Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds SAQsrheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports

Paeds SAQs · rheumatology-musculoskeletal-and-sports

Clubfoot and congenital limb anomalies: SAQ

Short-answer questions on the clubfoot and congenital limb anomalies, covering the four classical deformities (cavus, adductus, varus, equinus) and the CAVE mnemonic, the Ponseti method of serial casting with the percutaneous Achilles tenotomy and the foot-abduction brace to four to five years, the Pirani and Dimeglio severity scores, the idiopathic-versus-syndromic-versus-positional distinction, the relapse and the anterior tibialis tendon transfer, and the longitudinal, transverse, and digital congenital limb deficiencies.

20 marks30 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

RACP DWEMRCPCH TheoryABP General Pediatrics

Target exams

RACP DWEMRCPCH TheoryABP General Pediatrics
Prompt
A newborn boy is found on the routine baby check to have a right foot that is inverted, adducted, and plantarflexed, with a deep medial crease and a small heel in varus, and the deformity does not correct with gentle passive manipulation. The Pirani score is four out of six. Outline the four classical deformities of clubfoot, the Ponseti method from the first cast to the foot-abduction brace, the percutaneous Achilles tenotomy and its indications, and the management of the relapse, then discuss the classification of the congenital limb anomalies and the multidisciplinary disposition.

This child has the classic presentation of the idiopathic clubfoot, and the task is to outline the four classical deformities, the Ponseti method, the percutaneous tenotomy and the foot-abduction brace, the relapse and its management, and the broader family of the congenital limb anomalies. [1][5]

Question 1 (10 marks)

Outline the four classical deformities of clubfoot, the Ponseti method from the first cast to the foot-abduction brace, and the percutaneous Achilles tenotomy and its indications. [1]

A full-mark answer covers the CAVE mnemonic, the biomechanical sequence of the Ponseti method, the tenotomy at eight to ten weeks, and the foot-abduction brace to four to five years. [5]

The four classical deformities and the CAVE mnemonic (2 marks). The clubfoot, or the congenital talipes equinovarus, combines four deformities: the cavus (the high arch, the first ray plantarflexed), the adductus (the forefoot turned in, the medial displacement of the navicular and the cuboid), the varus (the heel turned in, the inversion of the calcaneus), and the equinus (the toes down, the plantarflexion contracture of the ankle). The mnemonic CAVE captures the deformities in the order the Ponseti method corrects them. The rigidity — the resistance to the passive correction — is the single feature that separates the structural clubfoot from the positional foot. [1][7]

The Ponseti method, casts one to five to seven (3 marks). The Ponseti method corrects the deformities in the cavus, adductus, varus, equinus sequence, using the viscoelastic creep of the immature ligament. The first cast corrects the cavus by elevating the first ray. The casts two to four or five correct the adductus and the varus together, by abducting the foot around the head of the talus — the fulcrum of the correction — with the counter-pressure on the lateral talar head. As the foot abducts, the navicular reduces onto the head of the talus, the calcaneus everts beneath the talus, and the cuboid aligns on the calcaneus. The casts are the long-leg above-knee casts, changed weekly, for a total of five to seven. The sequence is biomechanical: the talonavicular joint corrects before the ankle, because a premature dorsiflexion against a tight posterior capsule produces the rocker-bottom foot. [1][3]

The percutaneous Achilles tenotomy (2 marks). The percutaneous Achilles tenotomy is performed at eight to ten weeks, when the cavus, the adductus, and the varus are corrected but the equinus persists — typically when the Pirani hindfoot score is above one. The tenotomy is a minor procedure under the local anaesthetic or the sedation, with a small ophthalmic scalpel or a tenotomy needle, through a medial approach at the insertion or one centimetre above. It is performed in roughly eighty to ninety percent of the idiopathic clubfeet, and it releases the tight Achilles tendon that the casts cannot overcome. The post-tenotomy cast is worn for three weeks in the dorsiflexed position. [1][5]

The foot-abduction brace (2 marks). The foot-abduction brace is the shoes-and-bar device holding the affected foot at seventy degrees of external rotation (sixty to seventy for the affected, thirty to forty for the unaffected in the unilateral case) and fifteen degrees of dorsiflexion. It is worn full-time (twenty-three hours a day) for the first three months after the last cast, then nightly (twelve to fourteen hours, at the night and the nap) to the age of four to five years. The brace compliance, more than the casting or the tenotomy, is the single greatest determinant of the long-term success, and the family-centred counselling — the explanation of the rationale, the peer support, and the regular review — is the safeguard. [3]

