Paeds Vivas · adolescent-and-young-adult-medicine
Adolescent consultation, HEEADSSS and confidentiality — branching viva
Branching structured oral on visit structure, time alone, conditional confidentiality, HEEADSSS domains, validated screens, a suicide disclosure, a portal breach, and transition.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Stem
The examiner will test whether you can run a youth-friendly, confidential adolescent consultation under pressure, and act on what you find. [1] [4]
Branch 1 — Visit structure
Examiner: How do you open an adolescent consultation? [3]
Strong answer: Greet the young person first, by name, before the parent. Set a joint agenda. Introduce private time as a normal part of the visit. Do not take the sensitive history with the parent answering. [3] [2]
Examiner: Give your confidentiality line. [4]
Strong answer: Conditional confidentiality — what we discuss is private unless there is serious risk of harm to self or others, abuse or assault, or a legal duty to act. Say it up front, to both the young person and the parent, and offer to plan any override with the young person first. [2] [4]
Branch 2 — HEEADSSS
Examiner: Recite the eight HEEADSSS domains with one open question each. [1]
Strong answer: Home, Education/Employment, Eating, Activities, Drugs, Sexuality, Suicide/mood, Safety. One open, non-judgemental question each, without assuming partner gender, orientation or activity. Note the original HEADSS (Cohen 1991) and the Eating and Safety expansion. [1]
Branch 3 — Screens
Examiner: A depression screen is positive — what next? [5]
Strong answer: Same-visit suicide-risk assessment and a disposition decision. Do not file for delayed review. Decide crisis pathway versus early review with a written safety plan based on ideation, plan, intent, means, prior attempts and protective factors. [5]
Examiner: What is CRAFFT for? [6]
Strong answer: A validated screen for adolescent substance-use risk. A positive result triggers further assessment and brief advice, not an automatic diagnosis or a reflex urine drug screen. [6]
Branch 4 — Emergency disclosure
Examiner: The 16-year-old discloses active suicidal intent for tonight and begs you not to tell anyone. [5] [4]
Strong answer: Active intent is a confidentiality override. Secure immediate safety, do not leave them alone, use the local crisis or emergency pathway, explain what must be shared and why, and share the minimum necessary. Do not keep an unsafe promise of secrecy. [4] [5]
Branch 5 — Systems and transition
Examiner: The contraception note will show on the parent's portal. [8]
Strong answer: Open-notes and portal transparency are a modern confidentiality risk. Use sensitive-note workflows, confidential contact details, and billing codes that do not betray content. Know your local portal controls and use them. [8] [4]
Examiner: A 17-year-old with a chronic disease has no adult provider. [7]
Strong answer: Transition is prepare–transfer–integrate in the medical home over years — assess readiness, build a portable summary, plan the move to adult care — not a birthday referral letter. [7]
Examiner extras
- Time alone is clinical quality, not optional courtesy. [3]
- The same-visit response to a positive screen is the pass/fail discriminator. [5]
- Never use a same-language family member as interpreter for sensitive disclosures. [4]
- Capacity to consent is assessed issue-by-issue, not by a single universal age. [4]
References
- [1]Cohen E HEADSS, a psychosocial risk assessment instrument: implications for designing effective intervention programs for runaway youth. Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 1991.PMID 1772892
- [2]Ford CA Delivery of confidentiality assurances to adolescents by primary care physicians. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 1997.PMID 9158445
- [3]Miller VA Adolescents Spending Time Alone With Pediatricians During Routine Visits: Perspectives of Parents in a Primary Care Clinic. The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2018.PMID 29887486
- [4]Chung RJ Confidentiality in the Care of Adolescents: Policy Statement. Pediatrics, 2024.PMID 38646690
- [5]US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Depression and Suicide Risk in Children and Adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA, 2022.PMID 36219440
- [6]Knight JR Validity of the CRAFFT substance abuse screening test among adolescent clinic patients. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 2002.PMID 12038895
- [7]White PH Supporting the Health Care Transition From Adolescence to Adulthood in the Medical Home. Pediatrics, 2018.PMID 30348754
- [8]Pasternak RH 21st Century Cures Act ONC Rule: Implications for Adolescent Care and Confidentiality Protections. Pediatrics, 2023.PMID 37010402