Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Casespain-palliative-and-end-of-life-care

Paeds Cases · pain-palliative-and-end-of-life-care

Hold the goals-of-care conversation for care in the last days of life — OSCE

OSCE communication station for care in the last days of life: open the conversation, explore understanding, make a clear recommendation, address fear of abandonment, and agree a documented plan.

osce communication and shared decision-making
On this page & tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A four-year-old with progressive metastatic solid tumour is now bed-bound, taking only sips, with irregular breathing and increasing periods of unresponsiveness. The family wish to remain at home if symptoms can be controlled.

Candidate brief

You have eight minutes to open a goals-of-care conversation with the family in this scenario. Explore their understanding, hopes and worries; explain the clinical recommendation in plain language; address fear of abandonment; and agree next steps including documentation and support. [1][2]

Key teaching and communication objectives

Start with listening. Ask what the family already understands and what they are most afraid of. Name the clinical situation honestly without jargon. Make a clear recommendation grounded in the child's best interests rather than asking the parents to choose from an unsupported menu. [1]

Explain that limiting non-beneficial life support is not the same as stopping care. Symptom control, presence and dignity intensify. Invite questions, allow silence, and check back for understanding. If disagreement remains, explain second opinion and ethics pathways without threatening abandonment. [1][2]

Close with a concrete plan: who will do what by when, which treatments continue, which are limited, how symptoms will be treated, how siblings will be supported, and when you will meet again. [2]

Marking domains

Suggested marking domains (formative)
  1. Rapport and exploration of understanding
  2. Clear best-interests recommendation
  3. Distinction between limiting life support and withdrawing care
  4. Shared plan and documentation
  5. Family and sibling support / escalation if disagreement
[1]

References

  1. [1]Himelstein BP et al. Pediatric palliative care. N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15103002
  2. [2]McNeilly P et al. The use of syringe drivers: a paediatric perspective. Int J Palliat Nurs, 2004.PMID 15365495
  3. [3]Wee B et al. Interventions for noisy breathing in patients near to death. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008.PMID 18254072
  4. [4]Greenfield K et al. A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis of barriers and facilitators to paediatric symptom management at end of life. Palliat Med, 2020.PMID 32228216