The long-term outcome (1 mark). The Cooper and Dietz thirty-year follow-up showed the near-normal function, the painless feet, and only the minor strength deficits (about fifteen percent less calf strength) compared with the controls. The patient walks, runs, and plays sport without the limitation. [2]

Question 2 (10 marks)

Discuss the management of the relapsed clubfoot and the classification and the disposition of the congenital limb anomalies. [5]

A full-mark answer covers the relapse ladder, the anterior tibialis tendon transfer, and the classification of the congenital limb anomalies with the orthopaedic and the prosthetic disposition. [8]

The relapse and its causes (2 marks). The relapse is seen in twenty to thirty percent of the idiopathic clubfeet, and the most common cause is the brace non-compliance. The relapse presents as the recurrence of the equinus, the adductus, and the varus, often within the first two to three years after the last cast. The safeguard is the family-centred brace counselling, and the recognition that the early cessation of the brace is the commonest precipitant. [8][3]

The relapse ladder (3 marks). The first step in the relapsed clubfoot is the repeat Ponseti casting, with the five to seven casts and, often, a repeat percutaneous tenotomy. The dynamic supination — the foot that supinates on the swing phase of the gait, from the overpull of the anterior tibialis — is the relapse pattern that responds to the anterior tibialis tendon transfer, typically to the lateral cuneiform, performed at the age of two and a half to five years. The more extensive procedures — the posterior release, the posteromedial release, the talectomy — are reserved for the resistant few and the neglected clubfoot in the older child, and they carry the higher risk of the stiffness and the arthritis that the Ponseti method was designed to prevent. [8][5]

The classification of the congenital limb anomalies (3 marks). The congenital limb anomalies are classified into the longitudinal deficiencies (the failure of formation of a part of the limb across the long axis — the fibular hemimelia, the tibial hemimelia, the proximal femoral focal deficiency), the transverse deficiencies (the failure of formation across the short axis, or the constriction band — the congenital amputation, the amniotic band syndrome), and the digital anomalies (the failure of separation or the duplication of the digital rays — the polydactyly, the syndactyly). The fibular hemimelia presents with the short lower limb, the absent lateral rays, the valgus ankle. The tibial hemimelia presents with the short lower limb, the varus ankle, the flexed knee. The proximal femoral focal deficiency presents with the short thigh, the flexed hip, the leg-length discrepancy. The amniotic band syndrome presents with the constriction ring and the threatened distal ischaemia. The polydactyly presents with the extra digit, and the syndactyly with the fused digits. [5]

The multidisciplinary disposition (2 marks). The general paediatrician owns the newborn baby check, the referral, and the family counselling. The paediatric orthopaedic surgeon owns the casting, the tenotomy, the surgery, and the limb reconstruction. The physiotherapist owns the brace fitting and the follow-up. The prosthetist and the orthotist own the congenital limb anomalies and the brace fabrication. The geneticist owns the syndromic workup. The fibular hemimelia is managed by the limb-lengthening or the amputation (the Syme or the Boyd) and the prosthetic fitting, depending on the severity. The polydactyly is managed by the excision in the first one to two years. The syndactyly is managed by the surgical separation between the ages of six and eighteen months, with the border digits separated earlier. [5]

References

  1. [1]Ponseti IV. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1992.PMID 1548277
  2. [2]Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1995.PMID 7593056
  3. [3]Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics, 2004.PMID 14754952
  4. [5]Chu A, Lehman WB. Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot in the Ponseti Era and Beyond. Foot Ankle Clin, 2015.PMID 26589078
  5. [7]Canavese F, Dimeglio A. Clinical examination and classification systems of congenital clubfoot: a narrative review. Ann Transl Med, 2021.PMID 34423009
  6. [8]Masrouha K, Chu A, Lehman W. Narrative review of the management of a relapsed clubfoot. Ann Transl Med, 2021.PMID 34423014
  7. [10]Gerlach DJ, Gurnett CA, Limpaphayom N, Alaee F, et al. Early results of the Ponseti method for the treatment of clubfoot associated with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009.PMID 19487512