Paeds SAQs · nephrology-urology-fluids-and-electrolytes
Urinalysis, renal function and paediatric kidney assessment — formative SAQs
Two formative short-answer questions on bedside Schwartz eGFR calculation and staging, urine collection method, dipstick interpretation and the creatinine lag in a sick child.
On this page & tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 — Bedside Schwartz eGFR and staging (10 marks)
A 6-year-old boy is 115 cm tall. His serum creatinine is 0.9 mg per dL, reported on a modern enzymatic assay. He is well, and the test was done as follow-up for an isolated abnormality found at screening. [1] [4]
Questions
-
State the bedside Schwartz equation in full with units, calculate this child's estimated GFR, and state the KDIGO category. (5 marks) [1] [4]
-
Explain why a measured height is essential, and what happens if the original 0.55 constant is used instead of 0.413. (3 marks) [1]
-
State one reason the estimate might be inaccurate despite correct arithmetic. (2 marks) [1]
Model answer
Calculation (5). The bedside Schwartz equation gives eGFR in mL per min per 1.73 m2 equal to 0.413 times height in cm divided by serum creatinine in mg per dL. That is 0.413 times 115 divided by 0.9, equal to 0.413 times 127.8, about 53 mL per min per 1.73 m2. A stable value of 53 falls in KDIGO category G3a, which covers 45 to 59 mL per min per 1.73 m2, and warrants nephrology referral. [1] [4]
Height and constant (3). Height replaces muscle mass in the equation, so a guessed height produces a guessed GFR. The original 0.55 constant, or 0.45 for infants, was derived with older creatinine assays that read higher than current enzymatic methods; using 0.55 today would overestimate the GFR and falsely reassure. [1]
Inaccuracy (2). Reduced muscle mass, such as in neuromuscular disease or cachexia, lowers creatinine generation and drifts the estimate upward; cystatin C would then be a better cross-check. [1]
SAQ 2 — Urine collection, dipstick and the creatinine lag (10 marks)
A febrile 18-month-old is not yet toilet-trained. A bag-urine culture grows a mixed growth of coliforms. Separately, a dehydrated, oliguric 4-year-old has a serum creatinine within the reference range. [3] [5]
Questions
-
Explain why the bag-urine result cannot be used to confirm urinary tract infection, and state the preferred collection method. (4 marks) [3] [6]
-
Describe how to read the dipstick and microscopy together to localise the source of a positive blood result. (3 marks) [2]
-
Explain why a normal serum creatinine does not exclude acute kidney injury in the oliguric child, and state the safer approach. (3 marks) [5]
Model answer
Bag urine (4). Bag urine carries a high contamination rate, so a mixed growth of coliforms more often reflects perineal skin flora than true infection. For diagnosis where the result changes treatment, use clean-catch, catheterisation or suprapubic aspiration, which cut contamination. Comparison of catheter and clean-catch samples in preschool children shows acceptable and similar results when the technique is good. [3] [6]
Dipstick and microscopy (3). The blood pad is positive for intact red cells, free haemoglobin or myoglobin, so the strip alone cannot localise the source. Microscopy separates them: dysmorphic red cells and red cell casts point to the glomerulus, while normal red cells point to the lower tract. The dipstick raises the hypothesis and the sediment confirms it. [2]
Creatinine lag (3). Creatinine rises only after filtration has already fallen and muscle has had time to load the blood, so a single normal value under-represents early injury. The safer approach is to treat the urine output and trend the creatinine over hours to days, while managing the cause and the fluid and electrolyte state. [5]
References
- [1]Schwartz GJ, et al New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD J Am Soc Nephrol, 2009.PMID 19158356
- [2]Simerville JA, et al Urinalysis: a comprehensive review Am Fam Physician, 2005.PMID 15791892
- [3]Whiting P, et al Rapid tests and urine sampling techniques for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in children under five years: a systematic review BMC Pediatr, 2005.PMID 15811182
- [4]Stevens PE, et al Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline Ann Intern Med, 2013.PMID 23732715
- [5]Hessey E, et al Evaluation of height-dependent and height-independent methods of estimating baseline serum creatinine in critically ill children Pediatr Nephrol, 2017.PMID 28523356
- [6]Bogie AL, et al Is There a Difference in the Contamination Rates of Urine Samples Obtained by Bladder Catheterization and Clean-Catch Collection in Preschool Children? Pediatr Emerg Care, 2021.PMID 34772880