Paeds Vivas · growth-development-and-behaviour
AAC and assistive technology — branching viva
Structured oral on early AAC, PECS/SGD evidence, seating/access, powered mobility and hospital communication safety.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Opening (2–3 minutes)
Examiner: How will you open this consultation? [13]
Strong answer: Ask the family’s goals for what the child needs to communicate this month. Validate worry about speech. State that AAC is multi-modal and can run with speech attempts. Map current means and failure points at home and preschool. [2] [13]
Branch A — Myth and evidence
Examiner: They insist AAC stops talking. Evidence? [1]
Strong answer: PECS meta-analysis supports requesting; speech effects are limited/variable — I will not over-promise fluent speech. Naturalistic SGD and preschool SGD reviews support early aided communication for participation. Waiting for speech failure costs relationships and behaviour regulation. [1] [2] [3]
Branch B — Assessment
Examiner: What will you assess before buying a device? [14]
Strong answer: Participation goals; comprehension vs expression; vision/hearing; posture and hand/switch/eye-gaze access; partner skills; school context. Feature-match after team assessment, then trial. [14]
Branch C — Seating and abandonment
Examiner: A prior tablet failed. Next step? [11]
Strong answer: Re-check seating and access; train school and family; re-trial with low-tech backup; do not label the child incapable after a single unsupported demo. [11] [13] [14]
Branch D — Powered mobility
Examiner: When would you discuss powered mobility? [9]
Strong answer: For severe motor impairment limiting exploration; frame as potential developmental/participation intervention with therapy-led trial, not only late transport. [9]
Branch E — Hospital safety
Examiner: The child is admitted tonight. Communication plan? [13]
Strong answer: Bring device; document yes/no and pain signals; low-tech board for core needs if high-tech unavailable; never leave the child without a communication channel. [13]
Examiner scoring cues
Pass: early multi-modal AAC; honest PECS/SGD evidence; feature-match and training; seating/access; participation outcomes; hospital backup. [1] [2] [13]
Fail: wait-for-speech-only advice; device-first shopping; ignore seating; confiscate AAC without alternative; promise fluent speech from PECS alone. [1] [11] [13]
References
- [1]Flippin M Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on communication and speech for children with autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. American journal of speech-language pathology, 2010.PMID 20181849
- [2]Gevarter C Naturalistic Speech-Generating Device Interventions for Children With Complex Communication Needs: A Systematic Review of Single-Subject Studies. American journal of speech-language pathology, 2018.PMID 29971336
- [3]Therrien MCS A Systematic review of AAC interventions using speech generating devices for autistic preschoolers. Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 2025.PMID 40164143
- [9]Logan SW Powered Mobility Device Use and Developmental Change of Young Children with Cerebral Palsy. Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023.PMID 37232636
- [11]Acharya BD Effect of Adaptive Seating Systems on Postural Control and Activity Performance: A Systematic Review. Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association, 2023.PMID 37747975
- [13]Resina P Identifying and Describing Best Clinical Practices for Children and Adolescents With Complex Communication Needs: A Scoping Review of Healthcare-Based Interventions. Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2025.PMID 40745993
- [14]Coan-Brill J Exploring augmentative & alternative communication assessment practices for children with limited functional speech & motor skills: a scoping review utilizing the Participation Model of AAC. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2025.PMID 39891921