Paeds Cases · allergy-and-immunology
Counsel and plan with a family switching from IVIG to home SCIG — OSCE
OSCE communication and shared-planning station: explaining a route switch from hospital intravenous to home subcutaneous immunoglobulin to the family of a boy with X-linked agammaglobulinaemia, the pharmacokinetic and quality-of-life rationale, what home therapy involves and how the family will be trained and supported, and the breakthrough-infection reassessment plan — while addressing the family's fear of self-infusion and the travel burden they currently carry.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Candidate brief
You have eight minutes to counsel the parents of a six-year-old boy with X-linked agammaglobulinaemia about switching from hospital intravenous to home subcutaneous immunoglobulin and about reassessing his regimen after breakthrough infection. Use a structured, honest, empathic approach. [1] [8]
Key teaching and communication objectives
Acknowledge and validate the parents' fear of self-infusion and their worry about losing expert oversight before delivering information. Explain that home subcutaneous therapy is not abandonment of care — the immunology team remains responsible for the regimen, the trough monitoring, and the training, and the family is supported at every step. [9] [8]
Explain in plain language why the trough that looked "normal" was not protecting their son: the number is a guide, but his repeated infection is the real signal, and dosing to the outcome means adjusting the regimen around his infection rate and lung function rather than around a single value. Address the pharmacokinetic rationale for the switch — subcutaneous therapy holds a steady, near-constant level instead of the peak-and-trough swing of intravenous dosing, which is why it tends to protect more evenly and is better tolerated. [2] [5]
Describe what home therapy involves: a weekly infusion into the subcutaneous tissue of the abdomen or thighs using a small pump, given at a time that fits the family's week; comprehensive training by the immunology nursing team before they ever infuse alone; a helpline and scheduled reviews; and the prospect of ending the two-hour hospital travel. Reassure them that local site reactions are usually mild and that the systemic reaction rate is low. [9] [8]
Close with a shared plan: a structured training schedule, a clear trough and infection-monitoring plan with named review points, an antibiotic-prophylaxis decision for the breakthrough infections, and a written summary plus contact details for the team. Offer written information and contact with a patient-support organisation. [1] [9]
References
- [1]Bonilla FA, Barlan I, Chapel H, et al. Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2015.PMID 26371839
- [2]Perez EE, Orange JS, Bonilla F, et al. Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: A review of evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2017.PMID 28041678
- [5]Suez D, Borte M, Ritchie B, et al. Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Human Immune Globulin Subcutaneous, 20% in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases in North America. J Clin Immunol, 2016.PMID 27582171
- [8]Abolhassani H, Sadaghiani MS, Aghamohammadi A, et al. Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin versus hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of primary antibody deficiencies: systematic review and meta analysis. J Clin Immunol, 2012.PMID 22730009
- [9]Duff C, Brown M, Vago M, Keet C. Nuts and Bolts of Subcutaneous Therapy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am, 2020.PMID 32654697