Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Casesgastroenterology-hepatology-and-nutrition

Paeds Cases · gastroenterology-hepatology-and-nutrition

Paediatric feeding disorder: nutritional and gastrointestinal management — structured clinical encounter

Structured encounter testing the nutritional and gastrointestinal management of a three-year-old with cerebral palsy whose food refusal, faltering growth and poorly controlled reflux have been labelled behavioural: recognising the four domains of paediatric feeding disorder, treating the medical driver first, applying structured behavioural intervention, and deciding on enteral feeding with a tube-weaning plan.

structured clinical encounter
On this page & tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A three-year-old with cerebral palsy has refused most foods for six months, accepting only smooth yoghurt and milk. Her weight has fallen from the tenth to below the third centile. Her gastro-oesophageal reflux has been poorly controlled and she is constipated. Her food refusal has been labelled behavioural. You are the paediatric registrar working through the consensus definition, the four-domain assessment, the stepped multidisciplinary management, and the decision on enteral feeding.

Station brief (candidate)

You are the paediatric registrar in a gastroenterology and nutrition clinic. A three-year-old with cerebral palsy has refused most foods for six months, accepting only smooth yoghurt and milk. Her weight has fallen from the tenth to below the third centile. Her reflux has been poorly controlled and she is constipated, and her food refusal has been labelled behavioural. The team asks you to define her condition, to carry out the four-domain assessment, to explain why the behavioural label is incomplete, to outline the stepped multidisciplinary management, and to advise on the role of enteral feeding. You have twelve minutes with the team and five minutes for examiner discussion. [4]

Information available on request

  • Three years old, cerebral palsy, non-ambulant; food refusal for six months accepting only smooth yoghurt and milk. [4]
  • Weight fallen from the tenth to below the third centile over six months; length centile stable. [1]
  • Gastro-oesophageal reflux poorly controlled on current therapy; constipated, opening bowels every four to five days. [4]
  • No reported coughing or choking with feeds; some wetness to the voice noted with thin liquids. [1]
  • Full blood count shows microcytic anaemia with low ferritin; other micronutrients not yet screened. [4]

Tasks

  1. Give the consensus definition of her condition and explain why the behavioural label is incomplete. [1]
  2. Outline the four-domain assessment that should precede the management plan. [1]
  3. Explain the stepped multidisciplinary management, including the first lever and the role of structured behavioural intervention. [5]
  4. Advise on the role of enteral feeding and the tube-weaning principle, distinguishing the approach from avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. [12] [9]
  5. Counsel the family on the outlook, the carer burden, and preserving safe oral feeding for pleasure. [11]

Marking anchors

Must-hit

  • Defines paediatric feeding disorder using the 2019 Goday consensus as impaired oral intake that is not age-appropriate, associated with medical, nutritional, feeding skill and/or psychosocial dysfunction, and explains that the behavioural label is incomplete because this child has clear medical (reflux, constipation), nutritional (faltering growth, iron deficiency) and likely feeding-skill and psychosocial components that require assessment across all four domains. [1] [4]
  • Identifies treating the reflux and constipation as the first management lever, because feeding will not improve while the gut is uncomfortable, and explains that the conditioned aversion will also need structured behavioural intervention so treating the gut alone may not resolve the refusal. [4]
  • Outlines the stepped plan: treat the medical driver, build feeding skill, apply structured behavioural intervention, support nutrition with fortification and oral supplements and correct the iron deficiency, and escalate to enteral feeding with the ESPGHAN guidance and an active tube-weaning plan when intake is unsafe or insufficient. [5] [12]

Merit

  • Distinguishes paediatric feeding disorder (organ-based) from avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (DSM-5 psychiatric eating disorder), notes that the two can coexist, and screens for an unsafe swallow before pushing oral intake given the wet voice; addresses the substantial carer burden shown in the qualitative evidence and offers carer support and respite. [9] [11]

Fail

  • Accepts the behavioural label and refers to psychology alone without treating the reflux and constipation or completing the four-domain assessment. [4]
  • Pushes oral intake or moves straight to a gastrostomy without an instrumental swallow study to exclude aspiration and without a tube-weaning plan. [12]

References

  1. [1]Goday PS; Huh SY; Silverman A Pediatric Feeding Disorder: Consensus Definition and Conceptual Framework. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2019.PMID 30358739
  2. [4]Silverman A; Wall MA; Begotka A Feeding Disorders: Current State and Future Directions. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2025.PMID 41238275
  3. [5]Sharp WG; Volkert VM; Scahill L A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intensive Multidisciplinary Intervention for Pediatric Feeding Disorders: How Standard Is the Standard of Care? J Pediatr, 2017.PMID 27843007
  4. [9]Katzman DK; Norris ML; Zucker N Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am, 2019.PMID 30704639
  5. [11]Taylor C; Badawi N; Novak I Caregivers' experiences of feeding children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Evid Synth, 2025.PMID 40012369
  6. [12]Homan M; Hauser B; Romano C Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: An Update to the ESPGHAN Position Paper. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2021.PMID 34155150