Paeds Cases · endocrinology-diabetes-and-growth
Short stature and poor linear growth — OSCE
OSCE skills and counselling station on growth measurement, chart interpretation and parent explanation for a short child.
osce skills and communication station
On this page & tools
Target exams
MRCPCH ClinicalRACP DCE
Prompt
12-minute station: interpret a plotted growth set for a school-age child with a short-stature concern and counsel the caregiver.
Objectives
- Confirm measurement and chart quality before interpretation. [1]
- Interpret position, velocity and mid-parental context. [1] [3]
- Screen for red flags: disproportionate build, poor velocity, systemic signs, psychosocial concern. [1] [4]
- Counsel without blame and set a clear, safe plan. [1]
Candidate brief
You have 12 minutes. The station provides a growth chart for a 7-year-old boy whose parents are worried he is short. Demonstrate how you would check measurement quality (describe it if no live measurement is possible), interpret the plot, and explain the findings to the caregiver. [1]
Expected actions
- State that you would re-measure height and weight with correct technique, on the chart for the correct age and sex. [1]
- Comment on centile position and whether the channel is parallel or falling — velocity over a single point. [1]
- Ask parental heights and relate the child's height to the mid-parental corridor. [3]
- Screen for disproportionate build (upper-to-lower segment, arm span), dysmorphism, systemic symptoms and psychosocial concern. [1] [4]
- Explain the findings in plain language with teach-back, and agree a plan — observe, investigate, or refer — with a safety-net. [1]
Marking grid
| Domain | Must-hit points |
|---|---|
| Technique/chart | Re-measure; correct chart/age/sex |
| Interpretation | Velocity plus mid-parental height, not a single point |
| Red flags | Disproportion, downward crossing, systemic signs |
| Communication | Plain language, no shame, teach-back |
| Plan | Observe vs investigate/refer; clear safety-net |
| Mark against measurement quality, velocity, mid-parental context and non-stigmatising counselling. [1] [3] |
Common fails
- Diagnosing disease from one low point without the serial trend.
- Failing to ask parental heights or measure body proportion.
- Using the wrong chart or uncorrected prematurity.
- Stigmatising language, or promising adult height from the formula alone. [1] [3]
References
- [1]Barstow C, Rerucha C Evaluation of Short and Tall Stature in Children. American Family Physician, 2015.PMID 26132126
- [2]Cohen P, Rogol AD, Deal CL, et al Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of children with idiopathic short stature: a summary of the Growth Hormone Research Society, the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology Workshop. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2008.PMID 18782877
- [3]Ciancia S, Cajas PR, Binot J, et al How accurate is Tanner's formula in estimating target height? BMC Pediatrics, 2025.PMID 41350675
- [4]Murray PG, Dattani MT, Clayton PE Controversies in the diagnosis and management of growth hormone deficiency in childhood and adolescence. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2016.PMID 26153506