Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Casesprofessional-practice-and-evidence

Paeds Cases · professional-practice-and-evidence

Consent, parental responsibility and mature-minor frameworks — OSCE

OSCE station: obtaining parental permission and child assent for a lumbar puncture in a school-age child, managing dissent and disagreement.

osce communication and management station
On this page & tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A 6-year-old with suspected meningitis needs a lumbar puncture; the mother consents, the father phones to refuse, and the child is frightened and pulling away.

Objectives

  1. Confirm who holds parental responsibility and how to weigh conflicting parental views for an urgent decision. [1]
  2. Seek age-appropriate assent and manage dissent in a frightened school-age child. [2] [12]
  3. Disclose material risks, benefits and alternatives in plain language with teach-back. [1]
  4. Apply the emergency principle and escalate appropriately if disagreement threatens the child. [1] [9]

Candidate brief

A 12-minute station. A 6-year-old with suspected meningitis requires a lumbar puncture. The mother present consents. The father phones mid-station and refuses, demanding you wait. The child is tearful and pulling away from the bed. The nurse asks you what the plan is. The child is haemodynamically stable but the team is concerned about delay. [1]

Expected actions

  • Greet the child by name first; acknowledge fear before discussing the procedure with the parent. [12]
  • Confirm the mother's relationship and parental responsibility; do not assume authority from presence alone. [1]
  • Explain the lumbar puncture in child-friendly terms: what, why, what it feels like, and how you will keep them comfortable and still. [2] [12]
  • Use teach-back: ask the parent to restate the purpose and the main risks and alternatives. [1]
  • Seek the child's assent and document behavioural dissent; plan topical anaesthesia, positioning and distraction rather than forcing. [2]
  • Take the father's call: explore his specific concern, offer to involve the senior clinician, and explain the plan and the reason urgency matters. [1] [9]
  • If disagreement persists and delay risks harm, escalate to the consultant, involve ethics or legal services per local policy, and apply the emergency principle where the threshold is met. [1] [9]
  • Document who consented, the capacity and assent findings, the material risks disclosed, the dissent, and the escalation. [1]

Examiner prompts

  • "Father on line two: do not touch my child." → Explore the concern, explain urgency, involve senior. [1] [9]
  • "Will it paralyse her legs?" → Disclose the real material risks honestly without dismissing the fear. [1]
  • "She's crying, just do it quickly." → Reframe: read behavioural dissent, build in preparation and comfort. [2] [12]

Marking foci

  • Identifies parental responsibility and manages conflicting parental authority appropriately. [1]
  • Seeks assent and reads behavioural dissent, not just verbal agreement. [2]
  • Discloses material risks and alternatives with teach-back. [1]
  • Applies emergency principle and escalation pathway when delay risks harm. [1] [9]
  • Documents the consent basis, capacity and assent findings, and dissent. [1]

References

  1. [1]COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 27456514
  2. [2]Katz AL, Webb SA, COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 27456510
  3. [3]Appelbaum PS, Grisso T Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med, 1988.PMID 3200278
  4. [9]Diekema DS Revisiting the best interest standard: uses and misuses. J Clin Ethics, 2011.PMID 21837884
  5. [12]Levetown M, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics Communicating with children and families: from everyday interactions to skill in conveying distressing information. Pediatrics, 2008.PMID 18450887