Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych CASC / OSCEGeneral adult psychiatry — reactive attachment and disinhibited social engagement

Psych CASC / OSCE · General adult psychiatry — reactive attachment and disinhibited social engagement

Explain residual DSED risk and refuse coercive attachment therapy — CASC communication station

MRCPsych/FRANZCP-style communication station: explain RAD vs DSED, residual course, caregiving and boundary coaching, refuse coercive therapies, and plan depression/comorbidity care without attachment-targeted drugs.

communication
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
You meet the adoptive parents of a 16-year-old with a past diagnosis of disinhibited social engagement disorder after early institutional care. Residual overfamiliarity with strangers continues. They have been offered 'holding therapy' by a private clinic and want to know if he will have 'RAD for life' as an adult, whether medication will fix attachment, and what they should do about stranger risk and low mood.

Station brief

Format. Communication station, approximately 7–10 minutes active time after reading. You are the psychiatry registrar in a transition/outpatient clinic. [1]

Candidate instructions. Explain the difference between RAD and DSED, why residual disinhibited features can persist after good care without meaning the parents failed, why holding/rebirthing therapies are not recommended, how to manage stranger risk and low mood, and what adult residual risk means without promising a lifelong "RAD" label. Check understanding. The examiner plays the adoptive parents. [1][2][3]

Candidate scenario

Your patient is 16 with documented early institutional care and a childhood DSED diagnosis. Residual overfamiliarity with strangers continues; mood has been low for 6 weeks. Parents feel blamed and are considering a private coercive attachment programme. You plan boundary coaching, multiagency supervision advice, mood assessment and treatment, and explicit refusal of holding therapy. [1][2][4]

Marking domains

  • Empathy, structure, agenda-setting; reduce carer self-blame
  • Clear RAD vs DSED explanation (withdrawn vs indiscriminate)
  • Insufficient-care aetiology and why residual DSED can persist
  • Explicit, firm refusal of coercive holding/rebirthing with rationale
  • Practical stranger-risk supervision plan
  • Mood/comorbidity plan; no medication "for attachment"
  • Adult residual framing without inventing freestanding adult RAD
  • Teach-back / shared decision-making [1][2][3]
Reveal assessor key

Open. Name time; ask main worries (blame, lifelong label, holding therapy, safety, mood). Validate stress of parenting after early adversity. [1]

Explain DSED vs RAD. "Reactive attachment disorder is a withdrawn pattern — the child does not seek or accept comfort. Your son's picture fits disinhibited social engagement disorder: too little caution with strangers after very limited early care. They share a cause — extreme insufficient care — but look different and can have different courses." [1][4]

Residual course. "With stable sensitive care, withdrawn features often improve. Indiscriminate friendliness can last longer even when parenting is good — that does not mean you caused it now." [1][4]

Refuse coercion. "We do not recommend holding, rebirthing, or forced-regression therapies. Expert child-maltreatment guidance found them unproven and potentially dangerous. We use relationship-based, non-coercive support." [2]

Safety and mood. Practical supervision for outings and transport; teach stranger-boundary skills; assess depression and treat with psychological care first-line where appropriate; if an antidepressant is needed later it is for depression with standard monitoring — not to 'cure attachment'. [1]

Adult residual. "Some young people after early severe deprivation have ongoing emotional or developmental challenges into adulthood. We treat what is present now and plan transition support — we do not stamp a lifelong 'adult RAD' label as a destiny." [3]

Close. Summarise, teach-back, written safety plan, follow-up, multiagency contacts. [1]

References

  1. [1]Zeanah CH, Chesher T, Boris NW; AACAP Committee on Quality Issues Practice Parameter for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Reactive Attachment Disorder and Disinhibited Social Engagement Disorder J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 27806867
  2. [2]Chaffin M, Hanson R, Saunders BE, Nichols T, et al. Report of the APSAC task force on attachment therapy, reactive attachment disorder, and attachment problems Child Maltreat, 2006.PMID 16382093
  3. [3]Sonuga-Barke EJS, Kennedy M, Kumsta R, Knights N, et al. Child-to-adult neurodevelopmental and mental health trajectories after early life deprivation: the young adult follow-up of the longitudinal English and Romanian Adoptees study Lancet, 2017.PMID 28237264
  4. [4]O'Connor TG, Rutter M; English and Romanian Adoptees Study Team Attachment disorder behavior following early severe deprivation: extension and longitudinal follow-up J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 2000.PMID 10846304