Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Vivasinvestigations-procedures-and-technology

Paeds Vivas · investigations-procedures-and-technology

Genetic and metabolic test selection — branching viva

Branching viva on the request-side act of choosing and interpreting genetic and metabolic tests: applying the microarray-first consensus, escalating to exome, defending rapid whole-genome sequencing in the NICU, the timing of newborn bloodspot screening, the metabolic window, and the consent for an incidental actionable secondary finding.

branching clinical structured oral
On this page & tools

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
Outpatient clinic: a 4-year-old with global developmental delay and a normal microarray is referred back to you. The examiner asks what you do next, why trio sampling matters, how you would defend rapid whole-genome sequencing in a critically ill neonate, how you explain the timing of a heel-prick, and how you counsel a family for an incidental secondary finding.

Opening question

This 4-year-old with global developmental delay and mild dysmorphism has a normal chromosomal microarray from a year ago. Both parents are available and willing to provide blood. Walk me through your next genetic test of choice, the platform, the sample strategy, and why you would not repeat the microarray or send a karyotype. [1] [2]

Branch 1 — why the trio matters

You have chosen trio whole-exome sequencing. Explain to me why a trio sample is preferred over proband-only, what signal the trio unlocks, and by roughly how much it changes the diagnostic yield. Tell me what you would do if only one parent were available. [2]

Branch 2 — the critically ill infant

Step sideways to the NICU. A term infant presents at 48 hours with hypotonia, intractable seizures and an uninformative septic and metabolic screen. Defend the choice of rapid whole-genome sequencing over sequential single-gene testing in this infant, and quote the diagnostic yield and the management impact from the evidence. [8]

Branch 3 — the heel-prick and the abnormal screen

Back to the maternity unit. A term neonate's newborn bloodspot screen returns a markedly elevated octanoylcarnitine. Explain why the screen is taken at 48 to 72 hours, why the screen is not a diagnosis, and the confirmatory diagnostic pathway you would now run. Tell me what counts as a poorly taken spot. [12]

Branch 4 — the incidental finding and consent

The exome on your original 4-year-old returns a pathogenic variant in BRCA1, reported as an incidental actionable secondary finding. Tell me what consent should have been taken before the test, how you would counsel the family now, and whether and when you would test this child's siblings. Name the policy that governs the reportable genes. [11]

Closing — the five-step framework

Step back. Give me the five-step framework you would apply to any genetic or metabolic test request — justify, choose, sample, consent, cascade — and tell me how each step prevents the avoidable harms in this topic. [1] [12]

References

  1. [1]Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies Am J Hum Genet, 2010.PMID 20466091
  2. [2]Yang Y, Muzny DM, Reid JG, et al Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 24088041
  3. [8]Petrikin JE, Cakici JA, Clark MM, et al The NSIGHT1-randomized controlled trial: rapid whole-genome sequencing for accelerated etiologic diagnosis in critically ill infants NPJ Genom Med, 2018.PMID 29449963
  4. [11]Miller DT, Lee K, Abul-Husn NS, et al ACMG SF v3.2 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Genet Med, 2023.PMID 37347242
  5. [12]Marsden D, Larson C, Levy HL Newborn screening for metabolic disorders J Pediatr, 2006.PMID 16737864