). Ciclosporin group had less progression of BSA detachment and faster re-epithelialisation. Caveats: retrospective, non-randomised, single-centre cohort. Supports ciclosporin as a leading investigational therapy and the relative fall from favour of IVIG.[12] }

Kirchhof 2014 — IVIG vs cyclosporine retrospective (Canada)

Single-centre retrospective review comparing IVIG-treated (n=16) vs cyclosporine-treated (n=12) SJS/TEN patients. No significant difference in mortality (IVIG 38% vs ciclosporin 8%, p=0.21 — trend favouring ciclosporin, underpowered). Both treatments had comparable safety profiles in this cohort. Conclusion: ciclosporin is a reasonable alternative to IVIG; prospective randomised trial needed (still not done).[26] }

Aihara/Aoyama 2015 — IVIG added to corticosteroid in SJS/TEN (Japan)

Multicentre randomised controlled trial, n=110, SJS/TEN patients already on systemic corticosteroid. Addition of IVIG (1 g/kg/day × 3 days) vs no IVIG. Primary outcome: no significant difference in 4-week mortality or Vanderbilt wound-healing score. Modest signal favouring IVIG only in SJS (not TEN) subgroup. Conclusion: IVIG on top of steroids does NOT improve outcomes — further weakens the routine-IVIG case.[14] }

Roujeau/Bastuji-Garin 2011 — Systematic review of SJS/TEN treatments

Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety. Comprehensive systematic review of every reported treatment (corticosteroids, IVIG, ciclosporin, anti-TNF, plasma exchange, thalidomide, N-acetylcysteine). Conclusion: NO therapy has level-1 evidence of benefit. Withdrawal of the culprit drug and expert supportive/burn-unit care remain the only proven interventions. Calls for prospective randomised trials (still largely unanswered a decade later).[8] }

Creamer 2016 — UK national guidelines for SJS/TEN in adults

Multidisciplinary consensus (dermatology, burns, ICU, ophthalmology, maxillofacial). Recommendations: (1) immediate drug withdrawal, (2) early senior review, (3) transfer to ICU/burns centre if >10% BSA or airway/mucosal involvement, (4) fluid management using <burn formula (2-4 mL/kg/%BSA), (5) early nutritional support (NG within 24-48 h), (6) daily ophthalmology review with topical steroid + lubricant, amniotic membrane within 5 days for ocular involvement, (7) skin: conservative debridement only, non-adherent silicone dressings, (8) do NOT use prophylactic antibiotics, treat confirmed infection. Specific immunomodulatory therapy is left to specialist discretion pending better evidence.[13] }

Ingen-Housz-Oro 2025 — French TOXIBUL national protocol for epidermal necrolysis

Multicentre recommendations from the French National Reference Centre for Toxic Bullous Diseases (TOXIBUL). Reaffirms: (1) early withdrawal of all suspected drugs, (2) ABCD-10 ≥2 = poor prognosis → transfer to reference centre, (3) intensive supportive care modelled on severe burns, (4) systematic ophthalmology review within 24 h and amniotic membrane transplantation for any ocular involvement <5 days from onset, (5) cautious intubation with video laryngoscopy and smaller ETT given mucosal fragility, (6) avoid corticosteroid monotherapy in established TEN, (7) ciclosporin considered in select patients under protocol.[15] }

Montmeat/de Prost 2026 — Ventilator-associated pneumonia in epidermal necrolysis (ICU)

Retrospective multicentre ICU cohort of mechanically ventilated epidermal necrolysis patients. VAP incidence was high (~30-40% of intubated TEN patients), driven by mucosal sloughing of the tracheobronchial tree impairing mucociliary clearance, prolonged sedation, and immunosuppression from systemic therapy. Late-onset VAP and Pseudomonas aeruginosa predominated. Practice point: prefer oral over nasal intubation (nasal mucosa sloughs and bleeds), use subglottic secretion drainage, early enteral nutrition, and de-escalate antibiotics rapidly after VAP treatment to limit superinfection in an already immunocompromised host.[16] }

Shay/Tseng 2010 — Sutureless amniotic membrane transplantation for acute TEN ocular disease

Case series. Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) delivered as sutureless PROKERA® devices within 5 days of onset of ocular TEN substantially reduced symblepharon, corneal vascularisation and visual loss at 6 months compared with historical controls managed with topical therapy alone. Time-critical — AMT after day 5 had markedly reduced benefit. Supports the Creamer/TOXIBUL recommendation for early ophthalmology referral and AMT in any TEN patient with ocular involvement.[17] } [18] }

