Paeds Vivas · growth-development-and-behaviour
Behavioural management of defiance and oppositional behaviours — branching viva
Branching viva on ODD formulation, coercive cycles, parent training, ADHD comorbidity, medication boundaries and safeguarding.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Stem
The examiner starts with a 7-year-old referred for defiance at home and school, then adds ADHD features, a waitlist for parent training, and a safeguarding concern. [4]
Branch 1 — Definition and banding
Examiner: What is oppositional defiant disorder, and how do you separate it from normal noncompliance and from conduct disorder? [4]
Strong answer: ODD is a persistent pattern of angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behaviour and vindictiveness with impairment, typically lasting months rather than days. Normative noncompliance is age-expected, limited and less impairing. Conduct disorder adds aggression to people or animals, property destruction, deceit/theft or serious rule violations. ODD can precede CD but is not the same. [4]
Examiner: Name Stringaris’s dimensions and why they matter. [2]
Strong answer: Irritable, headstrong and hurtful. They have different longitudinal predictions — irritability more toward internalising pathways; headstrong/hurtful more toward externalising/conduct risk — so follow-up targets differ. [2]
Branch 2 — Mechanism
Examiner: Explain the coercive family cycle in plain registrar language. [9]
Strong answer: Parent gives a demand; child refuses or escalates; parent withdraws the demand or explodes. The child escapes the demand in the short term, so noncompliance is reinforced. The parent feels defeated and becomes harsher or more avoidant. Parent training targets those contingencies. [9]
Branch 3 — First-line treatment
Examiner: What is first-line treatment and what evidence do you cite? [5] [11]
Strong answer: Behavioural parent training with active practice. Scott’s multicentre BMJ trial showed parenting groups work in real clinical practice. Kaminski’s meta-analysis highlights positive parent–child interaction, consistent discipline, emotional communication and practice with the child. Programme families include Oregon-model lineage, Incredible Years-type groups and PCIT for younger children. [5] [11]
Examiner: The parent training waitlist is six months. What do you do this month? [5]
Strong answer: Interim coached skills in clinic/telehealth, written simple plan, school consistency, safety plan, and advocacy for earlier access. Do not default to antipsychotic for mild defiance because of a waitlist. [5] [6]
Branch 4 — ADHD comorbidity
Examiner: School describes impulsivity, incomplete work and motor restlessness as well as talking back. How does that change care? [18]
Strong answer: Assess for ADHD properly and treat if confirmed using paediatric ADHD guidance (Wolraich). Treating ADHD often reduces secondary oppositional symptoms. Continue parent training for residual coercive patterns. [18] [6]
Branch 5 — Medication limits
Examiner: When, if ever, would you consider medication for disruptive/aggressive behaviour? [6]
Strong answer: After psychosocial measures, for severe aggression in specialist pathways, often after ADHD is treated. Canadian Gorman guidance emphasises selective use and monitoring. Risperidone has RCT evidence in specific disruptive populations under specialist care. Avoid benzodiazepines as behaviour management. Mild ODD arguing alone is not an antipsychotic indication. [6]
Branch 6 — Trajectory and intensity
Examiner: What is Moffitt’s dual taxonomy and when do you escalate intensity? [8] [12]
Strong answer: Life-course-persistent versus adolescence-limited antisocial pathways. Early multi-problem onset with ADHD and adversity needs earlier multi-system intensity. Severe complex CD may need MST-type ecological interventions (Henggeler). [8] [12]
Branch 7 — Safeguarding
Examiner: During history the mother discloses partner violence and the child is hit “when he won’t listen.” What now? [4]
Strong answer: Protect first. Follow mandatory reporting and safety planning. Do not run a pure compliance curriculum that increases risk. Behaviour formulation continues only inside a safety frame. [4]
Closing pearl
Examiner: One sentence for the notes. [4]
Strong answer: Multi-informant ODD-range formulation with coercive-cycle maintainers; parent training and school plan first-line; ADHD screen/treat; no antipsychotic for mild defiance; safety net for escalation and safeguarding. [4] [5] [18]
References
- [4]Steiner H Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with oppositional defiant disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2007.PMID 17195736
- [5]Scott S Multicentre controlled trial of parenting groups for childhood antisocial behaviour in clinical practice. BMJ, 2001.PMID 11473908
- [6]Gorman DA Canadian guidelines on pharmacotherapy for disruptive and aggressive behaviour in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, or conduct disorder. Can J Psychiatry, 2015.PMID 25886657
- [8]Moffitt TE Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev, 1993.PMID 8255953
- [9]Dishion T The Oregon Model of Behavior Family Therapy: From Intervention Design to Promoting Large-Scale System Change. Behav Ther, 2016.PMID 27993335
- [11]Kaminski JW A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 2008.PMID 18205039
- [12]Henggeler SW Multisystemic Therapy: Clinical Overview, Outcomes, and Implementation Research. Fam Process, 2016.PMID 27370172
- [18]Wolraich ML Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 2019.PMID 31570648
- [2]Stringaris A Three dimensions of oppositionality in youth. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2009.PMID 19166573