Psych MEQs / SAQs · Psychotherapy
MEQ: ACT formulation and plan for anxiety with control agenda
FRANZCP-style MEQ on ACT definition, hexaflex, avoidance/fusion formulation, treatment sequence, combined care, and safety priorities.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Definition, flexibility, hexaflex (5). ACT is a third-wave/contextual CBT aiming to increase psychological flexibility: contacting the present moment as a conscious person and changing or persisting in behaviour when doing so serves valued ends.[1] Six hexaflex processes: acceptance, cognitive defusion, present-moment contact, self-as-context, values, committed action.[1]
(ii) Formulation and CBT contrast (5). Control agenda: hours spent eliminating anxious thoughts and avoiding seminars when sensations appear → short-term relief, long-term cost (dropped valued research collaboration) = experiential avoidance.[2] Sticky literal belief that anxious thoughts must vanish before living = cognitive fusion.[1] Versus traditional CBT: ACT prioritises changing the function of private events (willingness/defusion) and values-based action rather than requiring thought content restructuring as the primary first move — though both can help anxiety and comparative trials often show rough parity of outcomes with active CBT.[1][4]
(iii) Treatment sequence and homework (5). Engage and map control agenda costs → willingness practices → defusion of "I must eliminate anxiety first" → present-moment/self-as-context as needed → clarify values (scholarship/collaboration) → committed action with graded exposure-with-willingness to seminar cues → review measures and homework each session.[1][3] First homework example: attend the first 20 minutes of one seminar this week while using a brief willingness cue ("I can have tightness and still sit here for my research values"), then note what happened without trying to win against anxiety. Grade down if needed so success is possible.[1]
(iv) Combined care and priorities (5). Escitalopram 10 mg for 5 weeks is early; plan dose optimisation per usual antidepressant practice plus ACT rather than either/or ideology; ACT is not anti-medication and meta-analytic evidence supports ACT for clinically relevant problems including anxiety/depression domains in broader syntheses.[3][5] ACT is not priority today if high acute suicide risk needing containment, mania, psychosis emergency, delirium, severe intoxication, or medical instability — stabilise first; passive death wish still needs ongoing risk review and safety planning alongside therapy.[1]
References
- [1]Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes Behav Res Ther, 2006.PMID 16300724
- [2]Hayes SC, Wilson KG, Gifford EV, Follette VM, Strosahl K Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment J Consult Clin Psychol, 1996.PMID 8991302
- [3]A-Tjak JG, Davis ML, Morina N, Powers MB, Smits JA, Emmelkamp PM A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems Psychother Psychosom, 2015.PMID 25547522
- [4]Arch JJ, Eifert GH, Davies C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) versus acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for mixed anxiety disorders J Consult Clin Psychol, 2012.PMID 22563639
- [5]Bai Z, Luo S, Zhang L, Wu S, Chi I Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to reduce depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis J Affect Disord, 2020.PMID 31563072