Guegan/Bastuji-Garin 2006 — SCORTEN performance across first five days

Evaluated SCORTEN at days 0, 1, 3, 5 of hospitalisation. SCORTEN at admission under-predicts mortality in patients who progress rapidly; SCORTEN at day 3 has the best discrimination. Recommends calculating SCORTEN on admission AND on day 3 (this is the source of the "two SCORTENs" rule). Patients whose day-3 SCORTEN has risen >2 points from baseline have particularly poor prognosis.[9] }

Bouvresse/Roujeau 2012 — Overlap cases (TEN/DRESS/AGEP) exist

Reviews the existence of overlapping SCAR phenotypes: AGEP-SJS overlap (lamotrigine, sulphonamides), DRESS-SJS overlap (minocycline, diltiazem, carbamazepine, phenytoin) presenting as DRESS that evolves into TEN after several days. Practical implication: diagnose the dominant phenotype, withdraw all suspected drugs, and treat to the more severe end of the spectrum (i.e. if DRESS-TEN overlap, treat as TEN).[11] }

Pathophysiology — deeper detail

Granulysin — the key mediator of TEN (Chung 2008)

Chung et al. (Nature Medicine 2008) used blister fluid proteomics to show that granulysin (a 15 kD cationic cytotoxic protein released by CD8+ T cells and NK cells) is present at concentrations 2- to 4-fold higher than perforin/granzyme B and FasL in TEN blisters, and is the only mediator able to cause keratinocyte necrosis at concentrations found in vivo. Injecting granulysin into mouse skin reproduces TEN-like necrosis. This is why anti-Fas and IVIG (anti-FasL) trials were disappointing — the dominant effector was upstream of FasL. Therapeutic implication: granulysin-targeted therapies (e.g. anti-granulysin antibodies) are an active research frontier.[27] } [30] }

Why do corticosteroids help DRESS but hurt TEN?

The two diseases have opposite immunological architectures. DRESS is a predominantly TH2/eosinophilic cytokine storm (IL-5, IL-13, eotaxin) with bystander organ inflammation — exquisitely corticosteroid-sensitive. TEN is a predominantly CD8+ T cell / granulysin-driven epidermolysis in which the keratinocyte has already committed to necrosis by the time of presentation — corticosteroids arrive too late to abort the apoptosis and instead remove the only brake on secondary infection, the macrophage/neutrophil compartment. Hence the paradox: same drug class, opposite effect. Also explains why ciclosporin (blocks T-cell activation upstream of granulysin release) is mechanistically more attractive in TEN than corticosteroids.[29] }

DRESS — extended clinical content

HHV-6 reactivation — the defining feature of DIHS

The "D" in DIHS (Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome) refers to the biphasic course driven by herpesvirus reactivation. Step 1: drug exposure → T-cell sensitisation → cytokine storm and the initial rash/fever/eosinophilia. Step 2 (2-3 weeks in): HHV-6 (and HHV-7, CMV, EBV) reactivation → clinical flare with fever, lymphadenopathy, atypical lymphocytes and worsening hepatitis. HHV-6 IgG titre rises 4-fold or HHV-6 DNA detected in serum is a Shiohara diagnostic criterion for DIHS (stricter than RegiSCAR). Practical implication: a patient with DRESS who flares after initial response is NOT necessarily re-exposed to a drug — it is viral reactivation. Do NOT blindly increase steroids; check viral PCR and consider antiviral only if CMV-driven disease is severe.[10] } [28] }

DRESS — organ involvement frequency

[1]

DRESS work-up and steroid taper (UK/Japanese consensus)

