Paeds Cases · cardiology
Syncope and orthostatic intolerance — structured clinical encounter
Structured encounter testing the approach to a 13-year-old boy who collapses while sprinting with no prodrome and a family history of sudden death: the cardiac red-flag history, the ECG-for-every-child rule, the urgent cardiac work-up and sport restriction, the family screening conversation, and the contrast with the adolescent girl whose chronic daily symptoms meet POTS criteria.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Encounter structure
The candidate works through the case in five phases: [5]
-
Recognition (5 minutes): Identify the cardiac red-flag history (exertional syncope, absent prodrome, family history of sudden death) and state that this is cardiac syncope until proven otherwise; distinguish it from a benign vasovagal faint by the absence of the reassuring features. [1]
-
Immediate assessment and sport restriction (5 minutes): Obtain a 12-lead ECG immediately and measure the corrected QT interval, looking for long-QT, Wolff-Parkinson-White, Brugada pattern and hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy voltage; restrict the boy from all competitive sport and physical exertion pending evaluation. [11]
-
Investigation and cardiology referral (5 minutes): Arrange an echocardiogram and cardiology referral; request an exercise stress test and ambulatory ECG monitoring as guided by cardiology; screen first-degree relatives with an ECG given the family history of sudden death. [5]
-
The family conversation (5 minutes): Explain in plain language why exertional collapse with a family history is treated seriously; describe the work-up plan and the temporary sport restriction; set honest expectations about the inherited arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy differential while awaiting results. [11]
-
Contrast and follow-up planning (5 minutes): Contrast this presentation with the adolescent girl whose chronic daily orthostatic symptoms meet POTS criteria (heart-rate rise at least 30 bpm over 10 minutes of standing without a blood-pressure fall), managed non-pharmacologically with hydration, salt and reconditioning; outline the structured follow-up and the clear safety-net for both patients. [7] [9]
References
- [1]Anderson JB; Czosek RJ; Knilans TK; et al The Evaluation and Management of Pediatric Syncope. Pediatr Neurol, 2016.PMID 26706050
- [5]Schunk PC Pediatric Syncope: High-Risk Conditions and Reasonable Approach. Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2018.PMID 29622324
- [7]Sheldon RS; Grubb BP; Olshansky B; et al 2015 heart rhythm society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of postural tachycardia syndrome, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and vasovagal syncope. Heart Rhythm, 2015.PMID 25980576
- [8]Vernino S; Stiles LE; Low P; et al Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS): State of the science and clinical care from a 2019 National Institutes of Health Expert Consensus Meeting - Part 1. Auton Neurosci, 2021.PMID 34144933
- [9]Soroken C; Lesavre N; Tard C; et al Postural tachycardia syndrome among adolescents. Arch Pediatr, 2022.PMID 35523634
- [11]Goldenberg I; Moss AJ; Zareba W Long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008.PMID 18549912