Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych CASC / OSCEAddiction psychiatry — psychosocial interventions

Psych CASC / OSCE · Addiction psychiatry — psychosocial interventions

Negotiate contingency management and mutual-help after stimulant relapse — CASC communication station

MRCPsych/FRANZCP-style communication station: explain CM mechanism and protocol, destigmatise testing, offer secular mutual-help, set boundaries against coercive AA, shared plan and teach-back.

communication
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 32-year-old man who uses methamphetamine weekly is offered a 12-week contingency management programme with thrice-weekly urine tests and escalating gift-card rewards. He thinks it is 'bribery' and humiliating. His mother wants him forced into AA daily. He will consider SMART Recovery if it is 'not religious.'

Station brief

Format. Communication station, approximately 7–10 minutes active time after reading. Examiner may play patient and/or mother. [1]

Candidate instructions. Explain contingency management in plain language. Address the bribery concern without defensiveness. Describe thrice-weekly testing as clinical verification, not moral judgment. Offer SMART Recovery as secular mutual-help; do not force AA. Negotiate a collaborative 12-week plan. Check understanding. [2][3]

Candidate scenario

He smokes methamphetamine most days, lost employment, is not opioid-dependent, and has no acute psychosis today. Clinic can run thrice-weekly urine CM with escalating gift cards for negative tests and reset after positive tests. SMART Recovery online and in-person options exist. Mother is frightened and wants compulsory AA. [1][3]

Marking domains

  • Empathy with shame about testing and mother’s fear
  • Accurate plain-language CM explanation (verify → immediate reward → escalate/reset)
  • Bribery reframe with evidence posture (not numbers dump)
  • Secular mutual-help offer; no coercive AA
  • Shared plan and teach-back
  • Safety-net if craving/suicide risk rises [1][2][3][4]
Reveal assessor key

Open. Name role and time; ask patient and mother top concerns (humiliation vs death/job loss). Validate both.[4]

CM explanation. “We are not bribing you to be a good person. Meth gives a quick reward; we temporarily make not using also give a quick, fair reward when a test confirms it — several times a week — then build skills and peer support so life rewards take over.” Mention escalating rewards and that a positive test means missing that day’s reward, not automatic exile.[1][2]

Evidence posture. “Programmes like this have been studied for methamphetamine and other drugs and help people stay abstinent during treatment.” Avoid overclaiming permanent cure; plan aftercare.[1][5]

Mutual-help. Offer SMART Recovery as requested secular option; explain AA is voluntary and not required; mother can seek Al-Anon-type family support without forcing him into meetings.[3][4]

Close. Written plan: CM schedule, first SMART meeting, crisis numbers, review date; teach-back of what happens after a positive test.[1][3]

References

  1. [1]Roll JM, et al. Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorders Am J Psychiatry, 2006.PMID 17074952
  2. [2]Prendergast M, et al. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis Addiction, 2006.PMID 17034434
  3. [3]Zemore SE, et al. A longitudinal study of the comparative efficacy of Women for Sobriety, LifeRing, SMART Recovery, and 12-step groups for those with AUD J Subst Abuse Treat, 2018.PMID 29606223
  4. [4]Humphreys K, et al. Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems J Subst Abuse Treat, 2004.PMID 15063905
  5. [5]Dutra L, et al. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders Am J Psychiatry, 2008.PMID 18198270