Psych CASC / OSCE · Forensic psychiatry — victimology
Explain trauma-informed care after sexual assault to a distressed victim — CASC communication station
MRCPsych/FRANZCP-style CASC: trauma-informed communication with a sexual-assault survivor; prevent secondary victimisation; outline stepped care and multi-agency plan.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Station brief
Format. Communication station, approximately 7–10 minutes active time after reading. You are the psychiatry registrar seeing a sexual-assault survivor in ED. The examiner plays the patient.[1][2]
Candidate instructions. Establish rapport and safety. Acknowledge secondary victimisation. Explain what you need to assess without forcing a full narrative. Outline medical/forensic options and mental-health next steps (trauma-focused therapy when ready; medication options if needed). Coordinate with police without becoming an interrogator. Check understanding. Do not invent statute section numbers for victims schemes.[1][3][6]
Candidate scenario
Patient says: “I already told the nurse. Police want every detail again. The medical exam feels like another assault. I can’t sleep and I keep seeing his face. If I take tablets will I be addicted? Do I have to do exposure therapy tonight? Write whatever you need for court so this ends.” She is medically stable, no active suicidal plan, lives alone, and the alleged perpetrator has messaged her twice tonight.[1][2]
Marking domains
- Empathy and non-blaming language; names secondary victimisation in plain terms
- Safety: perpetrator contact, practical protection steps, crisis plan
- Assessment pacing: consent, limits of confidentiality, no forced full narrative
- Clear stepped care: safety/support now; trauma-focused therapy as first-line when ready; optional SSRI discussion without coercion
- Boundary on court letters: cannot rubber-stamp disability or invent law
- Checks understanding; collaborative plan with SARC/advocacy/police liaison [1][3][4][6]
Reveal assessor key
Open. Thank her for speaking with you. Validate that repeated retelling and unsupported exams can feel like a second assault — that is real and is called secondary victimisation. Your job is medical and psychological care, not interrogation.[1][2]
Safety. Acknowledge the messages as ongoing contact risk. Agree practical steps (block/report via police advice, safe stay tonight, emergency contacts). Brief suicide/self-harm check without catastrophising.[6]
Assessment. Explain you need enough information for safety and diagnosis thresholds, not every sensory detail now. Offer breaks; coordinate so other teams share necessary facts rather than each starting from zero.[1]
Treatment frame. Early support and psychological first-aid principles tonight; trauma-focused therapy (e.g. PE/CPT/TF-CBT/EMDR pathways) is first-line when she is ready and safe — not forced tonight. Medication (e.g. sertraline if later indicated) is optional, oral daily dosing with side-effect discussion, not automatic addiction. PCL-5 may be used later to track symptoms.[3][4][5][7]
Boundaries. You will document carefully for clinical care. You will not invent Act sections or certify total permanent disability from this single ED contact. Court processes have separate pathways and supports.[3][6]
Close. Summarise tonight’s plan (medical/SARC option, safe location, follow-up, crisis numbers); invite questions; confirm she feels less alone in the process.[2][6]
References
- [1]Campbell R, Raja S Secondary victimization of rape victims: insights from mental health professionals who treat survivors of violence Violence Vict, 1999.PMID 10606433
- [2]Campbell R The psychological impact of rape victims Am Psychol, 2008.PMID 19014228
- [3]Guideline Development Panel for the Treatment of PTSD in Adults, American Psychological Association Summary of the clinical practice guideline for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults Am Psychol, 2019.PMID 31305099
- [4]Foa EB, Hembree EA, Cahill SP, Rauch SA, et al. Randomized trial of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder with and without cognitive restructuring J Consult Clin Psychol, 2005.PMID 16287395
- [5]Brady K, Pearlstein T, Asnis GM, Baker D, et al. Efficacy and safety of sertraline treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2000.PMID 10770145
- [6]Rodwell D, Edworthy R Using a trauma-informed care framework to explore social climate and borderline personality disorder in forensic inpatient settings Int J Ment Health Nurs, 2024.PMID 38291657
- [7]Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation J Trauma Stress, 2015.PMID 26606250