Paeds SAQs · clinical-assessment-and-reasoning
Weight loss in children and adolescents — formative SAQs
Formative SAQs on paediatric and adolescent weight-loss assessment.
On this page & tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 (10)
A 15-year-old has lost 10 kg (about 12% of premorbid weight) over five months. BMI remains on the 35th percentile. Resting heart rate is 46/min with orthostatic dizziness. The young person describes fear of fatness and compulsive running. Caregivers thought the BMI chart was reassuring. [1] [2]
- State the problem representation and explain why BMI percentile alone is insufficient. (3) [1] [2]
- List immediate medical assessment priorities and admission-oriented risk features. (3) [2] [6]
- Outline a stepwise management plan including refeeding awareness and multidisciplinary care. (4) [2] [4] [1]
Model answer
Problem representation. Adolescent with large percentage weight loss, bradycardia and body-image-driven restriction — medically significant restrictive eating (atypical anorexia pattern possible despite non-low BMI). BMI band does not cancel percent loss or physiology. [1] [2]
Medical priorities. ABCDE if unwell; resting HR, orthostatic vitals, temperature; electrolytes including phosphate/Mg/K; ECG as indicated; suicide/safety screen; quantify percent loss. Admission-oriented features: bradycardia, orthostasis, electrolyte abnormality, medical instability, suicidality, failed outpatient care, rapid ongoing loss. [2] [6]
Plan. Medical stabilisation pathway if unstable; supervised nutrition restart with refeeding monitoring principles (PO4/K/Mg); dietetic and family-based/mental-health pathway in parallel; clear follow-up and safety-net; avoid shaming. [2] [4] [1]
SAQ 2 (10)
A 10-year-old has lost 2.5 kg over 4 weeks with polyuria, polydipsia and new bedwetting. Another child in the same clinic has weight loss with nocturnal diarrhoea and mouth ulcers. [3] [5]
- For the first child, what is the critical immediate test and why? (3) [3]
- For the second child, what organic pathway ranks highly and what next steps follow? (3) [5]
- Explain how intentional restriction and organic disease must both stay open in mixed presentations. (4) [1] [5]
Model answer
First child. Point-of-care glucose now (with DKA assessment if unwell). Polyuria–polydipsia–weight loss is new diabetes until proven otherwise; delay risks DKA progression. [3]
Second child. Inflammatory bowel disease ranks high with nocturnal stools, oral ulcers and weight loss. Next: directed history/examination, inflammatory markers/faecal tests as indicated, and gastroenterology pathway rather than endless symptomatic labels. [5]
Both open. Restriction can coexist with organic disease (pain-driven intake drop in IBD; body-image issues after illness). Keep glucose/gut/endocrine red flags active even when psychology is obvious, and keep mental-health support active even when an organic diagnosis is found. [1] [5]
References
- [1]Hornberger LL Identification and Management of Eating Disorders in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 2021.PMID 33386343
- [2]Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine Medical Management of Restrictive Eating Disorders in Adolescents and Young Adults. The Journal of adolescent health, 2022.PMID 36058805
- [3]Veauthier B Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Evaluation and Treatment. American family physician, 2024.PMID 39556629
- [4]da Silva JSV ASPEN Consensus Recommendations for Refeeding Syndrome. Nutrition in clinical practice, 2020.PMID 32115791
- [5]Rosen MJ Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children and Adolescents. JAMA pediatrics, 2015.PMID 26414706
- [6]Trapani S Medical Complications of Anorexia Nervosa. Pediatrics, 2025.PMID 40659363