Paeds Cases · acute-care-resuscitation-and-toxicology
Fluid bolus therapy and vasoactive support — long case
A long case following a three-year-old in septic shock through aliquot-based crystalloid resuscitation with reassessment after each bolus, the transition to vasoactive support for fluid-refractory shock, cold versus warm shock phenotyping and agent selection, the FEAST caution in a rural setting, fluid overload recognition, and the structured handover to retrieval.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Presentation
A three-year-old weighing 14 kilograms presents to a rural emergency department with fever for 12 hours, poor feeding, lethargy and a purpuric rash. The child is cool and mottled with weak central pulses, a capillary refill of 5 seconds, a heart rate of 175 per minute, a blood pressure of 68/42 mmHg and a reduced conscious state responding to voice. The hospital has intravenous access and crystalloid but no paediatric intensive care or vasoactive agents on site. Retrieval is available but transport time is 90 minutes. [4] [9]
Immediate assessment and first-hour plan
This child is in decompensated septic shock: hypotensive, poorly perfused, with altered consciousness and a purpuric rash suggesting meningococcal disease. I call for senior and retrieval help immediately, name a leader, allocate roles and bring monitoring. I confirm the weight as 14 kilograms for all dose calculations. [4]
First-hour fluid and vasoactive plan
Bolus 1
Give 20 mL per kilogram of 0.9 per cent sodium chloride (280 mL) over 5 to 20 minutes. State the expected response before giving: heart rate falling toward 130 per minute, shorter capillary refill, stronger pulses, warmer skin, improved interaction.
Reassess after bolus 1
Check heart rate, pulse quality, capillary refill, skin temperature, blood pressure, mental state, auscultation for crackles, and liver span. Check point-of-care lactate and glucose.
Bolus 2
If shock persists and there is no overload, give a second 20 mL per kilogram aliquot (280 mL). Reassess fully again.
Decision point at 40 mL per kilogram
If shock persists, this is fluid-refractory. Stop further fluid. Start adrenaline for cold shock at 0.05 to 0.5 micrograms per kilogram per minute through IO if central is not available.
Call retrieval in parallel
Call retrieval at the outset, not after local options fail. State retrieval time, treatment to continue, expected deterioration, and what to do if transport is delayed.
Fluid strategy and the FEAST caution
I apply the aliquot-based approach with rigorous reassessment after each bolus. The first-hour ceiling is 40 to 60 mL per kilogram, which I treat as a maximum, not a target. I stop immediately for any sign of overload or no benefit. [2]
In this rural setting, the FEAST evidence is directly relevant. FEAST found that bolus fluid increased mortality in African children with severe febrile illness who did not have access to intensive care rescue. The lesson is not that fluid is universally harmful, but that a fluid algorithm cannot be transplanted without considering the available rescue. Here, without vasoactive agents on site, I am even more vigilant: I give aliquots, reassess after each, and call retrieval early so that vasoactive support can be initiated by the retrieval team if needed. [1] [1]
[2] [9]Transition to vasoactive support
If the child remains in cold shock (cool, mottled, weak pulses, prolonged capillary refill) after 40 mL per kilogram of crystalloid, I start adrenaline at 0.05 to 0.5 micrograms per kilogram per minute. I use central access if immediately available, otherwise intraosseous access. I do not delay the first dose to place a central line. [3]
If the phenotype shifts to warm shock (warm dry skin, bounding pulses, flash capillary refill, wide pulse pressure), I switch to or add noradrenaline at 0.05 to 0.5 micrograms per kilogram per minute. I do not use dopamine as first-line because the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2020 guideline recommends adrenaline or noradrenaline over dopamine for paediatric septic shock. [3] [4]
[3] [9]Structured handover to retrieval
I hand over a structured summary covering identity and weight, current physiology and trend, the fluid aliquots given with times and responses, the vasoactive agent and dose if started, the shock phenotype, pending results, local limits, the family and safeguarding context, and the next contingency and its owner. I agree with the retrieval team what treatment will continue during transport, what deterioration to expect, and what to do if transport is delayed. [9]
Key examiner questions
What is the exact fluid bolus prescription for this child?
10 to 20 mL per kilogram of isotonic crystalloid per aliquot — for this 14 kilogram child, 140 to 280 mL — given over 5 to 20 minutes using a push-pull technique or rapid infuser. The first-hour ceiling is 40 to 60 mL per kilogram (560 to 840 mL total). I reassess after each aliquot and stop for no benefit, worsening, overload, or when the ceiling is reached. [2] [3]
When and how do you transition to vasoactive support?
When shock is fluid-refractory: persistent poor perfusion after 40 to 60 mL per kilogram in the first hour, or when signs of overload develop earlier. I choose the agent by phenotype: adrenaline for cold shock, noradrenaline for warm shock, both starting at 0.05 to 0.5 micrograms per kilogram per minute. I do not use dopamine as first-line. I prefer central access but use IO if central is not available, and I do not delay the first dose. [3] [4]
How does the FEAST trial change your management here?
FEAST found that bolus fluid increased mortality in African children with severe febrile illness who lacked intensive care rescue. Here, without vasoactive agents on site, I apply a more cautious strategy: rigorous reassessment after each aliquot, early stop for no benefit or overload, and retrieval called at the outset so vasoactive support can be provided by the retrieval team. The fluid strategy fits the child, the shock type and the available rescue. [1] [2]
References
- [1]Maitland, Kathryn Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection The New England journal of medicine, 2011.PMID 21615299
- [2]Weiss, Scott L Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Children 2026 Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2026.PMID 41869844
- [3]Weiss, Scott L Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2020.PMID 32032273
- [4]Bjorklund, Ashley Pediatric Shock Review Pediatrics in review, 2023.PMID 37777656
- [9]Gupta, Siddharth Advances in Shock Management and Fluid Resuscitation in Children Indian journal of pediatrics, 2023.PMID 36715864