Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Casesgrowth-development-and-behaviour

Paeds Cases · growth-development-and-behaviour

Sensory differences counselling — communication OSCE

OSCE on validating sensory concerns, excluding mimics, environmental plans and honest therapy evidence.

osce communication and developmental counselling
On this page & tools

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCE

Target exams

MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCE
Prompt
8-year-old with noise and clothing sensitivity affecting school; parents request a sensory processing disorder diagnosis and expensive private programme.

Objectives

  1. Validate sensory concerns without over-labelling. [1]
  2. Screen for medical mimics and broader neurodevelopment. [3]
  3. Build an environmental and school plan. [6]
  4. Discuss OT evidence honestly. [4]

Candidate brief

12-minute station with parents. Child not acutely unwell. [1]

Expected actions

  • Open with belief and partnership; map noise/touch/food contexts and function. [1]
  • Ask about hearing, pain, sleep, anxiety, social communication and attention. [3]
  • Explain dimensional sensory features; avoid promising a single contested SPD stamp as the whole answer. [1]
  • Offer environment and school adjustments first; OT referral with participation goals. [6]
  • Explain mixed intervention evidence without dismissing family hope. [4]
  • Safety-net medical red flags and family stress. [9]
  • If procedures arise later: adapt care, do not abandon. [10]

Marking

Pass: validation, mimic screen, practical plan, honest evidence, no care refusal ethic. [4] [10]
Fail: dismissive “just naughty”; miracle cure sales; no school plan; refuses indicated care for sensory reasons. [10]

References

  1. [1]Miller LJ Concept evolution in sensory integration: a proposed nosology for diagnosis The American journal of occupational therapy, 2007.PMID 17436834
  2. [3]Ben-Sasson A Update of a Meta-analysis of Sensory Symptoms in ASD: A New Decade of Research Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2019.PMID 31501953
  3. [4]Case-Smith J A systematic review of sensory processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders Autism, 2015.PMID 24477447
  4. [6]Clark GF Occupational Therapy Interventions for Children and Youth With Challenges in Sensory Integration and Sensory Processing: A School-Based Practice Case Example The American journal of occupational therapy, 2019.PMID 31120849
  5. [9]Kirby AV Sensory Features and Family Functioning in Families of Children With Autism and Developmental Disabilities: Longitudinal Associations The American journal of occupational therapy, 2019.PMID 30915965
  6. [10]Wolfe ID Should Tactile Defensiveness Exclude a Life-Sustaining Intervention in an Adolescent With Autism? Pediatrics, 2022.PMID 35229117