Paeds SAQs · clinical-assessment-and-reasoning
Paediatric history and age-adapted consultation — formative SAQs
Two formative short-answer questions on age-adapted paediatric history, confidential adolescent interviewing, interpreters, teach-back and safety-netting.
On this page & tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Febrile toddler with caregiver concern (10 marks)
A 22-month-old is brought to the emergency department with fever. The caregiver says, “He is not himself.” Initial observations are only mildly abnormal. [10]
Questions
- Structure an age-adapted history for this encounter, including historians, key domains and how you protect observation while you talk. (4 marks) [2] [13]
- Explain how you would use caregiver concern in your problem representation and immediate plan. (3 marks) [10]
- Outline teach-back and safety-net content before discharge if the child improves and a period of community observation is judged safe. (3 marks) [7] [11]
Model answer
History structure (4). Multi-party greeting; child first if possible, then caregiver. Note reliability of historians. Parallel observation of appearance, work of breathing and interaction while taking history. Domains: timeline of fever and behaviour change; intake and wet nappies; rash, breathing, seizures; immunisations; past history; medications and antipyretic dosing; social supports and ability to re-present; what has already been tried; caregiver’s exact concern. Avoid leading questions. Use professional interpreter if language discordant. [5] [10]
Caregiver concern (3). Treat “not himself” as high-value data associated with critical illness risk in prospective work. Put baseline change into the one-sentence problem representation. Do not close early because first numbers look mild. Escalate assessment and observation threshold accordingly. [10]
Teach-back and safety-net (3). Explain working impression and plan in plain language. Ask caregiver to restate in their own words; correct gaps. Safety-net: specific red flags (breathing harder, fewer wet nappies, non-rousable, non-blanching rash, caregiver still worried), when to return, how to access care overnight, and time for planned review if appropriate. Provide written instructions when possible. [7] [11]
SAQ 2 — Adolescent confidential interview (10 marks)
A 16-year-old is seen for recurrent abdominal pain. You suspect a mixed biomedical and psychosocial agenda. [1] [2]
Questions
- How do you open confidential time and explain limits of confidentiality? (3 marks) [2] [3]
- Map HEADSS or SSHADESS onto this consultation without turning it into an interrogation. (4 marks) [1]
- What do you do if the young person discloses active suicidal intent with a plan? (3 marks) [3] [15]
Model answer
Opening confidential time (3). Explain why private time helps care. State limits before sensitive questions: ordinary private information stays private, but serious risk of harm to self or others, or other mandatory duties, require sharing. Invite caregiver out respectfully and agree how you will regroup. [1] [2] [3]
HEADSS/SSHADESS (4). Use as a scaffold. Start with less sensitive domains (home, school/strengths, activities), then substances, emotions/eating/depression, sexuality and safety. Prefer open questions and reflections. SSHADESS explicitly includes strengths and school. Do not machine-gun questions. Link findings to the abdominal pain agenda and follow-up. [1] [2]
Suicidal intent (3). Take it seriously. Ensure immediate safety. Do not promise secrecy. Involve appropriate senior, mental-health and caregiver supports according to local pathway and harm-prevention duties. Document and hand over clearly. [2] [3] [15]
References
- [1]Coble C Teaching SSHADESS Versus HEADSS to Medical Students: An Association With Improved Communication Skills and Increased Psychosocial Factor Assessments Acad Pediatr, 2023.PMID 36130691
- [2]Svetaz MV Adolescent Health: Communication With Adolescent Patients FP Essent, 2021.PMID 34410092
- [3]Katz AL Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 27456510
- [4]COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 27456514
- [5]Boylen S Impact of professional interpreters on outcomes for hospitalized children from migrant and refugee families with limited English proficiency: a systematic review JBI Evid Synth, 2020.PMID 32813387
- [6]Gutman CK Professional Interpreter Use and Discharge Communication in the Pediatric Emergency Department Acad Pediatr, 2018.PMID 30048713
- [7]Samuels-Kalow M Like a dialogue: Teach-back in the emergency department Patient Educ Couns, 2016.PMID 26597382
- [8]Naureckas Li C Medication Education for Dosing Safety: A Randomized Controlled Trial Ann Emerg Med, 2020.PMID 32807539
- [9]Samuels-Kalow ME Analysis of a Medication Safety Intervention in the Pediatric Emergency Department JAMA Netw Open, 2024.PMID 38214929
- [10]Mills E Association between caregiver concern for clinical deterioration and critical illness in children presenting to hospital: a prospective cohort study Lancet Child Adolesc Health, 2025.PMID 40451224
- [11]Burvenich R Effectiveness of safety-netting approaches for acutely ill children: a network meta-analysis Br J Gen Pract, 2025.PMID 39117428
- [12]Starmer AJ Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program N Engl J Med, 2014.PMID 25372088
- [13]Kuo DZ Recognition and Management of Medical Complexity Pediatrics, 2016.PMID 27940731
- [14]Davidson JE Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU Crit Care Med, 2017.PMID 27984278
- [15]Forkey H Trauma-Informed Care Pediatrics, 2021.PMID 34312292
- [16]Duffee J Trauma-Informed Care in Child Health Systems Pediatrics, 2021.PMID 34312294
- [17]Forkey H Trauma-Informed Strategies in Pediatric Primary Care Pediatr Clin North Am, 2024.PMID 39433381