Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Casescardiology

Paeds Cases · cardiology

Syncope and orthostatic intolerance — structured clinical encounter

Structured encounter testing the approach to a 13-year-old boy who collapses while sprinting with no prodrome and a family history of sudden death: the cardiac red-flag history, the ECG-for-every-child rule, the urgent cardiac work-up and sport restriction, the family screening conversation, and the contrast with the adolescent girl whose chronic daily symptoms meet POTS criteria.

structured clinical encounter
On this page & tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
A 13-year-old boy is brought to the emergency department after collapsing while sprinting the 400 metres at school. He had no prodrome. His father died suddenly at 34 years of age, and a paternal uncle drowned in unclear circumstances. On arrival he is fully recovered and back to normal. Heart rate is 76, blood pressure is 112/70 with equal four-limb pulses, and cardiovascular examination is normal. The examining registrar records the cardiac red flags of exertional syncope, absent prodrome and a family history of sudden death, and recognises that this must be treated as cardiac syncope until proven otherwise.

Encounter structure

The candidate works through the case in five phases: [5]

  1. Recognition (5 minutes): Identify the cardiac red-flag history (exertional syncope, absent prodrome, family history of sudden death) and state that this is cardiac syncope until proven otherwise; distinguish it from a benign vasovagal faint by the absence of the reassuring features. [1]

  2. Immediate assessment and sport restriction (5 minutes): Obtain a 12-lead ECG immediately and measure the corrected QT interval, looking for long-QT, Wolff-Parkinson-White, Brugada pattern and hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy voltage; restrict the boy from all competitive sport and physical exertion pending evaluation. [11]

  3. Investigation and cardiology referral (5 minutes): Arrange an echocardiogram and cardiology referral; request an exercise stress test and ambulatory ECG monitoring as guided by cardiology; screen first-degree relatives with an ECG given the family history of sudden death. [5]

  4. The family conversation (5 minutes): Explain in plain language why exertional collapse with a family history is treated seriously; describe the work-up plan and the temporary sport restriction; set honest expectations about the inherited arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy differential while awaiting results. [11]

  5. Contrast and follow-up planning (5 minutes): Contrast this presentation with the adolescent girl whose chronic daily orthostatic symptoms meet POTS criteria (heart-rate rise at least 30 bpm over 10 minutes of standing without a blood-pressure fall), managed non-pharmacologically with hydration, salt and reconditioning; outline the structured follow-up and the clear safety-net for both patients. [7] [9]

References

  1. [1]Anderson JB; Czosek RJ; Knilans TK; et al The Evaluation and Management of Pediatric Syncope. Pediatr Neurol, 2016.PMID 26706050
  2. [5]Schunk PC Pediatric Syncope: High-Risk Conditions and Reasonable Approach. Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2018.PMID 29622324
  3. [7]Sheldon RS; Grubb BP; Olshansky B; et al 2015 heart rhythm society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope. Heart Rhythm, 2015.PMID 25980576
  4. [8]Vernino S; Stiles LE; Low P; et al Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): State of the science and clinical care from a 2019 National Institutes of Health Expert Consensus Meeting - Part 1. Auton Neurosci, 2021.PMID 34144933
  5. [9]Soroken C; Lesavre N; Tard C; et al Postural tachycardia syndrome among adolescents. Arch Pediatr, 2022.PMID 35523634
  6. [11]Goldenberg I; Moss AJ; Zareba W Long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008.PMID 18549912