Paeds Cases · professional-practice-and-evidence
Open disclosure after a medication error — OSCE
OSCE on staged open disclosure after a tenfold medication error, addressing acknowledgement, apology, language access and follow-up.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Station brief (8–10 minutes)
Conduct the initial open-disclosure conversation with the parents after the tenfold medication error. The child is stable. Acknowledge what happened, apologise, give the known facts, arrange appropriate follow-up, and ensure language access. Do not invent jurisdiction-specific statutory wording or local tribunal procedure. [1] [4]
Tasks for the candidate
- Confirm the child is safe and stable; assemble the right people and a private setting. [1] [4]
- Ensure a trained interpreter is present; do not use the child or a family member. [5]
- Acknowledge what happened in plain language and give the known facts honestly. [1] [2]
- Apologise with a sincere expression of regret for the harm, owning the event without blaming an individual. [1] [2]
- Check understanding with teach-back, invite questions, name a single point of contact, and arrange the follow-up disclosure. [4] [14]
Expected performance
Must hit. Confirms the child is stable before disclosure; private setting with the right people; trained interpreter used (never the child); acknowledges what happened in plain language with the known facts; offers a sincere apology that owns the harm; avoids blaming an individual in front of the family; teach-back of understanding; names a point of contact and arranges follow-up; documents the conversation. [1] [4] [5]
Merit. Distinguishes the initial disclosure from the follow-up explicitly; addresses that the apology is owed and is not an admission of liability; names the second victim and arranges support for the clinician; offers a written summary; commits to sharing the improvement plan at follow-up. [2] [14]
Fail. Stays silent or trickle-discloses because the child 'seems fine'; uses the child as interpreter; uses defensive language ('sorry this happened to you'); blames the nurse or registrar in front of the family; offers no apology, no teach-back, no follow-up and no documentation. [1] [2]
Sample candidate structure
“Thank you both for sitting down with me. I have asked for an interpreter so we can be sure you understand everything — this is too important to get wrong. I need to tell you something serious. Overnight, [child] was given ten times the intended dose of a pain medicine, because of a decimal-point error on the chart. The nurse realised very quickly. We gave the medicine to reverse it, and [child] is now stable and comfortable. I am very sorry this happened, and sorry that your child was exposed to this. We are reviewing exactly how it occurred so it does not happen again, and I will meet with you again to tell you what we found and what we will change. What questions do you have right now? I will be your point of contact, and I will leave you a written summary of what we have discussed.” [1] [2] [4]
References
- [1]Iedema RA The National Open Disclosure Pilot: evaluation of a policy implementation initiative. The Medical journal of Australia, 2008.PMID 18393742
- [2]Iedema R Patients' and family members' experiences of open disclosure following adverse events. International journal for quality in health care, 2008.PMID 18801752
- [4]Jacob H Openness and honesty when things go wrong: the professional duty of candour (GMC guideline). Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition, 2016.PMID 27002114
- [5]Inkster T Duty of candour and communication during an infection control incident in a paediatric ward of a Scottish hospital. Journal of medical ethics, 2022.PMID 33593873
- [14]New L Second-Victim Phenomenon. Nursing clinics of North America, 2024.PMID 38272580