Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych CASC / OSCEPsychopharmacology — ketamine and esketamine

Psych CASC / OSCE · Psychopharmacology — ketamine and esketamine

Explaining esketamine for TRD and safety rules (CASC)

CASC-style communication station: shared decision on esketamine after failed antidepressants, supervised dosing, observation, realistic benefits and risks, and ECT comparison.

communication
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 45-year-old with treatment-resistant depression and her partner ask about 'ketamine nasal spray'. They fear addiction and bladder damage, wonder if she can take it home, and ask whether it means she will never need ECT.

Station instructions (candidate)

You have 7 minutes. Explain why esketamine is being considered after multiple adequate antidepressant failures, how supervised clinic dosing works (not take-home), what happens in the observation period, common short-term effects (dissociation, nausea, blood-pressure rise), and how this differs from recreational ketamine harm. Compare with ECT using ELEKT-D-level honesty for nonpsychotic TRD without declaring ECT obsolete. Do not guarantee cure. Do not minimise addiction/diversion concerns — explain clinic controls.[1][2][3][4][5]

Marking domains

Empathy and agenda setting; accurate plain-language TRD rationale; clear supervised-dosing rules; BP/observation explanation; balanced AE and misuse discussion; realistic timeline (induction then possible maintenance); ECT comparison without false dichotomy; collaborative plan and written information/crisis contacts.[1][2][3][4][5]

Model communication map

  1. Open: thank them; check understanding of why previous antidepressants failed; name shared goals (mood lift, function, safety).[5]
  2. Why now: several proper medicine trials have not controlled depression; guidelines and trials support considering rapid-acting options such as esketamine in treatment-resistant depression, given with another oral antidepressant under supervision.[1][5]
  3. How it is given: in clinic only; typical adult doses are fixed device strengths (for example 56 or 84 mg); she stays for observation (about two hours) with blood-pressure checks; she should not drive until the next day after a treatment day.[1][5]
  4. What she may feel: floating/dream-like feelings, dizziness or nausea can happen and usually settle; we monitor and support through the session.[3]
  5. Misuse fears: recreational high-dose ketamine is different from supervised medical dosing; we do not send the regulated spray home; bladder problems are mainly linked to chronic heavy non-medical use — still we take symptoms seriously.[3][5]
  6. Staying well: if she responds, continuing treatment for a period can reduce relapse risk compared with stopping early — maintenance is part of the plan, not one miracle dose.[2]
  7. ECT: for nonpsychotic treatment-resistant depression, research comparing IV ketamine with ECT found ketamine was not worse on the main outcome in that trial; ECT remains very important, especially for psychotic depression or when ketamine is unsuitable — we decide together.[4]
  8. Close: questions, written info, crisis contacts, first booking, partner role in escort if needed.[5]

Common fails

  • Offering take-home nasal spray "to save clinic time."[1][5]
  • Guaranteeing permanent cure or zero addiction risk.[3][5]
  • Terrifying them with bladder injury without distinguishing recreational misuse from supervised care.[3]
  • Saying ECT is never needed after ELEKT-D.[4]
  • Ignoring ongoing suicide safety planning if ideation has been present.[5]

References

  1. [1]Popova V, Daly EJ, Trivedi M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 31109201
  2. [2]Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 31166571
  3. [3]Short B, Fong J, Galvez V, et al. Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry, 2018.PMID 28757132
  4. [4]Anand A, Mathew SJ, Sanacora G, et al. Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. N Engl J Med, 2023.PMID 37224232
  5. [5]McIntyre RS, Rosenblat JD, Nemeroff CB, et al. Synthesizing the Evidence for Ketamine and Esketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: An International Expert Opinion on the Available Evidence and Implementation. Am J Psychiatry, 2021.PMID 33726522