Paeds Cases · fetal-neonatal-and-perinatal
Newborn examination — focused newborn check OSCE
OSCE on performing a focused newborn examination, completing the universal screens, and escalating an abnormal finding while communicating with the parent.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Objectives
- Perform a systematic head-to-toe newborn examination in a logical order, with the hips last. [19]
- Complete the four universal screens and interpret an abnormal pulse-oximetry result. [1]
- Communicate findings, the next steps, and a safety-net clearly to the parent. [1] [19]
Candidate brief
Eight-to-ten-minute station. You are asked to examine a 26-hour-old term newborn and to discuss your findings and the screening programme with the parent, who is watching at the bedside. During the station you are told the pulse-oximetry reading: right hand 96%, foot 88%. There are no antenatal concerns and the pregnancy was uncomplicated. [1] [19]
Expected actions
- Wash hands, warm hands, and introduce yourself to the parent. [19]
- Observe the baby first: colour, tone, posture, and any dysmorphism. [19]
- Examine head-to-toe: fontanelles, eyes with red reflex, ears, palate (visualise the posterior shelf), chest and heart with femoral pulses, abdomen, genitalia and anus, then hips (Barlow and Ortolani), spine and skin. [5] [11] [19]
- State the pulse-oximetry result and interpret it as a positive screen. [1]
- Explain to the parent in plain language that the oxygen reading is low, that it needs repeating and a heart check, and that a specialist review and a heart ultrasound will be arranged. [1] [2]
- Provide a written safety-net for poor feeding, colour change, breathing difficulty, or fever. [19]
Marking
Pass: systematic, warm examination with hips last; correct interpretation of the abnormal pulse oximetry; clear escalation plan (repeat, echocardiography, cardiology; prostaglandins if unwell); plain-language explanation and a safety-net. [1] [2] [19]
Fail: omitting the red reflex or hip examination; accepting the abnormal saturation as normal; failing to escalate or arrange echocardiography; no safety-net; dismissive or jargon-laden communication. [1] [11]
Model synthesis
The newborn examination is a systematic head-to-toe assessment with the four universal screens woven through it. An abnormal pulse-oximetry reading (foot under 90 per cent) is a positive screen that requires repeat, clinical assessment, echocardiography, and cardiology referral — with prostaglandins if the baby is unwell or duct-dependent disease is suspected. Every abnormal finding is communicated in plain language with a clear next step and a written safety-net. [1] [2] [19]
References
- [1]Mahle WT Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the AHA and AAP. Pediatrics, 2009.PMID 19581259
- [2]Plana MN Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018.PMID 29494750
- [5]Zhang S Developmental dysplasia of the hip. British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005), 2020.PMID 32730146
- [6]Maikku M The Ortolani test has a high positive predictive value in clinical hip screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2023.PMID 36928888
- [8]Wrightson AS Universal newborn hearing screening. American family physician, 2007.PMID 17508530
- [11]Cagini C Red reflex examination in neonates: evaluation of 3 years of screening. International ophthalmology, 2017.PMID 27822637
- [15]Kucera JN The simple sacral dimple: diagnostic yield of ultrasound in neonates. Pediatric radiology, 2015.PMID 24996813
- [16]Albert GW Spine ultrasounds should not be routinely performed for patients with simple sacral dimples. Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2016.PMID 27059606
- [19]Townsend J Routine examination of the newborn: the EMREN study. Evaluation of an extension of the midwife role including a randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained midwives and paediatric senior house officers. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2004.PMID 15038906