Paeds Cases · mental-behavioural-and-psychosomatic
Acute behavioural disturbance and agitation — OSCE communication and management station
Observed structured encounter testing environmental safety, verbal de-escalation as first-line treatment, the least-restrictive ladder, organic-cause exclusion, restraint minimisation and a trauma-informed recovery and debrief.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Station objectives
- Make the environment safe and call for help early in a behavioural emergency. [1] [3]
- Apply verbal de-escalation as the first-line treatment of acute agitation. [5] [1]
- Climb the least-restrictive ladder correctly and justify each step. [1] [4]
- Exclude organic causes before and after sedation. [3] [2]
- Minimise restraint harms and debrief in a trauma-informed way. [6] [5]
Candidate brief
You are the paediatric doctor in the emergency department. You have 8 minutes for Station A (a 14-year-old with autism who is escalating in a noisy department, with his mother present) and 10 minutes for Station B (a deterioration in which he refuses oral medication and the team must decide on the parenteral rung and a restraint decision). Examiners score environmental safety, de-escalation skill, ladder reasoning, organic-cause exclusion, restraint decision-making and the debrief. [1] [3]
Station A — Escalation: de-escalation and organic exclusion
Setup: A 14-year-old with autism is pacing and shouting in a crowded, noisy cubicle. He has not eaten today. His mother is present and distressed. [3] [5]
Expected actions:
- Secure the environment: reduce noise and crowding, open exits, remove hazards, position staff safely, call senior, security and mental-health help early. [1]
- Apply verbal de-escalation: calm single voice, short phrases, respect personal space, identify his wants and feelings, offer choices such as a quieter room, use his communication aids and his mother as a familiar regulator. [5] [1]
- Exclude organic causes in parallel: check capillary glucose because he has not eaten, temperature and oxygen saturation; take collateral from his mother on baseline, triggers, and whether this episode is typical or new. [3] [2]
- Offer oral medication if he engages, citing an oral-first approach grounded in paediatric trial evidence. [4]
Station B — Deterioration: parenteral rung and restraint decision
Setup: He now refuses oral medication and lunges at a nurse. The danger is uncontained. [2] [7]
Expected actions:
- Recognise that the parenteral rung is now appropriate because oral is refused and danger is uncontained; name intramuscular olanzapine or droperidol, with or without midazolam, per local protocol. [2] [7]
- State the mandatory post-dose monitoring: airway, breathing, sedation score, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, heart rate, and ECG if an antipsychotic was given, with reversal and resuscitation available. [2]
- Treat restraint as a last resort: if unavoidable, team-trained, brief, continuously monitored, never solitary, never prone or with neck pressure; document justification, duration and monitoring. [6] [1]
- Once calm, return to exclude organic causes — a calm, sedated child is not an assessed child. [3] [2]
Marking anchors
Clear pass: makes the environment safe first; calls help early; demonstrates structured de-escalation adapted to autism; checks glucose and saturations in parallel; offers oral medication before parenteral; correct ladder reasoning; recognises the parenteral rung is now appropriate; states full post-dose monitoring; treats restraint as a last resort with asphyxia awareness; returns to organic causes once calm; plans a trauma-informed debrief. [1] [4] [5] Borderline: good rapport but ladder reasoning vague, or organic exclusion omitted, or restraint discussed without acknowledging the asphyxia risk. Fail: reaches for restraint or parenteral medication as a first move; omits de-escalation; fails to exclude organic causes; does not monitor after sedation; or does not debrief. [2] [6] [3]
Debrief pearls
- De-escalation is the first-line treatment; restraint is a last resort and a failure to plan. [5] [6]
- Severity drives the ladder; cause drives the treatment — keep both axes in mind. [1] [3]
- Adapt communication and environment for neurodivergent children; restraint reduction begins with that adaptation. [5] [6]
References
- [1]Gerson R Best Practices for Evaluation and Treatment of Agitated Children and Adolescents (BETA) in the Emergency Department: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry. West J Emerg Med, 2019.PMID 30881565
- [2]Hoffmann JA Pharmacologic Management of Acute Agitation in Youth in the Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2021.PMID 34397677
- [3]Foster AA Approach to acute agitation in the pediatric emergency department. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2024.PMID 38299972
- [4]Bourke EM PEAChY-O: Pharmacological Emergency Management of Agitation in Children and Young People: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Medication. Ann Emerg Med, 2025.PMID 39955661
- [5]Klein K Non-pharmacological de-escalation techniques used to manage acute severe behavioural disturbance in children and adolescents presenting to emergency departments: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child, 2026.PMID 41015487
- [6]Perers C Methods and Strategies for Reducing Seclusion and Restraint in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Care. Psychiatr Q, 2022.PMID 33629229
- [7]Bourke EM Acute Severe Behavioral Disturbance Requiring Parenteral Sedation in Pediatric Mental Health Presentations to Emergency Medical Services: A Retrospective Chart Review. Ann Emerg Med, 2023.PMID 37389492