Paeds Cases · mental-behavioural-and-psychosomatic
Paediatric mental state examination OSCE — observing, interviewing alone, and a same-visit safety assessment
Observed structured encounter testing observation of the domains, securing time alone with an adolescent, integrating a brief screen, and delivering a same-visit response to a positive mood and suicide-risk finding.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Station objectives
- Set the conditions for a mental state examination and observe before interviewing. [7] [8]
- Secure time alone with an adolescent and state conditional confidentiality. [8]
- Walk the seven domains and integrate a brief validated screen. [1] [2] [5]
- Deliver a same-visit suicide-risk assessment and a disposition matched to risk. [5] [6]
Candidate brief
You are the paediatric doctor in clinic. You have 8 minutes for Station A (triadic start and time alone) and 12 minutes for Station B (private assessment and safety plan). Examiners score process, safety, and partnership language. [7] [8]
Station A — Securing time alone
Setup: 15-year-old and parent; parent says "I will stay, there is nothing we do not discuss." [8]
Expected actions:
- Greet the young person first and observe appearance and behaviour from entry. [7]
- Explain that part of the visit is private and normal at this age, framing it around growing independence rather than secrecy. [8]
- Give the parent a defined task and a clear time, staying warm and firm. [8]
- State a conditional confidentiality line with its limits to both. [8]
Station B — Positive screen and safety assessment
Setup: Once alone, the adolescent describes two weeks of low mood, sleep change, and passive thoughts of death without a clear plan; the PHQ-based screen is positive. [2] [5]
Expected actions:
- Complete the relevant domains, approaching mood, thought content, and perception gently. [7]
- Perform a same-visit suicide-risk assessment: ideation, plan, intent, means, prior attempts, protective factors, ability to stay safe tonight. [5] [6]
- Decide crisis pathway versus early review with a written safety plan, and do not rely on a delayed referral. [5]
- Agree the plan with the adolescent first, decide what stays confidential, and make a warm hand-off. [6]
Marking anchors
Clear pass: observes before interviewing, secures time alone with a resistant parent, correct confidentiality limits stated unprompted, seven domains walked, a same-visit suicide-risk assessment, a written safety plan, and a disposition matched to risk. [7] [5] [6]
Borderline: good rapport but an incomplete risk assessment, a vague follow-up interval, or a confidentiality statement given only when prompted. [8]
Fail: no private time; the whole MSE taken in front of the parent; ignores the positive screen or files it for later; lectures rather than asks; uses a family member as interpreter for sensitive content. [8] [5]
Debrief pearls
- Observe before you interview — the first seconds are the most honest data. [7]
- A parent-dominated adolescent MSE is a false negative. [8]
- The same-visit response to a positive screen is the pass-or-fail discriminator. [5]
- Record the MSE descriptively; keep the formulation separate. [7]
References
- [1]Goodman R Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2001.PMID 11699809
- [2]Kroenke K, Spitzer RL The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001.PMID 11556941
- [3]Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2006.PMID 16717171
- [4]Knight JR, Sherritt L, Shrier LA, Harris SK, Chang G Validity of the CRAFFT substance abuse screening test among adolescent clinic patients. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2002.PMID 12038895
- [5]Mangione CM, US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Depression and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA, 2022.PMID 36219440
- [6]Shain B, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Adolescence Suicide and Suicide Attempts in Adolescents. Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 27354459
- [7]Birmaher B, Brent D, AACAP Work Group on Quality Issues Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2007.PMID 18049300
- [8]Cohen E, MacKenzie RG, Yates GL HEADSS, a psychosocial risk assessment instrument: implications for designing effective intervention programs for runaway youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 1991.PMID 1772892