Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Casesallergy-and-immunology

Paeds Cases · allergy-and-immunology

Counsel and plan with a family switching from IVIG to home SCIG — OSCE

OSCE communication and shared-planning station: explaining a route switch from hospital intravenous to home subcutaneous immunoglobulin to the family of a boy with X-linked agammaglobulinaemia, the pharmacokinetic and quality-of-life rationale, what home therapy involves and how the family will be trained and supported, and the breakthrough-infection reassessment plan — while addressing the family's fear of self-infusion and the travel burden they currently carry.

osce communication and shared decision-making
On this page & tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCERCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
The parents of a six-year-old boy with X-linked agammaglobulinaemia, established on hospital intravenous immunoglobulin every four weeks, have travelled two hours for today's review. He has had three breakthrough pneumonias this year despite a trough in the lower half of the normal range. You are proposing a switch to home subcutaneous immunoglobulin and a reassessment of his regimen. The parents are frightened of giving infusions themselves, worried that home therapy means less expert oversight, and unsure why the trough that looked 'normal' was not protecting him.

Candidate brief

You have eight minutes to counsel the parents of a six-year-old boy with X-linked agammaglobulinaemia about switching from hospital intravenous to home subcutaneous immunoglobulin and about reassessing his regimen after breakthrough infection. Use a structured, honest, empathic approach. [1] [8]

Key teaching and communication objectives

Acknowledge and validate the parents' fear of self-infusion and their worry about losing expert oversight before delivering information. Explain that home subcutaneous therapy is not abandonment of care — the immunology team remains responsible for the regimen, the trough monitoring, and the training, and the family is supported at every step. [9] [8]

Explain in plain language why the trough that looked "normal" was not protecting their son: the number is a guide, but his repeated infection is the real signal, and dosing to the outcome means adjusting the regimen around his infection rate and lung function rather than around a single value. Address the pharmacokinetic rationale for the switch — subcutaneous therapy holds a steady, near-constant level instead of the peak-and-trough swing of intravenous dosing, which is why it tends to protect more evenly and is better tolerated. [2] [5]

Describe what home therapy involves: a weekly infusion into the subcutaneous tissue of the abdomen or thighs using a small pump, given at a time that fits the family's week; comprehensive training by the immunology nursing team before they ever infuse alone; a helpline and scheduled reviews; and the prospect of ending the two-hour hospital travel. Reassure them that local site reactions are usually mild and that the systemic reaction rate is low. [9] [8]

Close with a shared plan: a structured training schedule, a clear trough and infection-monitoring plan with named review points, an antibiotic-prophylaxis decision for the breakthrough infections, and a written summary plus contact details for the team. Offer written information and contact with a patient-support organisation. [1] [9]

References

  1. [1]Bonilla FA, Barlan I, Chapel H, et al. Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2015.PMID 26371839
  2. [2]Perez EE, Orange JS, Bonilla F, et al. Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: A review of evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2017.PMID 28041678
  3. [5]Suez D, Borte M, Ritchie B, et al. Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Human Immune Globulin Subcutaneous, 20% in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases in North America. J Clin Immunol, 2016.PMID 27582171
  4. [8]Abolhassani H, Sadaghiani MS, Aghamohammadi A, et al. Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin versus hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of primary antibody deficiencies: systematic review and meta analysis. J Clin Immunol, 2012.PMID 22730009
  5. [9]Duff C, Brown M, Vago M, Keet C. Nuts and Bolts of Subcutaneous Therapy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 2020.PMID 32654697