Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Vivasgrowth-development-and-behaviour

Paeds Vivas · growth-development-and-behaviour

General movements and HINE — branching viva

Viva on GMs, HINE, combined early detection and family communication.

branching clinical structured oral
On this page & tools

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH Clinical

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH Clinical
Prompt
Neonatal follow-up: 4-month corrected-age high-risk infant with motor concerns; trained GMs and HINE available.

Branch A — Definitions

Examiner: What are general movements and what is HINE?
Candidate: General movements are spontaneous whole-body movements assessed qualitatively for fluency, variability and age-typical fidgety character using Prechtl’s trained method. HINE is a structured scored neurological examination of the infant that yields an optimality profile. [4] [5] [6]

Branch B — Timing

Examiner: When do you look for fidgety movements?
Candidate: In the fidgety window, roughly 9–20 weeks post-term age, often around three to five months corrected, in a quiet alert state—not during continuous crying or deep sleep. I use corrected age for preterm infants. [4] [5]

Branch C — High-risk findings

Examiner: Which GMs findings worry you most?
Candidate: Cramped-synchronised patterns in the writhing period and absent fidgety movements in the fidgety period, when scored by trained assessors. Abnormal fidgety quality also raises concern for later neurological dysfunction pathways. [4] [5] [14]

Branch D — Combining tools

Examiner: Why not rely on one tool?
Candidate: Predictive performance for early CP detection in high-risk infants is stronger when neuroimaging, GMs and neurological examination are combined. A single early normal exam does not erase residual high risk. [1] [2] [3]

Branch E — Action

Examiner: Tools converge toward high probability. What now?
Candidate: I use high-probability cerebral palsy language, start early intervention per 0–2 year guidance, arrange serial review, and continue investigations in parallel. I do not wait for independent walking. [1] [10] [16]

Branch F — Pitfalls

Examiner: What mistakes fail candidates?
Candidate: Untrained video scoring, wrong behavioural state, inventing HINE cut-offs without age context, false reassurance, and delaying therapy for absolute certainty. [4] [6] [8] [12]

Branch G — Communication

Examiner: Counsel the parents.
Candidate: I explain what we filmed and examined, what high probability means, what we will do this week, and that labels refine as the child grows. Plain language, teach-back, written plan, no catastrophic certainty and no false reassurance. [1] [12] [18]

Examiner traps

  • Waiting until walking age despite converging tools.
  • Treating GMs as untrained “eyeballing.”
  • Quoting a universal HINE cut-off without source.
  • Discharging high residual risk after one normal early exam. [1] [3] [8]

References

  1. [1]Novak I Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA pediatrics, 2017.PMID 28715518
  2. [2]Bosanquet M A systematic review of tests to predict cerebral palsy in young children. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2013.PMID 23574478
  3. [3]Morgan C The Pooled Diagnostic Accuracy of Neuroimaging, General Movements, and Neurological Examination for Diagnosing Cerebral Palsy Early in High-Risk Infants: A Case Control Study. Journal of clinical medicine, 2019.PMID 31694305
  4. [4]Prechtl HF State of the art of a new functional assessment of the young nervous system. An early predictor of cerebral palsy. Early human development, 1997.PMID 9467689
  5. [5]Einspieler C Cerebral Palsy: Early Markers of Clinical Phenotype and Functional Outcome. Journal of clinical medicine, 2019.PMID 31590221
  6. [6]Haataja L Optimality score for the neurologic examination of the infant at 12 and 18 months of age. The Journal of pediatrics, 1999.PMID 10431108
  7. [7]Romeo DM Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in infants born at term: Predicting outcomes other than cerebral palsy. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2022.PMID 35201619
  8. [8]Fehlings D The Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exam Scoring Aid supports early detection for infants with high probability of cerebral palsy. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2024.PMID 38818710
  9. [9]Romeo DM Neurological assessment tool for screening infants during the first year after birth: The Brief-Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination. Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2024.PMID 38287208
  10. [10]Morgan C Early Intervention for Children Aged 0 to 2 Years With or at High Risk of Cerebral Palsy: International Clinical Practice Guideline Based on Systematic Reviews. JAMA pediatrics, 2021.PMID 33999106
  11. [12]Te Velde A Age of Diagnosis, Fidelity and Acceptability of an Early Diagnosis Clinic for Cerebral Palsy: A Single Site Implementation Study. Brain sciences, 2021.PMID 34439692
  12. [14]Einspieler C Are abnormal fidgety movements an early marker for complex minor neurological dysfunction at puberty? Early human development, 2007.PMID 17129688
  13. [16]Kwong AK Early high risk of cerebral palsy classification is predictive of cerebral palsy at 2 years: an implementation cohort study. Archives of disease in childhood, 2025.PMID 40877021
  14. [18]Rosenbaum P A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Developmental medicine and child neurology. Supplement, 2007.PMID 17370477