Paeds Cases · professional-practice-and-evidence
Counselling a family toward high-value care — OSCE
OSCE on explaining restraint and shared decision-making to a family requesting a low-value test and treatment.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Station brief (8–10 minutes)
Help the parent reach a high-value decision for their child by explaining why an antibiotic is not indicated, addressing their anxiety and the online information, and offering a clear safety-net. Demonstrate stewardship as patient-centred good medicine rather than cost-cutting. Do not invent specific drug doses or local cost figures. [1]
Tasks for the candidate
- Acknowledge and explore the parent's concern, their belief that antibiotics prevent complications, and what they hope the treatment will achieve. [9]
- Explain in plain language why an antibiotic is low-value for a viral illness, naming the harms of resistance, adverse effects and downstream demand. [16] [5]
- Share the decision and agree a safety-net, including clear return precautions and the option of a delayed prescription where appropriate. [13] [9]
- Frame restraint as good care for their child and confirm understanding with teach-back. [8]
Expected performance
Must hit. Concern acknowledged and explored rather than dismissed; plain-language explanation that antibiotics do not help viral illness and carry harms of resistance, adverse effects and future demand; safety-net with explicit return precautions; shared decision confirmed by teach-back; restraint framed as protecting the child, not as cost-cutting. [9] [13]
Merit. Names the parent's underlying need (reassurance and certainty) and meets it without the antibiotic; offers a delayed or backup prescription; checks health literacy and the online source respectfully; documents the decision and the safety-net for the next clinician. [16] [8]
Fail. Prescribes the antibiotic purely to end the encounter; dismisses the parent's concern or the online information; gives no safety-net; frames non-prescribing as policy or cost; fails to confirm understanding. [5] [13]
Sample candidate structure
"Thank you for bringing her in — I can see you are worried, and I want to make sure we do the right thing for her. Can you tell me what you read online and what you are hoping the antibiotic would do? … Her illness is almost certainly viral, and the good news is that antibiotics don't help viral infections and can actually cause harm — they can cause side effects, they make future infections harder to treat, and they often lead families back for more. … I am not refusing to treat her; I am choosing the treatment most likely to help and least likely to harm. Here is what we will do instead, and exactly when to come back. …" [16] [9]
References
- [1]Cassel CK, Guest JA Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care JAMA, 2012.PMID 22492759
- [5]Coon ER, Quinonez RA, Moyer VA, et al. Overdiagnosis: how our compulsion for diagnosis may be harming children Pediatrics, 2014.PMID 25287462
- [8]Elshaug AG, Rosenthal MB, Lavis JN, et al. Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care Lancet, 2017.PMID 28077228
- [9]Morgan DJ, Leppin AL, Smith CD, et al. A Practical Framework for Understanding and Reducing Medical Overuse: Conceptualizing Overuse Through the Patient-Clinician Interaction Journal of hospital medicine, 2017.PMID 28459906
- [13]Colla CH Swimming against the current--what might work to reduce low-value care? New England Journal of Medicine, 2014.PMID 25271601
- [16]Gerber JS, Prasad PA, Fiks AG, et al. Effect of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention on broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing by primary care pediatricians: a randomized trial JAMA, 2013.PMID 23757082