Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Vivasgenetics-dysmorphology-and-metabolism

Paeds Vivas · genetics-dysmorphology-and-metabolism

Prenatal diagnosis and reproductive genetics — branching viva

Branching viva from a positive cell-free DNA screen through microarray interpretation, variant of uncertain significance reasoning, consanguinity and PGT-M counselling, and the paediatrician's role in translating genotype to postnatal plan.

branching clinical structured oral
On this page & tools

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

RACP General PaediatricsRACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
You are the paediatric registrar on the fetal medicine multidisciplinary round. A patient has a positive cell-free DNA screen. The examiner releases information in stages about diagnostic testing, microarray interpretation, variant of uncertain significance reasoning, consanguinity and reproductive options, and the paediatrician's planning role.

Station opening

Examiner: "The cell-free DNA screen is positive for trisomy 21 at high probability. The patient asks whether the baby has Down syndrome. What do you say?" [3]

Strong candidate (must-hit)

  • A positive cfDNA screen is a screen, not a confirmed diagnosis. It raises probability and warrants counselling and an offer of diagnostic testing (CVS or amniocentesis by gestation). [3]
  • Separates screening from diagnosis explicitly and states that confirmation is needed before any management decision. [3]
  • Quotes contemporary, not legacy, procedure-related miscarriage risk for the diagnostic procedure. [4]

Weak candidate

  • "Your baby has Down syndrome." [3]
  • Offers a repeat cfDNA screen instead of diagnostic testing when pre-test probability is high. [3]

Branch A — Choosing the diagnostic test and the first-tier laboratory test

Examiner: "The patient consents to amniocentesis. What laboratory test do you request on the sample, and why?" [1]

Strong

  • Requests chromosomal microarray as the first-tier test, because the anatomy scan shows a cardiac anomaly and microarray detects copy-number variants that karyotype misses. [1]
  • Cites the Wapner trial: microarray identified clinically significant CNVs in approximately 6% of structurally abnormal fetuses with a normal karyotype. [1]
  • Explains what microarray cannot detect: balanced rearrangements, low-level mosaicism, and single-nucleotide variants. [6]

Weak

  • "A karyotype is the standard test." [1]
  • Cannot explain the resolution difference between karyotype and microarray. [6]

Branch B — A variant of uncertain significance

Examiner: "The microarray returns, not a trisomy, but a variant of uncertain significance — a copy-number variant of unknown clinical significance. How do you counsel the family?" [6]

Strong

  • States that a VUS is a real finding whose clinical meaning is genuinely not yet established by the scientific community — it is neither pathogenic nor benign. [6]
  • Offers parental testing: if the VUS is inherited from an unaffected parent, incomplete penetrance is more likely; if de novo, it is more likely to be significant. [1]
  • Plans database review (ClinGen, ClinVar), phenotype matching, and periodic reanalysis as knowledge accumulates. [6]
  • Does not let the VUS drive irreversible decisions without further clarification. [6]

Weak

  • "It is probably nothing, don't worry about it." [6]
  • "This finding means your baby will have developmental delay." [6]

Branch C — Consanguinity and reproductive options

Examiner: "A different couple are first cousins and have had one child die of an undiagnosed neurodegenerative disorder. They are pregnant again. What reproductive options can you discuss?" [8]

Strong

  • Estimates empirical recurrence risk: approximately 1 in 4 per pregnancy for an autosomal recessive condition, with first-cousin couples carrying an additional 2–3% excess risk above baseline. [7]
  • Outlines the strategy to identify the gene: autozygosity mapping plus exome or genome sequencing using DNA from the affected child or both parents. [11]
  • Presents the reproductive menu: PGT-M (IVF, embryo biopsy, testing for the familial mutation, transfer of unaffected embryos), prenatal diagnosis (CVS or amniocentesis with targeted testing) each pregnancy, donor gametes, and acceptance of risk. [8]
  • Counsels honestly that PGT-M does not guarantee a live birth and that many programmes recommend prenatal confirmation. [8]

Weak

  • "Consanguinity always causes problems; do not have more children." [7]
  • Offers PGT-M without explaining the IVF requirement, cumulative cost or the allele drop-out limitation. [8]

Branch D — Confined placental mosaicism on CVS

Examiner: "Another patient had a CVS that reported mosaicism for trisomy 21. Is the fetus affected?" [4]

Strong

  • CVS samples placental trophoblast, not fetal cells. Mosaicism on CVS may reflect confined placental mosaicism rather than the true fetal genotype. [4]
  • Confirms with amniocentesis, which samples fetal cells in amniotic fluid and reflects the true fetal karyotype. [6]
  • Explains that confined placental mosaicism occurs in approximately 1–2% of CVS samples and that over-calling it can lead to irreversible decisions based on non-representative tissue. [6]

Weak

  • "Mosaicism on CVS means the baby has mosaic Down syndrome." [4]
  • "Reassure the patient — placental mosaicism is always benign." [6]

Branch E — The paediatrician's role

Examiner: "A pathogenic 22q11.2 deletion is confirmed on microarray. As the paediatrician, what is your antenatal role?" [1]

Strong

  • Translates the diagnosis into a postnatal plan: neonatal team readiness for cardiac evaluation, calcium monitoring, immune assessment and feeding evaluation. [1]
  • Opens the multidisciplinary pathway: clinical genetics, paediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery, neonatology, immunology, and parent support. [6]
  • Decides place and time of delivery at a centre with neonatal cardiac capability and ensures the neonatal team is alerted. [6]
  • Holds the medical-home role: developmental surveillance, ongoing follow-up, and the family's continuity of care through birth and beyond. [6]

Weak

  • "That is obstetrics; I will see the baby after birth." [6]
  • Offers a single outcome narrative that ignores family values, available therapy and the variable expressivity of the syndrome. [1]

References

  1. [1]Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. The New England journal of medicine, 2012.PMID 23215555
  2. [3]Norton ME, Jacobsson B, Swamy GK, et al. Cell-free DNA analysis for noninvasive examination of trisomy. The New England journal of medicine, 2015.PMID 25830321
  3. [4]Salomon LJ, Sotiriadis A, Wulff CB, et al. Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2019.PMID 31124209
  4. [6]Stosic M, Levy B, Wapner R. The use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America, 2018.PMID 29428286
  5. [7]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin Summary, Number 226. Obstetrics and gynecology, 2020.PMID 32976375
  6. [8]Spinella F, Bronet F, Carvalho F, et al. ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XXI: PGT analyses in 2018. Human reproduction open, 2023.PMID 37091225
  7. [11]Lord J, McMullan DJ, Eberhardt RY, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing in congenital heart disease (CODE) study. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2021.PMID 32388881