Paeds Cases · child-safety-and-social-paediatrics
Child sexual abuse and assault assessment OSCE — acute adolescent assault and the non-acute normal examination
Observed structured encounter testing tempo recognition, conditional confidentiality, the staged acute assault bundle with its time-limited elements, and the interpretation and communication of a normal ano-genital examination.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Station objectives
- Recognise the acute versus non-acute tempo and prioritise the time-limited elements accordingly. [1]
- State conditional confidentiality with its mandatory-reporting limits before the interview. [1]
- Assemble the acute assault bundle in order, naming agents and time windows for contraception and prophylaxis. [2]
- Interpret and safely communicate a normal ano-genital examination without excluding abuse. [1] [3]
- Discharge the safeguarding, reporting and follow-up duties. [1] [4]
Candidate brief
You are the paediatric registrar in the emergency department. You have 10 minutes for Station A (acute adolescent assault within the forensic window) and 12 minutes for Station B (non-acute prepubertal child with a normal examination and a safeguarding decision). Examiners score tempo recognition, conditional confidentiality, the completeness and order of the bundle, the interpretation of the normal examination, and the safety of the disposition. [1] [2]
Station A — Acute adolescent assault (within the window)
Setup: A fifteen-year-old girl, seen alone, presents six hours after a sexual assault by an unknown assailant in a park. She is post-menarchal, not on contraception, haemodynamically stable, HIV-negative; the assailant's HIV status is unknown but the act was high-risk. [2]
Expected actions:
- Confirm ABCDE stability and analgesia; recognise this as acute and within the forensic window. [1]
- State conditional confidentiality, including mandatory reporting, before the interview. [1]
- Consent the young person as a mature minor, with a trained examiner and chaperone. [1]
- Order the time-limited elements: forensic kit within 72 hours; baseline STI specimens then empiric prophylaxis covering gonorrhoea, chlamydia and trichomoniasis; emergency contraception (levonorgestrel 1.5 mg up to 72 hours, or ulipristal 30 mg up to 120 hours, or copper intrauterine device up to 5 days); HIV post-exposure prophylaxis within 72 hours given the high-risk exposure; hepatitis B vaccination with immunoglobulin if indicated. [2]
- Close with psychological first aid, a mandatory report, a safety plan, and a two-week and two-to-three-month follow-up. [1] [4]
Common errors the examiner will trap: promising secrecy; deferring resuscitation or analgesia for the kit; omitting emergency contraception or HIV post-exposure prophylaxis; forgetting baseline specimens before prophylaxis; and failing to arrange follow-up serology. [2]
Station B — Non-acute child with a normal examination
Setup: A six-year-old girl is referred after a tentative disclosure two months ago that her mother's partner touched her genitals. The ano-genital examination, including the posterior hymenal rim with labial separation and traction, is completely normal. Her mother asks whether the normal examination means "it didn't happen". [1] [3]
Expected actions:
- Recognise the non-acute tempo: no forensic window, no kit; an unhurried, child-paced examination and a single trained forensic interview. [1]
- Explain to the mother, without over-promising, that a normal examination does not exclude abuse, because hymenal tissue heals rapidly, most contact is non-penetrative, and disclosure is often delayed — most confirmed cases have normal or nonspecific findings. [1] [3]
- State that the disclosure and overall context carry the diagnosis, not the examination. [3]
- Make a mandatory child-protection report on reasonable belief of abuse, agree a safety plan so the child does not return to the alleged perpetrator, and refer for trauma-focused therapy. [1]
- Arrange a two-week and a two-to-three-month follow-up that repeats serology where indicated and confirms the safety plan is working. [1] [4]
Common errors the examiner will trap: concluding "no abuse because no findings"; re-interviewing the child; promising confidentiality; over-calling a normal variant as a specific finding; and discharging the child without a safety plan or follow-up. [1] [3]
Marking domains
- Tempo and prioritisation — acute vs non-acute recognised; resuscitation and the time-limited elements in the right order. [1]
- Communication and confidentiality — conditional confidentiality stated; the young person kept central; the normal examination explained without excluding abuse. [1] [3]
- Clinical bundle — contraception, STI prophylaxis and HIV post-exposure prophylaxis with correct agents and windows; baseline specimens before prophylaxis. [2]
- Safeguarding and follow-up — mandatory report, safety plan, therapy referral, and the two-week and two-to-three-month reviews. [1] [4]
References
- [1]Adams JA, Kellogg ND, Farst KJ, Harper NS, Palusci VJ, Frasier LD Updated Guidelines for the Medical Assessment and Care of Children Who May Have Been Sexually Abused. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 2016.PMID 26220352
- [2]Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 2021.PMID 34292926
- [3]Adams JA, Harper K, Knudson S, Revilla J Examination findings in legally confirmed child sexual abuse: it's normal to be normal. Pediatrics, 1994.PMID 8065856
- [4]Gavril AR, Kellogg ND, Nair P Value of follow-up examinations of children and adolescents evaluated for sexual abuse and assault. Pediatrics, 2012.PMID 22291113