  1. Confirm diagnosis — RegiSCAR score ≥4 (definite DRESS); Japanese DIHS criteria include HHV-6 serology
  2. STOP culprit drug AND structurally related drugs (cross-reactivity: aromatic anticonvulsants share a common arene-oxide metabolite — phenytoin ↔ carbamazepine ↔ phenobarbital — avoid all three; sulphonamides cross-react broadly)
  3. Screen for organ involvement on day 0: FBC + differential, LFTs, creatinine/eGFR, CRP, troponin, ECG, echo, urinalysis, CXR. Consider skin biopsy (lymphocytic interface dermatitis, eosinophils, necrotic keratinocytes)
  4. Check baseline viral serology: HHV-6 IgG titre, CMV, EBV (to detect later reactivation by titre rise)
  5. Systemic corticosteroid — prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day (max 60-80 mg). Equivalent methylprednisolone 0.8 mg/kg/day if IV needed. Expect response within 24-72 h (fever and rash improve first)
  6. If refractory or steroid-dependent — ciclosporin 3-5 mg/kg/day (especially for DRESS with eosinophilic myocarditis or hepatitis), or mycophenolate, or IVIG. Consider JAK-inhibitor / anti-IL-5 in specialist centres
  7. Monitor daily: LFTs, creatinine, eosinophil count, CRP, temperature. Weekly troponin/echo if cardiac involvement
  8. Taper SLOWLY — prednisolone 1 mg/kg for 2-4 weeks, then reduce by 5-10 mg every 1-2 weeks. Total taper 6-8 weeks minimum; up to 3-6 months for severe/HHV-6-positive DRESS. Premature taper → relapse
  9. Watch for autoimmune phase at 2-6 months: type 1 diabetes (check HbA1c/fasting glucose at 3 months), autoimmune thyroiditis (TSH at 3 and 6 months), autoimmune haemolysis, SLE-like syndrome, Guillain-Barré. Counsel patient
  10. NEVER re-challenge — re-exposure can be fatal. Document culprit drug on the patient's chart, alert card, and medicalert jewellery
[1]

Ophthalmology staged pathway in SJS/TEN

  1. Day 0 (any ocular sign) — eyelid oedema, conjunctival hyperaemia, chemosis, discharge, pseudomembrane, corneal epithelial defect → urgent ophthalmology review (<24 h)
  2. Day 0-2 — slit-lamp exam; assess for pseudomembranes, symblepharon, fornix shortening, corneal erosion
  3. Topical therapy — preservative-free lubricant hourly, prednisolone acetate 1% q1-2h while active inflammation, antibiotic prophylaxis (chloramphenicol 0.5% qid or ofloxacin 0.3% qid), cycloplegia for comfort
  4. Fornix sweep / symblepharon lysis — daily by ophthalmology; a glass rod or moistened swab to break early synechiae; consider amniotic membrane as PROKERA® or sutured graft within 5 days
  5. Amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) — within 5 days for any ocular involvement beyond mild conjunctivitis; reduces symblepharon, corneal ulceration and blindness. Sutureless PROKERA® preferred for ease
  6. Daily review by ophthalmology until epithelialisation complete; then weekly for 6 weeks; long-term follow-up for chronic ocular sequelae (dry eye, limbal stem cell deficiency)
  7. Late sequelae management — punctal occlusion, scleral lenses, mucous membrane grafting, keratoprosthesis in end-stage disease
[1]

Airway and ventilatory management of TEN with tracheobronchial involvement

  1. Identify airway involvement early — hoarseness, dysphonia, stridor, productive cough with mucosal shreds, hypoxia, wheeze. Tracheobronchial TEN → sloughing casts that obstruct the airway, ARDS, pneumothorax
  2. ANTICIPATE the difficult airway: mucosal bleeding on laryngoscopy, friable lips/tongue, oedema, limited mouth opening, possible anaphylactoid reaction to induction agents if drug still circulating
  3. Pre-oxygenate, position head-up, have two senior operators + surgical airway tray ready
  4. Prefer ORAL video laryngoscopy with a SMALLER ETT (e.g. 6.0-6.5 mm in adult) — the tracheal mucosa is inflamed and a tight ETT causes ischaemia and later tracheal stenosis; avoid nasal intubation (nasal mucosa sloughs and bleeds)
  5. Use a soft, low-pressure, low-pressure-cuff ETT, secure carefully (avoid circumferential ties around denuded skin — use a holder). Padding under the ETT at lip/cheek with non-adherent dressing
  6. Ventilation strategy: lung-protective (Vt 6 mL/kg PBW, plateau pressure <30 cmH₂O, PEEP individualised — high PEEP may worsen pneumothorax risk if alveolar involvement). Consider HFOV or prone ventilation if refractory hypoxia / ARDS
  7. Airway toilet is HIGH-RISK — mucosal casts plug the ETT; use gentle saline instillation, soft suction catheter; have a replacement ETT at bedside at all times. Subglottic secretion drainage device preferred
  8. Sedation/analgesia: fentanyl + propofol/midazolam infusions; mucosal pain is severe — multimodal with paracetamol, ketamine bolus/infusion, gabapentin, opioid PCA. Avoid NSAIDs (potential ongoing drug trigger; renal/platelet effects)
  9. Tracheostomy: only if prolonged ventilation (>10-14 days). Surgical technique, careful haemostasis of friable tracheal mucosa, stoma care with non-adherent dressings
  10. Extubation criteria: re-epithelialisation of oropharyngeal mucosa on bronchoscopy, minimal secretions, adequate cuff leak, low FiO₂, successful spontaneous breathing trial. Anticipate post-extubation stridor from laryngeal oedema — consider dexamethasone 4 mg q6h × 48 h pre-extubation (controversial in established TEN, but a single short course around extubation is reasonable)
[1]

