Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych CASC / OSCEProfessional — formulation

Psych CASC / OSCE · Professional — formulation

Co-construct a formulation with the patient — CASC communication station

MRCPsych/FRANZCP-style CASC: elicit the person's explanatory model, build a shared 4P formulation, include strengths, check cultural meaning, and map a bio-psycho-social plan and safety net.

communication
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A young adult with depression and panic wants to understand 'why this is happening'; you must co-construct a simple biopsychosocial/4P formulation in plain language and link it to a collaborative plan without jargon overload or blame.

Station brief

Format. Communication station, approximately 7–10 minutes active time after reading. You are the psychiatry registrar in outpatient clinic. [1]

Candidate instructions. The person asks why they feel this way. Collaboratively develop a simple formulation using predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating, and protective factors across biological, psychological, and social domains. Use plain language. Include strengths. Explore cultural or personal meaning of the illness. Agree a shared plan (biological, psychological, social, safety). Avoid blame and jargon piles. Check understanding and invite corrections. [1][2][3]

Candidate scenario

Your patient is 26, with 3 months of low mood, panic attacks on public transport, and incomplete university attendance after a humiliating presentation. They drink four standard drinks most nights “to switch off”. They describe an anxious childhood and a father who called them weak. They identify as belonging to a minority cultural community and worry the family will see mental health care as shameful. They still have a close cousin and want to finish their degree. No active suicide plan; passive thoughts when panic peaks. [1][4]

Marking domains

  • Empathy, collaborative stance, jargon control
  • Elicits patient’s explanatory model (“what do you think is going on?”)
  • Structures 4Ps clearly in accessible language
  • Touches biological (sleep/alcohol), psychological (self-criticism/avoidance), social/family/cultural meaning
  • Names at least one protective factor (cousin, degree goal)
  • Links each major plan item to the formulation
  • Safety: explores suicidal thoughts; agrees safety net without over- or under-reacting
  • Invites correction; summarises shared understanding [1][3][4][5]
Reveal assessor key

Open. Introduce role; normalise the “why is this happening?” question; explain you will build a shared picture together, not a secret theory. [2][3]

Elicit. Patient’s story of onset (presentation humiliation), current loops (avoidance of uni/transport, alcohol for shutdown), early experiences (father’s criticism), cultural shame concerns, what still matters (degree, cousin). [4]

Co-construct 4Ps (plain language).

[1][2]
  • Predisposing: longstanding anxiety sensitivity; harsh early messages about weakness.
  • Precipitating: humiliating presentation / academic stress.
  • Perpetuating: avoiding classes and transport → skill loss and more panic; alcohol → worse sleep/mood; shame and secrecy reducing support.
  • Protective: cousin; motivation to finish degree; attending today.
[1][2]

Check: “Does that fit? What would you change?” [1][3]

Plan map.

[1][2]
  • Bio: alcohol reduction plan; sleep; discuss whether medication is appropriate if moderate–severe depression (no forced brand/dose if not indicated in station—state principles and follow-up).
  • Psycho: CBT-style work on panic and self-criticism; graded return to transport/classes.
  • Social/cultural: problem-solve family disclosure with consent; involve cousin if wanted; address shame without forcing outing to whole family.
  • Safety: passive thoughts plan — warning signs, contacts, crisis numbers, review timing. [1][2]

Close. Teach-back summary; written plan if possible; thanks; next appointment. [3]

Common fails

Lecturing a textbook BPS list without collaboration; blaming the father as the entire story; ignoring culture/shame; no protective factors; no link from formulation to plan; skipping risk; drowning the patient in jargon (schemas, EE, diathesis-stress) without translation. [1][4]

References

  1. [1]Macneil CA, Hasty MK, Conus P, et al. Is diagnosis enough to guide interventions in mental health? Using case formulation in clinical practice BMC Med, 2012.PMID 23016556
  2. [2]Owen G What is formulation in psychiatry? Psychol Med, 2023.PMID 36878884
  3. [3]Kuyken W, Beshai S, Dudley R, et al. Assessing Competence in Collaborative Case Conceptualization: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Collaborative Case Conceptualization Rating Scale Behav Cogn Psychother, 2016.PMID 25629820
  4. [4]Aggarwal NK, Chen D, Lewis-Fernández R If You Don't Ask, They Don't Tell: The Cultural Formulation Interview and Patient Perceptions of the Clinical Relationship Am J Psychother, 2022.PMID 35430870
  5. [5]Lewis-Fernández R, Aggarwal NK, Lam PC, et al. Feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the Cultural Formulation Interview: mixed-methods results from the DSM-5 international field trial Br J Psychiatry, 2017.PMID 28104738