Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsEmergency psychiatry

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Emergency psychiatry

Acute agitation and rapid tranquillisation ladder (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on acute agitation: de-escalation, RT ladder with combination ban, TREC/ANZ agent logic, capacity/least-restrictive care, monitoring and documentation.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
A 34-year-old man with bipolar disorder is brought to ED after 48 hours of decreasing sleep and increasing irritability. He is pacing, shouting, refusing oral medication, and swinging at staff when approached. Capillary glucose 5.4 mmol per litre, SpO2 98 percent, HR 118, BP 156/94, temperature 37.2 C. ECG QTc is 430 ms. Collateral: he stopped lithium 3 weeks ago and may have used methamphetamine last night. A junior doctor wants to give IM olanzapine 10 mg immediately followed by IM lorazepam 2 mg in the same syringe. (i) Outline your immediate assessment and de-escalation priorities. (ii) Critique the proposed medication plan and provide a safer RT pathway with named doses, routes and monitoring. (iii) Explain how agent choice differs for primary mania versus stimulant SBD and for alcohol withdrawal. (iv) Address capacity and least-restrictive legal principles for treatment. (v) State post-event documentation and disposition considerations. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Immediate assessment and de-escalation. Scene safety: adequate staff, clear exits, remove weapons/audience, one calm lead communicator (Project BETA principles — respect space, concise language, offer choices). ABCDE already partly reassuring (oxygenating, afebrile, glucose normal) but continue continuous observation for hyperthermia and collapse if SBD evolves. Re-offer oral medication if momentarily safer. Focused history: mania symptoms, lithium cessation, stimulant use, head injury, seizure. Emergency MSE: threat content, command hallucinations, suicidality, attention. Collateral. Targeted medical clearance already includes ECG QTc — document rationale for any further labs (CK if restraint/exertion).[1][2]

(ii) Critique and safer RT pathway. Do not give IM olanzapine and IM lorazepam together or in the same syringe. Parenteral benzodiazepine with IM olanzapine risks profound respiratory depression and hypotension. Safer plan: continue de-escalation; if IM required, use a single agent. Reasonable options depending on setting: IM lorazepam 1–2 mg, IM olanzapine 5–10 mg alone (then wait ≥1 hour before any parenteral BZD), IM aripiprazole ~9.75 mg, or TREC-backed IM haloperidol 5 mg + promethazine 25–50 mg if cardiac risk allows (QTc currently acceptable). In ANZ ED undifferentiated SBD, IM droperidol 5–10 mg is evidence-supported first-line with monitoring. Post-dose: continuous observation; RR, SpO2, BP, HR, consciousness every 15 minutes for ≥1 hour; endpoint calm and rousable.[1][3][4]

(iii) Cause-matched agents. Primary mania/psychosis: antipsychotic ± promethazine combination pathway; reinstate definitive mood treatment later (not RT). Stimulant SBD: ANZ ED droperidol/midazolam evidence; medical monitoring for hyperthermia/arrhythmia. Alcohol/sedative withdrawal: benzodiazepines treat the pathophysiology — antipsychotic alone is inadequate. Always re-check combination ban when mixing classes.[1][3]

(iv) Capacity and law. Assess capacity for specific decisions (oral meds, remaining for care): understand, retain, use/weigh, communicate. Mania/stimulant intoxication may impair capacity but assessment must be explicit. If incapacitous with serious risk, use emergency treatment principles and local Mental Health Act for ongoing care, documenting least-restrictive alternatives tried. Do not invent section numbers for other jurisdictions.[5][1]

(v) Documentation and disposition. Document: risks, de-escalation attempts, capacity, legal basis, agent/dose/route/time, monitoring, response, complications, debrief. Disposition: medical observation if toxicity/SBD physiology; psychiatric admission (voluntary if possible; involuntary if criteria met) for manic relapse with violence risk; only discharge if risk reduced, supports present, follow-up timed — unlikely immediately after this presentation.[1]

Common errors

  • Co-administering IM olanzapine and parenteral lorazepam
  • No named doses or no monitoring plan
  • Ignoring stimulant/mania differential
  • Inventing Mental Health Act sections
  • Endpoint of unconsciousness rather than calm and rousable
[1]

Examiner notes

Full marks require the combination ban, a named single-agent (or H+P / droperidol) pathway with monitoring intervals, capacity/least-restrictive principles, and disposition thinking. Vague “sedate and section” fails. [1]

References

  1. [1]Patel MX, Sethi FN, Barnes TR, et al. Joint BAP NAPICU evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical management of acute disturbance: De-escalation and rapid tranquillisation J Psychopharmacol, 2018.PMID 29882463
  2. [2]Richmond JS, Berlin JS, Fishkind AB, et al. Verbal De-escalation of the Agitated Patient: Consensus Statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA De-escalation Workgroup West J Emerg Med, 2012.PMID 22461917
  3. [3]Isbister GK, Calver LA, Page CB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intramuscular droperidol versus midazolam for violence and acute behavioral disturbance: the DORM study Ann Emerg Med, 2010.PMID 20868907
  4. [4]Huf G, Coutinho ES, Adams CE, et al. Rapid tranquillisation in psychiatric emergency settings in Brazil: pragmatic randomised controlled trial of intramuscular haloperidol versus intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine BMJ, 2007.PMID 17954515
  5. [5]Spencer BWJ, Gergel T, Hotopf M, et al. Unwell in hospital but not incapable: cross-sectional study on the dissociation of decision-making capacity for treatment and research in in-patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. Br J Psychiatry, 2018.PMID 29909778