Paeds SAQs · fetal-neonatal-and-perinatal
Family-integrated developmental care in NICU
Short-answer questions on the FiCare model, the developmental care bundle, and the evidence supporting family-integrated neonatal care.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Question 1 (10 marks)
a) Distinguish between developmental care (NIDCAP), family-centred care, and Family Integrated Care (FiCare), defining the parental role in each. (4 marks) Developmental care (NIDCAP) modifies the environment and handling — dim and cycled light, noise below 45 dB, protected sleep, flexed containment, clustered care, procedural analgesia — with staff still delivering all hands-on care and the parent welcome but secondary. Family-centred care welcomes parents as partners with open visiting, kangaroo care, shared information, and a place on rounds, but staff still deliver most care and the parent remains an involved visitor. FiCare restructures the relationship so that parents are the primary caregivers for at least eight hours a day, with structured education, peer support, and presence on rounds, while the nurse shifts from carer to teacher and mentor. [2] [4]
b) Outline the core components of a FiCare programme as implemented in the O'Brien 2018 trial. (3 marks) The core components are: (i) parental presence at the cot-side for at least eight hours a day; (ii) a structured education programme of daily sessions over approximately four weeks covering feeding, safety, neurodevelopment, discharge readiness, and parent wellbeing; (iii) parents delivering hands-on care — feeds, nappies, observations, documentation, kangaroo care — under nursing mentorship; (iv) a parent peer-support group; and (v) parent participation on medical rounds and family-centred discharge planning. [1] [2]
c) State the primary and key secondary outcomes of the O'Brien 2018 multicentre cluster randomised trial and what they showed. (3 marks) The O'Brien 2018 trial randomised 26 tertiary NICUs across Canada, Australia, and New Zealand to FiCare or standard care. The primary outcome was weight-gain z-score change at day 21: −0.07 with FiCare versus −0.16 with standard care (p<0.0002), with higher average daily weight gain. Key secondary outcomes showed reduced parental stress and anxiety on the PSS:NICU and increased high-frequency exclusive breastmilk feeding at discharge, with no safety signal. [2]
Question 2 (10 marks)
a) Explain why the preterm brain is vulnerable to the standard NICU environment, naming three mechanisms. (3 marks) Between 23 and 34 weeks the brain is in its most plastic growth window (dendritic arborisation, synaptogenesis, subplate development), so it is highly disruptable. Three mechanisms link the NICU environment to harm: (i) immature cerebral autoregulation creates a pressure-passive circulation so handling and pain swings transmit directly to cerebral vessels, contributing to IVH and PVL; (ii) an immature HPA stress axis is upregulated by repeated pain and sleep fragmentation, driving sustained cortisol elevation that alters brain architecture; and (iii) sensory mismatch (bright light, loud noise, absent maternal regulation) disrupts the patterned input the brain expects. [4]
b) The mother in the stem describes fatigue and tearfulness with below-target infant weight gain. Outline your assessment and management of this situation within a FiCare programme. (4 marks) Assessment: confirm the weight-gain trajectory against the target of 15 to 20 g/kg/day for a preterm infant and exclude medical causes (sepsis, anaemia, feeding intolerance) before attributing it to the care model. Assess parental mental health with the PSS:NICU and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and observe the parent-infant relationship at the cot-side. Management: reinforce the developmental care bundle and cue-based feeding; expand kangaroo and skin-to-skin contact; review the education programme for competence gaps; mobilise the peer-support group; and, if depression or anxiety is identified, arrange mental-health and social-work support and relieve pressure on the parent to be present eight hours a day while she recovers. [2]
c) Describe how family-integrated developmental care should be adapted for a low- or middle-income setting, and the evidence that supports that adaptation. (3 marks) In low- and middle-income settings, kangaroo mother care is the evidence-based backbone of family-integrated care: continuous skin-to-skin contact, exclusive or nearly exclusive breastfeeding, and early discharge with close follow-up for stable infants under 2500 g. The 2016 Cochrane review found this reduces mortality at discharge and at 6 to 12 months and reduces sepsis, hypothermia, and length of stay. The full structured FiCare programme is harder to deliver where distance, accommodation, and income constrain prolonged in-hospital presence, so it is adapted rather than imported wholesale. [5]
References
- [1]O'Brien K, Bracht M, Macdonell K, et al A pilot cohort analytic study of Family Integrated Care in a Canadian neonatal intensive care unit BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2013.PMID 23445639
- [2]O'Brien K, Robson K, Bracht M, et al Effectiveness of Family Integrated Care in neonatal intensive care units on infant and parent outcomes: a multicentre, multinational, cluster-randomised controlled trial Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2018.PMID 30169298
- [3]Hei M, Gao X, Li T, et al Family Integrated Care for Preterm Infants in China: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial J Pediatr, 2021.PMID 32898578
- [4]Symington A, Pinelli J Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2006.PMID 16625548
- [5]Conde-Agudelo A, Díaz-Rossello JL Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016.PMID 27552521