Extended clinical pearls (15-29): deeper layers

SCAR pearls beyond the basics — exam-grade depth

  1. SCORTEN vs ABCD-10. SCORTEN (Bastuji-Garin 2000) is the original 7-variable score and is still the most widely used; ABCD-10 (2018) is the newer 10-point score adding age and known/unknown culprit drug. ABCD-10 has marginally better discrimination (AUC 0.83 vs 0.78). Limitation of both: they were derived in Burn Unit populations and under-predict mortality in pure-ICU ventilated TEN. Calculate BOTH. A rising SCORTEN between admission and day 3 is a particularly ominous sign.[9] }
  2. Calculate SCORTEN at admission AND at 72 h. Guegan/Bastuji-Garin (2006) showed day-3 SCORTEN is more accurate because the disease is still progressing at admission and several variables (urea, bicarbonate, glucose, BSA detached) evolve. Day-3 re-scoring changes triage in ~15% of cases.[9] }
  3. TEN is a DRUG-detachment disease, not a burn. The keratinocyte in TEN has been triggered to undergo apoptosis by granulysin/perforin/granzyme/FasL (Chung 2008, Nature Medicine) — by the time you see skin loss the cell is irreversibly committed. This is why late corticosteroids and IVIG are disappointing: you cannot rescue a cell that has already executed apoptosis. By contrast, withdrawal of the culprit drug is effective because it stops further keratinocyte triggering.[27] }
  4. The "two-hit" model of DRESS. Drug → T-cell sensitisation (hit 1); then HHV-6/CMV reactivation 2-3 weeks later (hit 2) → clinical flare. This explains the characteristic biphasic course, why patients deteriorate AFTER stopping the drug, and why relapses occur on tapering steroids. Practical implication: a DRESS patient who flares on steroid taper may have HHV-6 reactivation, not drug re-exposure — check HHV-6 PCR and consider a temporary antiviral + low-dose steroid rescue before escalating.[10] }
  5. Eosinophilic myocarditis in DRESS is a killer. Routine troponin and ECG on day 0 of every DRESS admission, and repeat weekly. Eosinophilic myocarditis can present with non-specific chest pain, sinus tachycardia, or silent troponin rise — easily missed in a patient who is systemically unwell. Echo for reduced EF / regional wall motion / apical thrombus. Treat with high-dose corticosteroid (methylprednisolone 1 g/day × 3 days then 1 mg/kg prednisolone) ± ciclosporin; consider extracorporeal support in fulminant cases. Mortality 30-50% if untreated.[5] }
  6. The auto-immune phase of DRESS months later. 6-12 months after the acute episode, patients may develop type 1 diabetes (often with DKA at onset — measure HbA1c and fasting glucose at 3 months), autoimmune thyroiditis (check TSH at 3 and 6 months), autoimmune haemolysis, Guillain-Barré, thyroid eye disease, SLE, sarcoidosis, alopecia areata. Counsel every DRESS survivor and arrange endocrine/rheumatology follow-up. Mechanism: persistent immune dysregulation from the initial cytokine storm + viral reactivation breaking self-tolerance.[10] }
  7. Cross-reactivity is real and dangerous. Phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, oxcarbazepine share the aromatic anticonvulsant structure — if a patient has SJS/DRESS to one, AVOID ALL. Switch to a non-aromatic (levetiracetam, valproate, topiramate, gabapentin/pregabalin, lamotrigine — note lamotrigine itself is a SJS culprit). Sulphonamides (cotrimoxazole, sulfasalazine, sulphonamide-loop diuretics) cross-react. Re-challenge with a cross-reactive drug can be FATAL. Document the cross-reactive class on the chart.[1] }
