Paeds Cases · genetics-dysmorphology-and-metabolism
Unusual face and developmental delay — dysmorphology examination OSCE
OSCE on a structured dysmorphology examination plan, anomaly classification, tiered testing and family communication.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Objectives
- Elicit the developmental and family concern. [7]
- Outline a structured, terminology-driven dysmorphology examination. [1]
- Classify findings and plan tiered genetic testing. [3] [9]
- Communicate uncertainty and the plan honestly. [5]
Candidate brief
Twelve-minute station. A caregiver and their 6-month-old infant are present; the referral cites an unusual face and developmental delay. [1]
Expected actions
- Open with a concern-focused developmental and family history. [7]
- Outline observation then systematic head-to-toe examination in standard terms. [1]
- Name the measurements (occipitofrontal circumference and facial distances) and the plan to examine the parents. [1]
- Classify anomalies by mechanism and significance; state the three-or-more-minor-anomalies rule. [3] [5]
- Propose chromosomal microarray as first-tier and exome or genome as the next step, plus an organ-targeted work-up. [9]
Parent actor prompts
- "Everyone says she looks like her father, but she is not doing what her cousin did at this age." [7]
- "Is something wrong with her face? Will she be okay?" [1]
Model communication lines
"I hear your concern, and I take it seriously. I will watch how she plays, examine her carefully from head to toe using clear measurements, and I would like to look at you both as well, because family features matter. My plan is to arrange a first genetic test called a chromosomal microarray, and if needed a more detailed test called exome sequencing. I will explain every result in plain language. Some answers take time, so I will book a definite review and tell you exactly what to watch for in the meantime." [1] [7]
Marking
Pass: structured terminology-driven examination plan with measurements and parental examination; correct anomaly classification and the three-or-more-minor-anomalies rule; microarray as first-tier with exome as next step; honest, plain-language counselling with a booked review. [1] [3] [9] Fail: vague non-standard description; reassurance from a single feature without searching for a pattern; karyotype offered as the default first test; or an open-ended wait with no plan. [5] [7]
References
- [1]Allanson JE, Biesecker LG, Carey JC, Hennekam RC Elements of morphology: introduction. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2009.PMID 19127575
- [3]Hennekam RC, Biesecker LG, Allanson JE, Hall JG, Opitz JM, Temple IK Elements of morphology: general terms for congenital anomalies. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2013.PMID 24124000
- [5]Carey JC, Allanson JE, Hennekam RC, Biesecker LG Standard terminology for phenotypic variations: the elements of morphology project, its current progress, and future directions. Human Mutation, 2012.PMID 22331827
- [7]Moeschler JB, Shevell M, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Genetics Clinical genetic evaluation of the child with mental retardation or developmental delays. Pediatrics, 2006.PMID 16740881
- [9]Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 2010.PMID 20466091