Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Caseshaematology-oncology-and-transfusion

Paeds Cases · haematology-oncology-and-transfusion

Long-term follow-up and late effects of childhood cancer: Case

Clinical long case of a twenty-two-year-old woman presenting to the survivorship clinic fifteen years after the treatment of a childhood Hodgkin lymphoma with a cumulative anthracycline dose and chest radiation, covering the treatment-summary-driven and risk-stratified surveillance, the anthracycline cardiomyopathy, the radiation-associated breast cancer surveillance, the endocrine and the fertility late effects, and the structured transition to the adult late-effects service.

paediatric oncology survivorship long case
On this page & tools

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A twenty-two-year-old woman is reviewed in the survivorship clinic fifteen years after she was treated for a stage two Hodgkin lymphoma at the age of seven with six cycles of chemotherapy including a cumulative doxorubicin-equivalent dose of three hundred milligrams per square metre and involved-field chest radiation of thirty gray. She reports six months of increasing exercise intolerance, with dyspnoea on climbing one flight of stairs and occasional palpitations. She also asks whether she will be able to have children. The examination shows a quiet heart with a third heart sound at the apex, a normal thyroid and no palpable breast mass. The examiner asks how you frame the problem, how you build the surveillance, how you manage the late effects, and how you counsel and transition her.

Framing the case

This twenty-two-year-old woman is a childhood cancer survivor at the age of fifteen years post-treatment, and her presentation brings together the three highest-yield late effects of the childhood cancer therapy. The cumulative anthracycline dose of three hundred milligrams per square metre places her in the high-risk group for the cardiomyopathy, because it exceeds the two hundred and fifty milligrams per square metre threshold, and her exercise intolerance with the third heart sound is the clinical declaration of the cardiac late effect. The chest radiation of thirty gray places her in the high-risk group for the breast cancer, because it exceeds the twenty gray threshold. The treatment exposures and the symptoms together frame the case as the risk-stratified survivorship assessment, and the first priority is the urgent cardiac assessment. [1][5]

The immediate assessment and the cardiac investigation

The assessment begins with the treatment summary, which documents the diagnosis, the cumulative anthracycline dose, the chest radiation dose and the other exposures. The summary is mapped onto the Children's Oncology Group guidelines to generate the surveillance plan. The urgent echocardiogram is the key test, because the exercise intolerance with the third heart sound in a survivor with the high anthracycline dose is the anthracycline cardiomyopathy until proven otherwise. The echocardiogram measures the left ventricular ejection fraction and the shortening fraction, and the electrocardiogram looks for the arrhythmia. The troponin and the natriuretic peptide are the adjuncts, and the cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is considered if the echocardiogram is discordant. The cardio-oncology team is involved early. [5]

The exercise intolerance is not the deconditioning here

The temptation is to attribute the exercise intolerance of the twenty-two-year-old to the deconditioning or the lifestyle, and this is the classic pitfall. In the survivor with the cumulative anthracycline dose of three hundred milligrams per square metre, the exercise intolerance with the third heart sound is the anthracycline cardiomyopathy until the echocardiogram proves otherwise. The symptom is mapped onto the treatment exposure, and the surveillance test is ordered before the symptom is dismissed. The lesson is that the treatment summary and the exposure-to-effect link are the tools that catch the late effect.

[5]

The cardiac management

The echocardiogram confirms the reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and the management begins at the subclinical dysfunction. The survivor is referred to the cardio-oncology service, and the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or the angiotensin-receptor blocker is started to reduce the afterload and to slow the progression. The symptomatic heart failure is managed with the standard therapy, and the end-stage cardiomyopathy may require the heart transplantation, which carries an excellent outcome in the selected survivor. The avoidance of the additional cardiotoxic exposure, the blood-pressure control and the lifestyle form the preventive layer, and the lifelong echocardiographic surveillance continues. The anthracycline cardiomyopathy carries a poorer prognosis than the idiopathic, because the anthracycline injures the terminally differentiated cardiomyocyte irreversibly. [5]