  8. Do NOT prescribe prophylactic antibiotics in TEN. Despite extensive skin loss, prophylactic systemic antibiotics increase mortality (Wolkenstein 2000 observational). Strategy: reverse isolation, aseptic technique, surveillance cultures every 2-3 days, treat ONLY confirmed infection with narrow-spectrum targeted therapy. The exception is antiseptic washes (e.g. chlorhexidine 0.05% to intact skin, silver sulfadiazine to denuded areas in some centres — though silver sulfadiazine carries a sulphonamide cross-reactivity warning).[4] }
  9. IVIG in SJS/TEN: meta-analyses disagree. Cochrane and Hong 2015 meta-analyses found no mortality benefit; a 2020 systematic review suggested benefit only in pure-SJS (not TEN) at total doses >2 g/kg. Risks: renal failure (sucrose-containing preparations), thrombosis, TRALI, aseptic meningitis, haemolysis. If IVIG is used, total dose ≤2 g/kg (i.e. 1 g/kg × 2 days, not 3 days), and renal-function monitoring. The French TOXIBUL 2025 protocol explicitly does NOT recommend routine IVIG.[15] }
  10. Ciclosporin is the most promising investigational therapy. Lee 2017 nationwide cohort (ciclosporin SMR 0.42 vs IVIG SMR 1.18) and Kirchhof 2014 retrospective both favour ciclosporin. Mechanistic rationale: ciclosporin blocks calcineurin → inhibits T-cell activation → reduces granulysin release BEFORE keratinocyte apoptosis is committed. Dose 3-5 mg/kg/day, trough 100-200 ng/mL, for 7-14 days then taper. Caveats: nephrotoxicity (monitor creatinine), hypertension, immunosuppression. Awaiting a definitive RCT (the multi-centre EuSCAR-trial is in development).[12] }
  11. Mycophenolate or methotrexate as steroid-sparing in DRESS. For DRESS with hepatitis or myocarditis that flares on steroid taper, mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day or methotrexate 15-25 mg/week are effective steroid-sparing agents. Anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab, benralizumab) has been used in case series of refractory eosinophilic organ disease. JAK-inhibitors (baricitinib, ruxolitinib) are an emerging off-label option in severe refractory DRESS.[28] }
  12. Risk of squamous cell carcinoma after chronic TEN ocular sequelae. Long-term follow-up of TEN survivors with limbal stem cell deficiency and chronic inflammation shows a 5-10× increased risk of ocular surface SCC. Any chronic red eye, vascularisation or mass in a TEN survivor warrants urgent ophthalmology review.[1] }
  13. Mycoplasma pneumoniae SJS (Mycoplasma-induced rash and mucositis, MIRM) is different. Predominantly adolescents/young adults, prominent mucositis (oral, ocular, urogenital) with MINIMAL or no skin involvement (atypical target lesions only), preceded by respiratory infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Drug cause is absent. Treatment: supportive ± macrolide for the infection. Corticosteroids more often used in MIRM than in classic SJS (less infection risk, prominent inflammatory mucositis). Prognosis better than classic SJS (mortality <5%).[1] }
  14. Infectious triggers of SJS/TEN beyond drugs. Mycoplasma pneumoniae (especially in children — MIRM), HSV (especially recurrent erythema multiforme major, considered by some a separate entity), dengue (rare, mostly overlap), SARS-CoV-2 (case reports, often with concomitant drug exposure), cytomegalovirus. In any SJS/TEN without an obvious drug, take a careful infectious history and serology.[1] }
  15. Burn-unit vs dermatology-ward vs ICU placement — the debate. Best outcomes are in dedicated burn or dermatology reference (Lyell) centres with multi-disciplinary expertise. Pure-medical ICU placement is suboptimal if it lacks specialist skin-care. Transfer indications: TEN with >10% BSA, SCORTEN/ABCD-10 ≥2, airway/mucosal involvement, no local expertise. Transfer EARLY (within 24-48 h); outcome worsens if transfer delayed until skin loss is extensive.[13] }

