Paeds SAQs · pain-palliative-and-end-of-life-care
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment — formative SAQs
Formative SAQs on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment covering definition, classification, bedside pathway, red flags, documentation and family support.
On this page & tools
Target exams
SAQ 1 (10)
A six-month-old infant with severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy remains ventilator-dependent after a catastrophic out-of-hospital arrest. The intensive-care team judges that continued invasive support is not in the child's best interests; the parents ask that "everything be done". [1] [2]
a) Define the core problem in one sentence and state the governing ethical standard. (3 marks) [1]
b) Outline the classification axes you would use and why they change management. (3 marks) [1] [2]
c) List the red flags that would force senior, ethics or court escalation. (2 marks) [1]
d) Document the key elements you would write in the clinical record after the family meeting. (2 marks) [2]
SAQ 2 (10)
The family remains uncertain and a junior colleague asks whether stopping a treatment already started is ethically worse than never starting it. A sibling is present and distressed. [1] [3]
a) Explain the ethical relationship between withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. (3 marks) [1]
b) Describe how you would structure shared decision-making so parents are not left to decide alone. (3 marks) [1] [2]
c) Outline immediate symptom-control priorities while the decision is being made. (2 marks) [2]
d) Describe age-adapted support for the sibling during this phase. (2 marks) [3]
References
- [1]Larcher V et al. Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice. Arch Dis Child, 2015.PMID 25802250
- [2]Himelstein BP et al. Pediatric palliative care. N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15103002
- [3]Dworetz AR et al. Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in extremely low gestational age neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2021.PMID 33082153
- [4]Gillam L et al. How Could Parents' Reasons Shift a Refusal of Treatment into the Zone of Parental Discretion?. Am J Bioeth, 2025.PMID 41108243
- [5]Vemuri S et al. Conceptualising paediatric advance care planning: a qualitative phenomenological study of paediatricians caring for children with life-limiting conditions in Australia. BMJ Open, 2022.PMID 35577468
- [6]Horridge KA et al. Advance Care Planning: practicalities, legalities, complexities and controversies. Arch Dis Child, 2015.PMID 25275088