Skip to main content
MMedVellum
MCQsExamsAtlas
DashboardPricing
MMedVellum

The exam atlas that feels like a flagship product — evidence-graded topics and exam tools for MBBS and fellowship preparation. Built to scale to fifty specialties. Educational content only — not medical advice.

llms.txt·psychiatry LLM catalog · sitemap

Atlas

  • Specialty atlas
  • MBBS / Core medicine
  • Dermatology
  • ICU Fellowship (CICM)
  • Anaesthesia
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry Fellowship

Study & account

  • MCQ practice
  • Practice alias
  • Exam tools
  • Dashboard
  • Pricing
  • Sign in

© 2026 MedVellum. For education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement.

Clinical Atlas Prestige · Evidence-first

Psych MEQs / SAQsAddiction psychiatry — cannabis and psychosis

Psych MEQs / SAQs · Addiction psychiatry — cannabis and psychosis

Cannabis use and psychosis — dual formulation to integrated care (MEQ)

FRANZCP-style MEQ on cannabis–psychosis dual diagnosis: classification, potency/frequency assessment, parallel treatment, SIP conversion risk, and family counselling.

20 marks20 min
On this page & tools

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB

Target exams

FRANZCPMRCPsychABPNMD-DNB
Prompt
An 18-year-old college student is brought by parents after 4 weeks of believing classmates track him through his phone and 2 weeks of third-person auditory commentary. He smokes high-THC cannabis most nights since age 15. Last joint was yesterday. He is alert, afebrile, and without focal neurology. Insight is partial. Urine immunoassay is cannabis-positive. (i) Formulate the differential including intoxication, cannabis-induced psychotic disorder, and primary FEP with comorbidity. (ii) List assessment priorities including cannabis history elements that change risk. (iii) Outline acute and definitive management of both psychosis and cannabis use disorder, with a named oral antipsychotic example (dose and monitoring) if you start one. (iv) Counsel the family on potency, adolescent risk, conversion risk after substance-induced psychosis, and follow-up. (20 marks)

Model answer

Reveal model answer

(i) Differential / working dual formulation. Not pure intoxication alone (symptoms span weeks with organised delusions and commentary). Working possibilities: cannabis-associated first presentation — cannabis-induced psychotic disorder versus primary first-episode psychosis with CUD comorbidity. Hold dual formulation until course after reduced use clarifies independence. Also exclude delirium/organic (currently low probability if alert and afebrile without red flags) and consider affective psychosis if mood becomes primary. Other substances on history. [1][5]

(ii) Assessment priorities. Risk (suicide, violence, vulnerability, driving, childcare); collateral and premorbid function; cannabis timeline — age of onset (15), frequency (most nights), high-THC potency, route, last use, withdrawal, CUD criteria; MSE with examples; capacity/legal status under local statute; baseline metabolic panel and ECG before antipsychotics; urine screen supports exposure but does not timestamp onset or measure potency. [1][5]

(iii) Management. Safety and least-restrictive setting that is still safe; do not withhold antipsychotics solely for positive UDS. Example start if psychosis warrants treatment: aripiprazole 10 mg orally daily after baselines, counsel akathisia, review within days, trial about 4–6 weeks with adherence support. Parallel CUD package: motivational interviewing, CBT for cannabis, family psychoeducation, contingency management if available — psychosocial interventions have the best evidence base for CUD. Address withdrawal (irritability, insomnia, craving) supportively. Refer early intervention / dual-diagnosis pathway. Relapse plan must name cannabis continuation as a risk amplifier. [3][4][5]

(iv) Family counselling. High-THC daily use is associated with increased psychotic disorder risk and contributes to incidence variation (EU-GEI framing); adolescent onset is a higher-risk window. Some substance-induced psychoses convert later to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder — resolution now does not mean zero follow-up. Continued use after onset raises relapse risk. Avoid fatalism ("schizophrenia forever on day one") and avoid minimisation ("just weed"). Crisis contacts, named review, education and study supports. [1][2][4]

Common errors

  • Discharging as "drug-induced, no follow-up."
  • Withholding antipsychotics until UDS clears.
  • Asking only "do you use cannabis?" without frequency/potency/age of onset.
  • Ignoring CUD psychosocial treatment.
  • Inventing Mental Health Act section numbers for the wrong jurisdiction.
  • Claiming CBD oil cures CUD or replaces antipsychotics. [2][3]

Examiner notes

Full marks require dual formulation language, potency/frequency assessment, named drug with dose and monitoring, parallel CUD psychosocial package, SIP conversion follow-up, and non-moralising family counselling grounded in Di Forti/Schoeler/Starzer-level evidence. [1][2][5]

References

  1. [1]Di Forti M, Quattrone D, Freeman TP, et al. The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study Lancet Psychiatry, 2019.PMID 30902669
  2. [2]Starzer MSK, Nordentoft M, Hjorthøj C Rates and Predictors of Conversion to Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Following Substance-Induced Psychosis Am J Psychiatry, 2018.PMID 29179576
  3. [3]Gates PJ, Sabioni P, Copeland J, et al. Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016.PMID 27149547
  4. [4]Schoeler T, Petros N, Di Forti M, et al. Effects of continuation, frequency, and type of cannabis use on relapse in the first 2 years after onset of psychosis: an observational study Lancet Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 27567467
  5. [5]Galletly C, Castle D, Dark F, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the management of schizophrenia and related disorders Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 2016.PMID 27106681