Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsConsultation-liaison psychiatry — abnormal illness behaviour

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Consultation-liaison psychiatry — abnormal illness behaviour

Abnormal illness behaviour and the sick role — C-L MEQ

FRANZCP-style MEQ on Pilowsky AIB, Parsons sick role, mapping to SSD/IAD, CHAMP/Barsky CBT, Henningsen principles, and non-dualistic C-L care.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 46-year-old office worker is referred to C-L after the fifth medical admission in 18 months for chest pain, palpitations and ‘impending doom.’ Serial ECGs, troponins, CTPA and stress testing are normal. They demand implantable loop monitoring ‘to catch the heart attack early,’ check their pulse hourly, search cardiac forums nightly, and have stopped working. PHQ-9 is 14; no psychosis. GP notes 28 encounters this year. Partner has taken over household tasks and says ‘they are too sick to try rehab.’ (i) Define the sick role, illness behaviour and abnormal illness behaviour, and locate this presentation on Pilowsky’s axes. (ii) Outline differential diagnosis including DSM-5-TR mappings and discriminators from factitious disorder and malingering. (iii) Structure a C-L assessment including measures, risk and investigation policy. (iv) Give a management plan spanning communication, psychological care, comorbidity treatment and service design. (v) State prognosis factors and pitfalls. (20 marks)

Marking framework

Model answer outline (examiner map)

(i) Definitions and axes (≈4 marks)

Sick role (Parsons teaching): rights — temporary role exemption; not held morally responsible for becoming ill. Obligations — desire to get well; seek competent help and cooperate.[3]

Illness behaviour (Mechanic): monitoring, interpreting and acting on symptoms and using care systems.[3]

AIB (Pilowsky): maladaptive perception/evaluation/action regarding health, disproportionate after adequate assessment, persists despite explanation.[1]

This stem is illness-affirming, somatically focused (cardiac disease conviction, checking, high utilisation, work exit, family accommodation) — not illness-denying.[2]

(ii) Differential and mapping (≈4 marks)

Working psychiatric formulations: illness anxiety disorder if residual somatic symptoms are mild and health anxiety dominates; SSD if distressing somatic symptoms plus disproportionate B-criteria; panic disorder comorbidity possible; depression (PHQ-9 14).[8] AIB is formulation language, not a substitute code.[1][8]

Factitious/malingering: require intentional production and (for malingering) external incentives — not supported by default here; avoid accusation without evidence.[7] Keep organic door ajar for change/red flags despite extensive normal work-up.[4]

(iii) Assessment (≈4 marks)

Alliance-first history of feared diseases, checking/reassurance/internet behaviours, prior explanations, function, family reinforcement, utilisation. MSE, suicide risk, substance use. Scales: health-anxiety/Whiteley lineage items, PHQ-15 if multi-symptom, PHQ-9/GAD-7. Collateral GP. Agree shared investigation thresholds and single medical home rather than endless loop monitoring without new indications.[4][5]

(iv) Management (≈5 marks)

Both–and explanation (sensations real; threat system and behaviour maintain disability). Henningsen principles: scheduled reviews, limit unfocused specialist shopping, functional goals (return-to-work graded plan with partner education against permanent invalidism).[4] CBT for health anxiety (Barsky; CHAMP medical-clinic CBT-HA).[5][6] Treat depression with standard antidepressant pathway if indicated; no drug cures AIB as a construct.[5] Non-collusion if later intentional features emerge.[7]

(v) Prognosis and pitfalls (≈3 marks)

Better with engagement, treated mood, reduced iatrogenesis, family renegotiation of sick role. Pitfalls: pejorative dismissal; endless tests; missing suicide/depression; premature factitious label; closing organic door forever.[1][4][7]

Examiner notes

Top scripts name Pilowsky, Parsons/Mechanic, Dimsdale SSD logic, Barsky/CHAMP, Henningsen, and explicitly refuse dualism. Fail scripts that discharge with “nothing wrong,” collude with non-indicated devices without review, or equate all high utilisers with malingering.[4][6][7]

References

  1. [1]Pilowsky I Abnormal illness behaviour Br J Med Psychol, 1969.PMID 5378602
  2. [2]Pilowsky I A general classification of abnormal illness behaviours Br J Med Psychol, 1978.PMID 646959
  3. [3]Mechanic D Sociological dimensions of illness behavior Soc Sci Med, 1995.PMID 8545675
  4. [4]Henningsen P, Zipfel S, Herzog W Management of functional somatic syndromes Lancet, 2007.PMID 17368156
  5. [5]Barsky AJ, Ahern DK Cognitive behavior therapy for hypochondriasis: a randomized controlled trial JAMA, 2004.PMID 15039413
  6. [6]Tyrer P, Cooper S, Salkovskis P, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for health anxiety in medical patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial Lancet, 2014.PMID 24139977
  7. [7]Bass C, Halligan P Factitious disorders and malingering: challenges for clinical assessment and management Lancet, 2014.PMID 24612861
  8. [8]Dimsdale JE, Creed F, Escobar J, et al. Somatic symptom disorder: an important change in DSM J Psychosom Res, 2013.PMID 23972410