Skip to main content
MedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳MBBS / Core medicine✳Dermatology✳ICU Fellowship (CICM)✳Anaesthesia✳Emergency Medicine✳Psychiatry Fellowship✳Paediatrics Fellowship✳Physician Medicine✳MCQs✳SAQs✳Vivas✳OSCE✳Evidence-first✳

MedVellum.

The folio

Exam-exhaustive medical education across every specialty — evidence-graded topics, engraved plates, and practice in every written and oral format. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt · psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship
  • Paediatrics Fellowship
  • Physician Medicine

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Folio edition · Set in Instrument Serif & Archivo

Paeds Vivasallergy-and-immunology

Paeds Vivas · allergy-and-immunology

Vaccination of immunocompromised children — branching viva

Branching viva on vaccinating the immunocompromised child: the threat gate that excludes a combined T-cell defect before any live vaccine, sorting each vaccine into live-attenuated versus inactivated, the corticosteroid threshold and its washout, timing after transplant and chemotherapy, household cocooning, and verifying serology after haematopoietic stem cell transplant.

branching clinical structured oral
On this page & tools

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics

Target exams

RACP DCEMRCPCH ClinicalRCPSC Pediatrics
Prompt
Primary care clinic: a four-month-old boy born overseas is due his routine immunisations. There is no newborn SCID screen on file; his maternal uncle died in infancy; he has persistent oral thrush and faltering growth. The examiner asks: what is your framework, what is the single most important safety decision today, which vaccines are at risk, how will you confirm or exclude the relevant defect, and what will you do about the inactivated vaccines and the household — then branches to a seven-year-old two years post-haematopoietic stem cell transplant, well and off immunosuppression, and asks you to justify rebuilding her entire schedule on evidence of reconstitution rather than her old record.

Opening framework

My framework has four questions, applied in order. First, what is the immune defect — could this be a combined T-cell defect, which is the one state that turns a safe live vaccine into fatal disease? Second, is the vaccine in question live-attenuated or inactivated, because that single sorting decides the safety question. Third, what is the timing relative to the immunosuppression — corticosteroid dose and duration, chemotherapy cycle, time since transplant. Fourth, how will I verify that the vaccine worked, because in this population a complete record does not equal immunity. [1]

The threat gate

Before any vaccine today I run the threat gate. This infant could have severe combined immunodeficiency: there is no newborn SCID screen on file, a family history of early male infant death, persistent oral thrush, and faltering growth. A live-attenuated vaccine is irreversible once injected, and in a combined defect it can cause disseminated BCG, vaccine-strain rotavirus enteritis, or vaccine-strain varicella. So the single most important safety decision is to withhold all live vaccines until a combined T-cell defect is excluded. The vaccines at risk are BCG, rotavirus, MMR, and varicella. [1] [5] [7]

Confirming or excluding the defect

I confirm or exclude the defect with the TREC newborn screen and, where abnormal or unavailable, flow cytometry for lymphocyte subsets — T, B, and NK cells — with functional T-cell testing. I also send a baseline immunoglobulin level and full blood count. The pattern of lymphocyte subsets localises the block and predicts both the inheritance and the live-vaccine risk. Until those results are available, the live vaccines remain held. [5]

Inactivated vaccines and the household

Inactivated vaccines — DTPa, IPV, Hib, hepatitis B, pneumococcal, inactivated influenza, meningococcal — cannot replicate and are safe to give on schedule, because the harm in this population is not from inactivated vaccines but from leaving the child unprotected while a combined defect is being characterised. I would also address the household: fully vaccinate siblings and carers (cocooning) with inactivated influenza, COVID-19, MMR, and varicella, and explicitly ensure household contacts do not receive oral polio or live rotavirus, which shed live virus toward the infant. [2] [1]

Branch: the corticosteroid threshold

If the examiner branches to a child on systemic corticosteroids, I apply the ACIP threshold verbatim: live vaccines are contraindicated at prednisolone 2 mg/kg/day or more, or 20 mg/day or more for a child over 10 kg, for 14 days or longer, and are withheld for at least four weeks after stopping. Short courses, alternate-day dosing, and inhaled or topical steroids do not meet the threshold and do not restrict live vaccines. The principle is that iatrogenic risk tracks the dose and duration of current therapy, not a permanent label. [2]

Branch: post-haematopoietic stem cell transplant

For the seven-year-old two years post-transplant, I would not rely on her pre-transplant record. Conditioning erases prior immunity, so the schedule must be rebuilt on evidence of reconstitution. I re-vaccinate with inactivated vaccines first — DTPa, IPV, Hib, hepatitis B, pneumococcal, inactivated influenza, meningococcal — from around three to six months post-transplant once reconstitution is documented, and I re-introduce live vaccines, MMR and varicella, only after T-cell recovery is confirmed, typically around two years in the stable, graft-versus-host-disease-free child. I then check post-vaccine serology for tetanus, pneumococcal, Hib, and hepatitis B, and re-vaccinate non-responders rather than assuming the record is correct. [1] [8]

Closing: coordination and the trap to avoid

The closing point is coordination and the classic trap. The trap is to treat immunocompromised as a single state and to delay everything under the illusion of safety — which leaves the child exposed to influenza, pneumococcus, and pertussis. The correct reflex is to give inactivated vaccines promptly and optimally, and to withhold only the live vaccines until the defect and the timing permit. The plan is shared: the specialist service owns the defect-specific rules, the general practitioner owns the routine and catch-up schedule, and a written, reconciled record travels with the child at every transition. [1] [8]

References

  1. [1]Rubin LG, Levin MJ, Ljungman P, et al. 2013 IDSA clinical practice guideline for vaccination of the immunocompromised host. Clin Infect Dis, 2014.PMID 24421306
  2. [2]National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. General recommendations on immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep, 2011.PMID 21293327
  3. [5]Gennery AR. Severe combined immunodeficiency: newborn screening and the BCG vaccination. Arch Dis Child, 2022.PMID 35973752
  4. [7]Bakare N, Menschik D, Tiernan R, et al. Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and rotavirus vaccination: reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Vaccine, 2010.PMID 20674876
  5. [8]Hudspeth MP, et al. Post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant immunization practices in the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2010.PMID 20135703