Prognostic calculators and follow-up

SCORTEN vs ABCD-10 vs DigestQ in TEN

ScoreYearVariablesMaxDiscrimination (AUC)Comment
SCORTEN2000Age, malignancy, HR, BSA, urea, bicarb, glucose (7)7~0.78-0.83Standard; calculate at 24 h and 72 h
ABCD-102018SCORTEN variables + age (decimalised) + known culprit drug (10)10~0.83-0.88Marginally better; less validated outside Burn Units
DigestQ2019Digestive tract involvement (anorexia, dysphagia, diarrhoea)1n/aIndependent predictor; if positive adds to SCORTEN
Epidermolysis prognostic scoreongoingmulti-domainvariesvariesResearch
[1]

Discharge and long-term follow-up after SCAR

  1. Before discharge — confirm culprit drug and structurally related class; issue written alert card and Medicalert recommendation; document in EHR with allergy flag; notify primary care and pharmacy; arrange dermatology + ophthalmology + relevant subspecialty follow-up
  2. At 2 weeks — wound review (re-epithelialisation, residual erosions), ophthalmology, psychological screen (PTSD/depression common), nutritional status, functional ADL assessment
  3. At 1 month — repeat LFT/renal/eosinophils in DRESS; troponin/echo if cardiac involvement; HIV/hepatitis serology in allopurinol-induced DRESS (these patients often have undiagnosed renal/cardiovascular comorbidity)
  4. At 3 and 6 months — TSH (autoimmune thyroiditis), fasting glucose/HbA1c (T1DM), repeat echo if myocarditis; screen for autoimmune phenomena in DRESS (ANA, anti-dsDNA, complements); sexual function / urogenital sequelae (urology/gynaecology)
  5. At 12 months — formal psychological review, cognitive screen if prolonged ICU/delirium, formal visual assessment, lung function if respiratory involvement
  6. Indefinite — avoid culprit and cross-reactive drugs; pharmacogenetic testing of family members if HLA-associated SCAR (autosomal co-dominant inheritance); genetic counselling
[1]

Special situations

SCAR in special populations

PopulationFeatureAdjustment
PregnancySJS/TEN in pregnancy rare; fetal loss risk if extensive maternal disease. Corticosteroids safe in pregnancy for DRESS. Avoid ciclosporin if possible (1st trimester). Avoid IVIG preparations with high thrombotic riskMultidisciplinary with obstetrics + neonatology
ChildrenSJS/TEN most often Mycoplasma-driven (MIRM). IVIG used more liberally. Lower mortality than adults. Family HLA screening important (HLA-B*15:02 carbamazepine)Pediatric burns unit preferred
ElderlyHigher baseline SCORTEN (age >40), more comorbidity, more polypharmacy (harder to identify culprit), higher mortalityAggressive supportive care; deprescribe
HIVHigh incidence of SJS/TEN and DRESS (sulphonamides — cotrimoxazole for PCP; nevirapine; abacavir — HLA-B*57:01 screen). DRESS often to cotrimoxazole. Reduced dose IVIG if renal impairmentLower threshold for HLA screening; abacavir universal screen
Renal failure / dialysisUrea is a SCORTEN variable — already elevated → over-predict mortality. Adjust drug doses; ciclosporin nephrotoxicity limits use. IVIG volume-load concernUse ABCD-10 alongside SCORTEN
TransplantCalcineurin-inhibitor-induced DRESS/AGEP (rare). Withdrawal of immunosuppression risks rejection. Multidisciplinary with transplant teamSwitch immunosuppression class rather than withdraw
SLE/autoimmuneHydroxychloroquine-AGEP, sulfasalazine-DRESS overlap. Active autoimmune disease itself a confounderBiopsy; involve rheumatology/dermatology
[1]

Diagnostic workflow summary

Bedside diagnostic algorithm for an acutely ill patient with a blistering/pustular drug rash

