Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Casesprofessional-practice-and-evidence

Paeds Cases · professional-practice-and-evidence

Counselling a family toward high-value care — OSCE

OSCE on explaining restraint and shared decision-making to a family requesting a low-value test and treatment.

osce shared decision and stewardship counselling
On this page & tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A parent brings their febrile, snuffling three-year-old with a viral upper respiratory infection and asks for 'the antibiotics that worked last time'; they are anxious, have read online that antibiotics prevent complications, and worry that not prescribing means their child is not being taken seriously.

Station brief (8–10 minutes)

Help the parent reach a high-value decision for their child by explaining why an antibiotic is not indicated, addressing their anxiety and the online information, and offering a clear safety-net. Demonstrate stewardship as patient-centred good medicine rather than cost-cutting. Do not invent specific drug doses or local cost figures. [1]

Tasks for the candidate

  1. Acknowledge and explore the parent's concern, their belief that antibiotics prevent complications, and what they hope the treatment will achieve. [9]
  2. Explain in plain language why an antibiotic is low-value for a viral illness, naming the harms of resistance, adverse effects and downstream demand. [16] [5]
  3. Share the decision and agree a safety-net, including clear return precautions and the option of a delayed prescription where appropriate. [13] [9]
  4. Frame restraint as good care for their child and confirm understanding with teach-back. [8]

Expected performance

Must hit. Concern acknowledged and explored rather than dismissed; plain-language explanation that antibiotics do not help viral illness and carry harms of resistance, adverse effects and future demand; safety-net with explicit return precautions; shared decision confirmed by teach-back; restraint framed as protecting the child, not as cost-cutting. [9] [13]

Merit. Names the parent's underlying need (reassurance and certainty) and meets it without the antibiotic; offers a delayed or backup prescription; checks health literacy and the online source respectfully; documents the decision and the safety-net for the next clinician. [16] [8]

Fail. Prescribes the antibiotic purely to end the encounter; dismisses the parent's concern or the online information; gives no safety-net; frames non-prescribing as policy or cost; fails to confirm understanding. [5] [13]

Sample candidate structure

"Thank you for bringing her in — I can see you are worried, and I want to make sure we do the right thing for her. Can you tell me what you read online and what you are hoping the antibiotic would do? … Her illness is almost certainly viral, and the good news is that antibiotics don't help viral infections and can actually cause harm — they can cause side effects, they make future infections harder to treat, and they often lead families back for more. … I am not refusing to treat her; I am choosing the treatment most likely to help and least likely to harm. Here is what we will do instead, and exactly when to come back. …" [16] [9]

References

  1. [1]Cassel CK, Guest JA Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care JAMA, 2012.PMID 22492759
  2. [5]Coon ER, Quinonez RA, Moyer VA, et al. Overdiagnosis: how our compulsion for diagnosis may be harming children Pediatrics, 2014.PMID 25287462
  3. [8]Elshaug AG, Rosenthal MB, Lavis JN, et al. Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care Lancet, 2017.PMID 28077228
  4. [9]Morgan DJ, Leppin AL, Smith CD, et al. A Practical Framework for Understanding and Reducing Medical Overuse: Conceptualizing Overuse Through the Patient-Clinician Interaction Journal of hospital medicine, 2017.PMID 28459906
  5. [13]Colla CH Swimming against the current--what might work to reduce low-value care? New England Journal of Medicine, 2014.PMID 25271601
  6. [16]Gerber JS, Prasad PA, Fiks AG, et al. Effect of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention on broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing by primary care pediatricians: a randomized trial JAMA, 2013.PMID 23757082