Paeds Vivas · professional-practice-and-evidence
Paediatric consultation with child, young person and family — branching viva
Structured oral on the triadic, developmentally-adapted paediatric consultation: Calgary-Cambridge structure, the age ladder, adolescent confidentiality and HEEADSSS, breaking bad news, and safety-netting.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Opening
A paediatric consultation is a triad — clinician, child and family — and the child is a person and an informant, not a prop. I structure every encounter with Calgary-Cambridge, adapted to developmental stage, and I hear the child's voice alongside the parental account before I close. [1] [2]
Branch A — the 3-year-old
The parent is the primary historian. I observe the child through play and on the parent's lap, assess alertness and work of breathing, and manage stranger anxiety with a toy and short, concrete reassurance. I build rapport before any examination, then sequence from least to most invasive, leaving ears and throat until last so the child learns to trust me through the easy parts first. [1]
Branch B — the 14-year-old
I frame confidentiality and its limits up front, then offer the young person time alone. In private I run a HEEADSSS psychosocial screen — home, education, eating, activities, drugs, sexuality, suicide and depression, safety — which surfaces risks no parent-present history reveals. I respect emerging autonomy and capacity, and a participatory style raises engagement and visit satisfaction. [3] [1]
Branch C — the complex-chronic 8-year-old
The child is both patient and experienced self-advocate. I elicit her own words about symptoms and goals, gather the parental ideas, concerns and expectations, and coordinate across the multiple teams already involved. I name a key contact, write a plain-language plan, and avoid dumping new targets on a family already carrying a heavy service load. [2]
Difficult conversations
For breaking bad news I use SPIKES — setting, perception, invitation, knowledge, emotions, strategy and summary — adapted to the child's developmental level. I tell the truth in words the child can hold and keep the dialogue open, rather than delivering a single devastating sentence or agreeing to deception. [4]
Closure
Whatever the age, I close with teach-back, an explicit and documented safety-net — what to watch for, when, and where to return — and a named follow-up. A well-structured consultation is a safety intervention, not a soft skill: it improves disclosure, adherence and recall, and reduces complaint. [1] [2]
References
- [1]Levetown M and American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics Communicating with children and families: from everyday interactions to skill in conveying distressing information. Pediatrics, 2008.PMID 18450887
- [2]Howells RJ, Davies HA, Silverman JD, Archer JC, Mellon AF Assessment of doctors' consultation skills in the paediatric setting: the Paediatric Consultation Assessment Tool. Archives of disease in childhood, 2010.PMID 19019880
- [3]Ho J, Fong CK, Iskander A, Towns S, Steinbeck K Digital psychosocial assessment: An efficient and effective screening tool. Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2020.PMID 31883286
- [4]Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. The oncologist, 2000.PMID 10964998