Paeds Vivas · pain-palliative-and-end-of-life-care
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment — branching viva
Branching viva on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: definition and ethical standard, classification, stepwise plan, contested escalation, and family or sibling support.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Opening question
A six-month-old infant with severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy remains ventilator-dependent after a catastrophic out-of-hospital arrest. The intensive-care team judges that continued invasive support is not in the child's best interests; the parents ask that "everything be done". Give the one-sentence definition and the governing ethical standard. [1]
Branch 1 — classification and red flags
Classify the situation using the major axes for this topic and name the red flags that force escalation. [1][2]
Branch 2 — stepwise shared decision-making
Walk through the bedside pathway from recognition to a documented plan, including how you make a recommendation rather than an open menu. [1]
Branch 3 — contested disagreement
The family disagrees with the team. Outline second opinion, clinical ethics and court pathways while continuing comfort care. [1][2]
Branch 4 — family and sibling support
Explain how you support parents and siblings through the decision and into bereavement care. [3]
References
- [1]Larcher V et al. Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice. Arch Dis Child, 2015.PMID 25802250
- [2]Himelstein BP et al. Pediatric palliative care. N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 15103002
- [3]Dworetz AR et al. Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in extremely low gestational age neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2021.PMID 33082153
- [4]Gillam L et al. How Could Parents' Reasons Shift a Refusal of Treatment into the Zone of Parental Discretion?. Am J Bioeth, 2025.PMID 41108243