Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych CASC / OSCEProfessional — psychological therapies

Psych CASC / OSCE · Professional — psychological therapies

Explain CBT and co-design a first experiment — CASC communication station

MRCPsych/FRANZCP-style CASC: explain CBT collaborative empiricism, five-area map for social anxiety, drop safety behaviours concept, design a small behavioural experiment, address medication questions briefly, and check understanding.

communication
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A patient with social anxiety wants to understand what CBT actually involves and leaves with a shared formulation fragment and a first behavioural experiment plan, without jargon overload or false promises.

Station brief

Format. Communication station, approximately 7–10 minutes active time after reading. You are the psychiatry registrar in outpatient clinic. [1]

Candidate instructions. The patient has social anxiety and has been offered CBT. Explain what CBT is in plain language, map a simple five-area formulation of a recent social situation, introduce the idea of safety behaviours, and co-design one small behavioural experiment with a clear prediction and review plan. Address a brief question about whether tablets will still be needed. Check understanding; avoid promising cure; keep collaborative tone. [1][3][5]

Candidate scenario

Your patient is 24, avoids team meetings, over-prepares scripts, wears dark clothes “to disappear,” and replays conversations for hours. Last week in a meeting their heart raced; they thought “everyone can see I’m incompetent,” spoke once, then left early. They want CBT explained “without psychobabble.” They take escitalopram 10 mg and ask if they must stop it to do CBT. No active suicidal plan; low mood secondary to avoidance. [2]

Marking domains

  • Warmth, collaboration, jargon control
  • Accurate plain-language definition of CBT (structured, here-and-now, skills, homework)
  • Five-area map of the meeting example (situation, thoughts, emotion, body, behaviour)
  • Names safety behaviours (script over-prep, dark clothes, early exit, post-event rumination)
  • Co-designs a specific behavioural experiment with prediction and review
  • Mentions homework/between-session practice
  • Medication: combined care acceptable; do not advise abrupt unsupervised stop
  • Checks understanding; realistic hope without overpromise [1][3][4][5]
Reveal assessor key

Open. Role; ask what they already understand by CBT; permission to sketch a simple map together. [3]

Explain CBT. Time-limited structured therapy where we work as a team to test what keeps anxiety going — thoughts, body feelings, and things we do to stay safe — then practise new approaches between sessions. Not just chatting; not the therapist “fixing your mind.” [1][5]

Five-area (meeting). Situation: speaking in meeting. Thought: “I’m incompetent; everyone sees it.” Emotion: anxiety/shame. Body: racing heart. Behaviours: brief comment, leave early, later rumination; prep scripts and dark clothes as safety strategies. Loop: leaving early stops learning that anxiety peaks and falls and that people may not evaluate as feared. [1]

Experiment example. Belief: “If I speak for 30 seconds without a script and stay until the end, people will laugh or I’ll be humiliated.” Prediction rated 0–100%. Task: one prepared sentence only (not full script), stay to end, no phone-checking for reactions; note what actually happened; re-rate belief. Agree when/where; trouble-shoot. [3][4]

Medication. Escitalopram can continue; CBT and medication often work together. Any change is a planned medical decision, not a requirement to “qualify” for CBT. [5]

Close. Summarise shared plan; written homework; risk/support net; invite questions. [4]

References

  1. [1]Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses Clin Psychol Rev, 2006.PMID 16199119
  2. [2]Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, et al. The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses Cognit Ther Res, 2012.PMID 23459093
  3. [3]Kuyken W, Beshai S, Dudley R, et al. Assessing Competence in Collaborative Case Conceptualization: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Collaborative Case Conceptualization Rating Scale Behav Cogn Psychother, 2016.PMID 25629820
  4. [4]Kazantzis N, Whittington C, Zelencich L, et al. Quantity and Quality of Homework Compliance: A Meta-Analysis of Relations With Outcome in Cognitive Behavior Therapy Behav Ther, 2016.PMID 27816086
  5. [5]David D, Cristea I, Hofmann SG Why Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Is the Current Gold Standard of Psychotherapy Front Psychiatry, 2018.PMID 29434552