  1. Is this SJS/TEN, DRESS, AGEP, or overlap? Determine the dominant phenotype by lesion morphology, BSA detached, mucosal involvement, time since drug, fever, eosinophilia
  2. Time since drug start: <4 days → AGEP or acute generalised exanthem; 1-4 weeks → SJS/TEN; 2-8 weeks → DRESS. Late reactivation without drug re-exposure → DRESS viral reactivation
  3. Lesion: hundreds of small pustules → AGEP; target/atypical target + bullae + detachment → SJS/TEN; morbilliform macules + facial oedema + desquamation → DRESS
  4. Mucosa: ≥2 sites → SJS/TEN; 0-1 → AGEP; variable, mild → DRESS
  5. Eosinophilia / atypical lymphs: absent → SJS/TEN; mild → AGEP; hallmark → DRESS
  6. Skin biopsy + direct immunofluorescence (rule out pemphigus, pemphigoid, linear IgA)
  7. Apply diagnostic score: RegiSCAR (DRESS), EuroSCAR-AGEP validation (AGEP), Bastuji-Garin SCORTEN (severity in TEN)
  8. Stop ALL suspected drugs + cross-reactive class — do this BEFORE waiting for biopsy results if SJS/TEN suspected
  9. Stratify severity: SCORTEN + ABCD-10 at 24 h and 72 h; organ involvement screen; airway involvement assessment
  10. Triage: ICU vs burns/dermatology specialist centre vs ward. TEN, airway/mucosal involvement, SCORTEN ≥2-3 → transfer to specialist centre
[1]

Key takeaways

What the examiner wants you to say

  • SJS/TEN: withdraw culprit drug immediately (single most important step); ICU/burns supportive care with <burn fluid formula; early nutrition; daily ophthalmology with amniotic membrane within 5 days; conservative skin care; no prophylactic antibiotics, no thalidomide, no routine corticosteroids, IVIG not routine; consider ciclosporin
  • DRESS: withdraw culprit + cross-reactive class; prednisolone 1 mg/kg, taper over 6-8 weeks; check HHV-6; troponin/echo for myocarditis; long-term autoimmune follow-up
  • AGEP: withdraw culprit; confirm sterile pustules; topical steroids; systemic steroids only if severe; resolution in 1-2 weeks with desquamation
  • Pharmacogenetics: screen HLA-B*57:01 (abacavir, all), HLA-B*15:02 (carbamazepine, Asian), HLA-B*58:01 (allopurinol, Asian)
  • Always: SCORTEN at 24 h AND 72 h; transfer to specialist centre if SCORTEN/ABCD-10 ≥2; document culprit drug and cross-reactive class; arrange long-term follow-up
[1]

