Psych MEQs / SAQs · Foundations — basic neuroscience for psychiatry
Basic neuroscience for psychiatry — MEQ
FRANZCP-style MEQ on multilevel neuroscience, LTP, dopamine pathways, methods critique, and syndrome translation.
On this page & tools
Target exams
Model answer
Reveal model answer
(i) Levels and RDoC. Useful levels: molecule/receptor → synapse/plasticity → pathway → large-scale network → behaviour/syndrome. Clinical care still uses DSM/ICD categorical diagnoses for communication and eligibility. RDoC organises dimensional research constructs (e.g. negative valence, cognitive systems) across units of analysis; it does not replace clinical manuals. [4]
(ii) LTP. High-frequency or associative co-activation can strengthen synapses. At many glutamatergic synapses, NMDA receptors require glutamate and postsynaptic depolarisation to relieve Mg2+ block; Ca2+ influx engages kinases and can increase AMPA-mediated transmission. Clinical implication: learning and extinction (e.g. exposure therapy) are plasticity processes; delayed antidepressant effects have been linked to slower adaptive plasticity/neurotrophic changes rather than instantaneous 'filling a serotonin tank.' [1][6]
(iii) Dopamine map and version III. Mesolimbic — positive symptoms/salience; mesocortical — cognition/negatives; nigrostriatal — EPS with blockade; tuberoinfundibular — prolactin with blockade. Version III: multiple upstream risks converge on striatal dopamine dysregulation as a final common pathway producing aberrant salience. [2]
(iv) Methods. Structural MRI when organic red flags (atypical onset, focal signs, decline) — not to 'confirm MDD.' fMRI BOLD is a haemodynamic proxy; research-powerful; reverse inference dangerous; not routine diagnosis. [3] EEG for seizures/encephalopathy differentials. PET/SPECT occupancy underpins receptor pharmacology teaching (e.g. D2) but is not required before every prescription.
(v) Translation. Psychosis: striatal DA/aberrant salience and network dysconnectivity (triple-network framing). Depression: limbic–prefrontal and reward circuit dysfunction plus stress–neurotrophic models — not pure monoamine deficiency. Anchors: Howes–Kapur; Nestler; Menon; Logothetis for method humility. [2][5][6]
Common errors
Saying RDoC replaces DSM; equating BOLD with spike counts; diagnosing individuals from group imaging; chemical-imbalance monologues; forgetting organic red flags; mapping EPS to the wrong pathway. [2][3][4]
References
- [1]Malenka RC, Bear MF LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches Neuron, 2004.PMID 15450156
- [2]Howes OD, Kapur S The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III--the final common pathway Schizophr Bull, 2009.PMID 19325164
- [3]Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal Nature, 2001.PMID 11449264
- [4]Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders Am J Psychiatry, 2010.PMID 20595427
- [5]Menon V Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model Trends Cogn Sci, 2011.PMID 21908230
- [6]Nestler EJ, Barrot M, DiLeone RJ, et al. Neurobiology of depression Neuron, 2002.PMID 11931738