The endocrine and the fertility assessment

The endocrine panel includes the thyroid function, the hypothalamic-pituitary hormone panel and the bone density. The gonadal function is assessed with the luteinising hormone, the follicle-stimulating hormone and the oestradiol, because the alkylating agent and the radiation exposure carry the gonadotoxicity risk. The premature ovarian failure and the infertility are the late effects that the survivor reports as the most distressing, and the fertility is addressed with the reproductive medicine referral. The fertility preservation, the oocyte or the embryo cryopreservation, is offered before any further gonadotoxic therapy, and the reproductive medicine referral is made for the assessment and the counselling. The growth hormone deficiency and the hypothyroidism, if present, are treated with the replacement, and the adrenal insufficiency is treated with the hydrocortisone and the sick-day plan. [3]

The oncologic surveillance

The breast surveillance is the annual mammography and the breast magnetic resonance imaging, beginning at eight years after the radiation or at age twenty five, whichever occurs later. Because she is twenty-two and fifteen years post-radiation, she has entered the surveillance window, and the breast magnetic resonance imaging is arranged. The breast tissue of the pubertal girl is exquisitely sensitive to the radiation, so that the chest radiation of thirty gray during the childhood carries the breast cancer risk that approaches that of the BRCA carrier by the age of fifty. The thyroid examination and the ultrasound are performed for the thyroid cancer risk after the neck and the chest radiation, and the annual full blood count is considered for the therapy-related myelodysplasia risk. [9]

Contrasting the second malignancy

The examiner asks the candidate to discuss the risk of the second malignancy. The breast cancer after the chest radiation is the commonest subsequent malignancy in the female survivor, and the surveillance mammography and the magnetic resonance imaging are designed to catch it at the earliest stage. The thyroid cancer after the neck radiation is the second commonest, and the annual thyroid examination and the ultrasound are the surveillance. The central nervous system tumour after the cranial radiation and the therapy-related myelodysplasia after the chemotherapy complete the list, and each carries the surveillance that the treatment summary drives. The second malignancy is the leading cause of the premature death in the survivor, which is why the oncologic surveillance is among the most heavily weighted. [9]

Communication, the transition and the family

The family is counselled honestly and comprehensively. The candidate names the late effects, the surveillance plan and the management for each domain, and she is introduced to the multidisciplinary team. The structured transition to the adult late-effects service is prepared, with the survivor taught the diagnosis, the exposures, the surveillance plan and the late-effect symptoms, and the written treatment summary and the care plan are handed to the named adult provider. The transition is a clinical act, and the fellow who builds the transition plan demonstrates the care that extends the surveillance beyond the paediatric service. The loss to the follow-up is the greatest threat to the late-effect outcome, and the transition plan and the patient-held summary are the interventions that keep the survivor in the lifelong care. [11]

The single framework that carries the case

The treatment summary is the foundation, and the exposure-to-effect link is the reasoning. The anthracycline dose drives the cardiomyopathy, the chest radiation drives the breast cancer, the cranial radiation drives the neurocognitive and the endocrine failure, and the alkylating agents drive the gonadal failure. The surveillance is built by mapping the summary onto the guidelines, and it is delivered as the lifelong multidisciplinary plan that transitions the survivor to the adult service. This one framework carries the whole case from the survivorship clinic to the adult late-effects care.

[1][2]

References

  1. [1]Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer N Engl J Med, 2006.PMID 17035650
  2. [2]DeVine A, Landier W, Hudson MM The Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers: A Review JAMA Oncol, 2025.PMID 39976936
  3. [5]Leerink JM, de Baat EC, Feijen EAM Cardiac Disease in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Risk Prediction, Prevention, and Surveillance: JACC CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review JACC CardioOncol, 2020.PMID 34396245
  4. [3]Chemaitilly W, Cohen LE, Mostoufi-Moab S Endocrine Late Effects in Childhood Cancer Survivors J Clin Oncol, 2018.PMID 29874130
  5. [9]Armstrong GT, Liu W, Leisenring W Occurrence of multiple subsequent neoplasms in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study J Clin Oncol, 2011.PMID 21709189
  6. [11]Fardell JE, Wakefield CE, Signorelli C Transition of childhood cancer survivors to adult care: The survivor perspective Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2017.PMID 28436208