Paeds Cases · child-safety-and-social-paediatrics
Suspected inflicted abdominal injury — long case
Long case on a pre-verbal child with delayed presentation of a rigid abdomen: pattern recognition, occult-injury screening, concurrent trauma-and-safeguarding management and safe disposition.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Objectives
- Recognise that a delayed rigid abdomen with an under-explanatory mechanism is inflicted injury until proven otherwise. [1]
- Construct the laboratory occult-injury screen and imaging strategy for a stable child. [2] [6]
- Run trauma-team care and safeguarding concurrently, not sequentially. [1] [5]
- Secure safe disposition before discharge. [1]
Candidate brief
A 16-month-old is referred by a general practitioner for two days of vomiting, abdominal distension and fever attributed to gastroenteritis. The carer mentions a short fall two days ago. Examination reveals a rigid, guarded abdomen and a faint flank bruise. The child is tachycardic but perfusing. [1]
Expected actions
- Run a structured primary survey, quantify shock through perfusion and lactate, and obtain large-bore access. [1]
- Recognise the pattern: a pre-verbal child, a rigid abdomen, delay, and an under-explanatory mechanism with a sentinel bruise. [1] [3]
- Request AST, ALT, lipase, amylase, FBC, lactate, coagulation and group-and-save; bedside FAST, and contrast-enhanced CT abdomen and chest if the child remains stable. [2] [6]
- Arrange a high-detail skeletal survey with oblique rib views and a repeat at two weeks. [4] [6]
- Activate the paediatric trauma team for peritonitis or instability; prepare theatre for a likely hollow-viscus perforation. [5]
- Notify child protection during resuscitation, file the mandatory report, and document and photograph injuries. [1]
- Plan disposition with a safe place for recovery before the MDT case conference agrees the destination. [1]
Marking
Pass: identifies the high-specificity pattern; requests the AST/ALT and lipase screen plus skeletal survey; operates for peritonitis; runs safeguarding in parallel; refuses premature discharge to the index household. [1] [2]
Fail: accepts gastroenteritis as the diagnosis on a soft early abdomen; omits the skeletal survey; defers child-protection notification until after surgery; discharges without a safe-placement plan. [1] [3]
References
- [1]Maguire SA A systematic review of abusive visceral injuries in childhood--their range and recognition Child Abuse Negl, 2013.PMID 23306146
- [2]Lindberg DM Utility of hepatic transaminases in children with concern for abuse Pediatrics, 2013.PMID 23319537
- [3]Sowrey L Duodenal injuries in the very young: child abuse? J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013.PMID 23271088
- [4]Kemp AM Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review BMJ, 2008.PMID 18832412
- [5]Rosenfeld EH Understanding non-accidental trauma in the United States: A national trauma databank study J Pediatr Surg, 2020.PMID 31103270
- [6]Wootton-Gorges SL ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) Suspected Physical Abuse-Child J Am Coll Radiol, 2017.PMID 28473090