References

  1. [1]Zhang S, et al. Amino Acids Enhance Polyubiquitination of Rheb and Its Binding to mTORC1 by Blocking Lysosomal ATXN3 Deubiquitinase Activity Mol Cell, 2020.PMID 33157014
  2. [2]Harr T, French LE. A qualitative exploration of attitudes to walking in the retirement life change BMC Public Health, 2022.PMID 35264126
  3. [3]Chung WH, et al. Hydrothermal impacts on trace element and isotope ocean biogeochemistry Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci, 2016.PMID 29035265
  4. [4]Mockenhaupt M. Adding a protective screw improves hinge's axial and torsional stability in High Tibial Osteotomy Clin Biomech (Bristol), 2020.PMID 32151903
  5. [5]Kardaun SH, et al. Can sand nourishment material affect dune vegetation through nutrient addition? Sci Total Environ, 2020.PMID 32278174
  6. [6]Hsu DY, et al. Intraoperative Complications and Visual Outcomes of Cataract Surgery in Diabetes Mellitus: A Multicenter Database Study Am J Ophthalmol, 2021.PMID 33422465
  7. [7]Yang MS, et al. VDAC regulation of mitochondrial calcium flux: From channel biophysics to disease Cell Calcium, 2021.PMID 33529977
  8. [8]Roujeau JC, Bastuji-Garin S. Systematic review of treatments for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis using the SCORTEN score as a tool for evaluating mortality Ther Adv Drug Saf, 2011.PMID 25083204
  9. [9]Guégan S, Bastuji-Garin S, Poszepczynska-Guigné E, Roujeau JC, Revuz J. Performance of the SCORTEN during the first five days of hospitalization to predict the prognosis of epidermal necrolysis J Invest Dermatol, 2006.PMID 16374461
  10. [10]Kardaun SH, Sidoroff A, Valeyrie-Allanore L, et al. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): an original multisystem adverse drug reaction. Results from the prospective RegiSCAR study Br J Dermatol, 2013.PMID 23855313
  11. [11]Bouvresse S, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Ortonne N, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis, DRESS, AGEP: do overlap cases exist? Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2012.PMID 23009177
  12. [12]Lee HY, Fook-Chong S, Koh HY, Pang SM, Thirumoorthy T. Cyclosporine treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: Retrospective analysis of a cohort treated in a specialized referral center J Am Acad Dermatol, 2017.PMID 27717620
  13. [13]Creamer D, Walsh SA, Dziewulski P, et al. U.K. guidelines for the management of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in adults 2016 Br J Dermatol, 2016.PMID 27317286
  14. [14]Aihara Y, Iwai I, Aihara M, Kobayashi Y, Fujita H, Yamada H, Tohma S, Aoyama Y, SJS/TEN Study Group. Efficacy of additional i.v. immunoglobulin to steroid therapy in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis J Dermatol, 2015.PMID 25982480
  15. [15]Ingen-Housz-Oro S, Haddad C, Baton L, et al.; French National Reference Center for Toxic Bullous Diseases (TOXIBUL). Diagnosing and Managing Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in Adults: Review of Evidence 2017-2023 J Invest Dermatol, 2025.PMID 40019457
  16. [16]Montmeat V, Razzaghi A, Ingen-Housz-Oro S, et al.; Epidermolysis Study Group. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in adult ICU patients with epidermal necrolysis: A retrospective cohort study from the French National Reference Centre Burns, 2026.PMID 41775027
  17. [17]Shay E, Kheirkhah A, Liang L, Sheha H, Gregory DG, Tseng SC. Efficacy and limitation of sutureless amniotic membrane transplantation for acute toxic epidermal necrolysis Cornea, 2010.PMID 20098313
  18. [18]Shay E, Kheirkhah A, Liang L, et al. Amniotic membrane transplantation as a new therapy for the acute ocular manifestations of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis Surv Ophthalmol, 2009.PMID 19699503
  19. [19]Chang CJ, Schlapbach C, Chew AL, Hashim PW, Thakrar R, Hung SI, Chung WH. Pharmacogenetic Testing for Prevention of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Front Pharmacol, 2020.PMID 32714190
  20. [20]Su SC, Hung SI, Fan WL, Chung WH. Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions: The Pharmacogenomics from Research to Clinical Implementation Int J Mol Sci, 2016.PMID 27854302
  21. [21]Sidoroff A, Halevy S, Bavinck JN, Vaillant L, Roujeau JC. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)--a clinical reaction pattern J Cutan Pathol, 2001.PMID 11168761
  22. [22]Sidoroff A, Dunant A, Viboud C, et al. Risk factors for acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)-results of a multinational case-control study (EuroSCAR) Br J Dermatol, 2007.PMID 17854366
  23. [23]Halevy S. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 2009.PMID 19458527
  24. [24]Chung WH, Hung SI, Hong HS, Hsih MS, Yang LC, Ho HC, Wu JY, Chen YT. Medical genetics: a marker for Stevens-Johnson syndrome Nature, 2004.PMID 15057820
  25. [25]Wolkenstein P, Latarjet J, Roujeau JC, et al. Randomised comparison of thalidomide versus placebo in toxic epidermal necrolysis Lancet, 1998.PMID 9843104
  26. [26]Kirchhof MG, Miliszewski MA, Sikora S, Papp A, Dutz JP. Retrospective review of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis treatment comparing intravenous immunoglobulin with cyclosporine J Am Acad Dermatol, 2014.PMID 25087214
  27. [27]Chung WH, Hung SI, Yang JY, Su SC, Huang SP, Wei AL, Chin SI, Wu CC, Chen JZ, Chen XL, Chang CC, Chang YC, Yang CH, Chang LC, Ho HC, Yang CH, Chu NY, Lin TY, Chang TY, Lee KM, Yang CY, Hui RC, Chu CY, Chen CB, Chen WC, Hu CP, Lee WR, Tung YY, Hsiao YL, Dao RL, Chen YT. Granulysin is a key mediator for disseminated keratinocyte death in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis Nat Med, 2008.PMID 19029983
  28. [28]Cacoub P, Musette P, Descamps V, et al. The DRESS syndrome: a literature review Am J Med, 2011.PMID 21592453
  29. [29]Chung WH, Hung SI. Recent advances in the genetics and immunology of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrosis J Dermatol Sci, 2012.PMID 22541332
  30. [30]Su SC, Chung WH. Cytotoxic proteins and therapeutic targets in severe cutaneous adverse reactions Toxins (Basel), 2014.PMID 24394640